98? Sure. 99 though?silkk the shocker was a big star.
don't get caught up in the coli's revisionist rhetoric.
...yeah, I think I'm too late for this thread
98? Sure. 99 though?
He def was. Lolsilkk the shocker was a big star.
don't get caught up in the coli's revisionist rhetoric.
Pretty sure he only went platinum in the states with I Am, so stfu airhead. What features? It's Mine and...?No ur a fukkin idiot. I not only lived thru it but I was a fukkin DJ at the time. fukkin goofy. A nikka with a number 1 multiplat album ain’t top tier only in a retards eyes. Not even including Nas’ features that year.
Nah he went double plat.Pretty sure he only went platinum in the states with I Am, so stfu airhead. What features? It's Mine and...?
as for the LOX, they were the actual group that was right up there with X, jay & nas.
with this BS. The Lox was nowhere near them in 1999. This is the type of revisionist history and narrative pushing that has to stop. You can't even name a song by The Lox that was poppin in 1999 and are in here dissing the one song they remotely had in 1999 that was if significance.
Exactly what put The Lox up there with X, Jay, and Nas in 1999? X was the reason Ruff Ryders blew up in the first place. Behind him, Eve was the biggest artist on RR. And if you're using the whole "they were killing features" schtick, Eve had bigger guest spots and was more sought after than The Lox.
98? Sure. 99 though?
im talking bout the chit that was really getting played in the streets up top.
I don't think you understood the premise of the argument we were having.
your arguing points are better suited for the thread that I just linked up, where I don't have the LOX ranked as highly.
also, I forgot to mention the FREE THE LOX mixtape.
theres your songs. enjoy.