I'm an Alpha male
Breh, how you know so goddamn much about me?
I'm an Alpha male
Breh, how you know so goddamn much about me?
Natural leader of men
Physically gifted
Gifted with women
Can beat life out of other men
-Intelligence
-Physical power
-Emotional stability
-Self-respect
-Courage
-Passion/determination
If a man has all of these qualities, then society at large will consider him an alpha male.
How'd that work out for Dominique Strauss-Kahn? power, wealth and influence are very different and very criss-crossed.
Obama has a lot of power but many people eclipse his wealth. The owner of the Washington Post has a lot of influence but random Erin Brokovich types can channel more influence sometimes. It's very ambiguous.
I disagree, they correlate highly with each other, but of course there relationship is not perfect. As far as your Dominique Strauss reference, I understand that he abdicated his position, but what's your point?
As far as government and publicist figures are concerned, you're smart enough to know that many such figures have been manipulated by the influence of large corporate shareholders (or their financial pull; to be more specific) countless times in the past.
Ultimately, if a decision provides the highest monetary benefit, the decision will most probably be made. That's the reason private organisations, state organisation, and even noble causes such as profit free charity organisations are all exposed to risks of high corruption.
Money is perhaps the most powerful incentive in the world, there is no ambiguity in that regards, the latter sentence been echoed and proven since the times of barter and trade.
So again, those that control the most current assets are the most dominant because they ultimately yield the most influence and power.
I disagree, they correlate highly with each other, but of course there relationship is not perfect. As far as your Dominique Strauss reference, I understand that he abdicated his position, but what's your point?
So again, those that control the most current assets are the most dominant because they ultimately yield the most influence and power.
Here's the thing though....you can't base a creature being an "alpha" on currency. Animals don't have a currency/bartering system, they just survive, and alphas are born so. If the currency system/society as we know it were to fall apart, I honestly think that would be the absolute way of determining an alpha because it's pretty much every man for himself to survive by any means...just like animals. The true alphas are the ones who would be able to amass groups of people and lead them to survival IMO. You think someone like Bill Gates is going to last long if something like this were to happen? Money and power is simply too ambiguous and fickle to base that on...because either of those things can fleet in a second for any given reason, especially if the money goes.
You're right in a sense.
If the world was to fall apart and become every man relying on physical strength to reach the top, Bill Gates and the like would not be considered alpha males, because in that case control and power would be seized through peak physicality and aggressiveness, which i doubt bill gates has.
But as our society is today, in which power/ influence are mostly derived from current assets such as cash, Bill Gates and the like are the alpha males of society. There is no denying this.
Following most requirements for "alpha males", these attributes do not determine an alpha. A leader commands an army. Look at the mobsters for example...a lot of those guys were , but wanna know why people feared them? They had the $$$$ to hire muscle to do their dirty work. You could be an MMA champion status fighter with no fear, be rich, and be male model handsome but how's that going to cause....say a bunch of guys with guns ready to kidnap you and hold you for randsom hypothetically...respect or fear that?
It's not even about physical strength alone....yeah, you would need some physical strength, but at the same time, leadership qualities to maintain one's own society/military in an environment like that. You could be steroid strong but you won't be able to take on a group of armed, trained people.
You are right about people being "alphas" in status as far as society's structure as it stands. However, that would kind of contradict the theory of people being born alphas, because some people have amassed wealth due to being born into it, or through smarts/wits along with luck and circumstance. In some cases, they're only leaders because they were put into that seat and people lower in the company pecking order have to, but that would have nothing to do with them being natural leaders.