Yesterday price....You know the fukking rest: Chicago Bears šŸ» 2023 Off-Season thread

Po pimp

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
12,985
Reputation
2,134
Daps
48,274
Reppin
Chi-Town
Caleb projects to be HIM

Passing on him because you have a decent QB would be like the Bulls passing on Rose because they had Hinrich and Ben Gordon.

:stopitslime:
That's not the same at all, ESPECIALLY when all three were on the Bulls at the same time.
 

GoldenGlove

šŸ˜šŸ˜‘šŸ˜¶šŸ˜‘šŸ˜
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
58,971
Reputation
5,536
Daps
138,942
That's not the same at all, ESPECIALLY when all three were on the Bulls at the same time.
It is the same. The argument is drafting best player available vs for need/position.
 

Brozay

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
62,845
Reputation
7,081
Daps
180,216
Justin can do things that maybe 3-4 other QBs can do in this league. Just a matter of putting it all together. If you put a great team around him, heā€™ll look better and the Bears will contend. You can take a chance on a ā€œgenerationalā€ QB with that top pick, but the team still has holes, and thereā€™s a chance he wonā€™t pan out. Alex Smith was taken with the top pick, and he didnā€™t. The generational QB of that draft was Aaron Rodgers who won 4 MVPs, but only went to the Super Bowl once. Patrick Mahomes is a generational QB whoā€™s struggling to get wins as of late because his receivers canā€™t catch and they make mistakes. At the end of the day, you need a team.
the cupboard here isnt bare though, you draft Caleb at #1 and he has Moore, Kmet, Mooney (or whatever WR piece we add), solid running back core, a young improving OL and a young dynamic looking defense - and not to mention like 90 mil in capspace and a rookie QB contract for 5 years

and we dont have to give up any picks or assets to get him - and still have another top 10 pick in the mix and the rest of our draft capital (and whatever you get back from Fields, probably like a 2nd & a 4th)

#1 picks have gone to MUCH worst situations than we have here

this is all going to come down to how high Poles and his team grade out Caleb - if they grade him as an A+, franchise changing QB, they are going to take him IMO

we have ample resources to immediately build a strong cast around Caleb if Poles went that route
 
Last edited:

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
54,269
Reputation
11,545
Daps
368,527
Reppin
CHICAGO
Caleb projects to be HIM

Passing on him because you have a decent QB would be like the Bulls passing on Rose because they had Hinrich and Ben Gordon.

:stopitslime:

NO

1. JUSTIN IS AN ELITE TALENT

2. THE NFL ISNT LIKE THE NBA
WHERE ONE GUY CAN TURN A BAD
TEAM INTO WINNERS
SO YOU DONT TAKE THE BEST
GUY ON THE BOARD
IF THATS NOT THE POSITION YOUR
TEAM NEEDS TO FILL.

USE THAT PICK TO
SURROUND JUSTIN WITH MORE TALENT
AND THE TEAM WILL FLOURISH.

A MEDIOCRE TALENT LIKE BROCK PURDY
BEING IN THE MVP HUNT SHOULD
TELL YOU THAT.
:devil:
:evil:


 

Po pimp

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
12,985
Reputation
2,134
Daps
48,274
Reppin
Chi-Town
the cupboard here isnt bare though, you draft Caleb at #1 and he has Moore, Kmet, Mooney (or whatever WR piece we add), solid running back core, a young improving OL and a young dynamic looking defense - and not to mention like 90 mil in capspace and a rookie QB contract for 5 years

and we dont have to give up any picks or assets to get him - and still have another top 10 pick in the mix and the rest of our draft capital (and whatever you get back from Fields, probably like a 2nd & a 4th)

#1 picks have gone to MUCH worst situations than we have here

this is all going to come down to how high Poles and his team grade out Caleb - if they grade him as an A+, franchise changing QB, they are going to take him IMO

we have ample resources to immediately build a strong cast around Caleb if Poles went that route
I was higher on the Bears to start the season than most. While Fields didn't play well in the beginning, coaching didn't help in those games, and there were a bunch of injuries. Also, we didn't have Sweat and Yannick (or whatever his name is) in the beginning either. If we had this same team at the beginning, record might look a little different and the talk would be different.
It is the same. The argument is drafting best player available vs for need/position.
That's if you think Fields potential is only to that of a Hinrich or Gordon were for the Bulls. I think Fields has a higher ceiling than Williams. The question is if he can unlock his potential.
 

Brozay

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
62,845
Reputation
7,081
Daps
180,216
I was higher on the Bears to start the season than most. While Fields didn't play well in the beginning, coaching didn't help in those games, and there were a bunch of injuries. Also, we didn't have Sweat and Yannick (or whatever his name is) in the beginning either. If we had this same team at the beginning, record might look a little different and the talk would be different.

That's if you think Fields potential is only to that of a Hinrich or Gordon were for the Bulls. I think Fields has a higher ceiling than Williams. The question is if he can unlock his potential.
ultimately it all comes down to how Poles evaluates Caleb. I think every option is on the table.

Interesting to note, we traded the #1 pick 6 weeks before the draft last year, so Poles had a ton of conviction in that decision - if he holds the pick longer or until draft day, its going to be increasingly more likely (obviously) he is going to take a QB
 
Last edited:

Brozay

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
62,845
Reputation
7,081
Daps
180,216

7/7 GMs basically unanimously say they would trade Fields and take Caleb (for all the reasons Iā€™ve been saying why it makes sense for Poles) and think Poles will do as much

one comment from this sums it up well, imagine being the GM who passed on two #1 picks to take Stroud/Caleb (assuming Caleb shows out)

I would miss Justin too, I just feel like there is too many reasons on the table for why Poles would do this

Brad Biggs basically reported this too and heā€™s a long time Bears beat writer
 

prime

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2013
Messages
6,947
Reputation
1,179
Daps
18,632
Reppin
The heights
Im going to get so tired of this discourse between now and April :francis:
I feel like the if the bears lose and the offense looks bad Sunday Justin and getsy are out itā€™s that simple :yeshrug: I personally would fire eberflus as well but I think he stays
 

Brozay

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
62,845
Reputation
7,081
Daps
180,216
Im going to get so tired of this discourse between now and April :francis:
Im not trying to go too overboard with it, I just find the situation we are in to be fascinating

its not to be negative towards Justin either, its been great to see him improve & produce - I just think hes in a very difficult position right now

this decision by Poles carries crazy magnitude - I just try to look at it from his perspective, I dont know Caleb well enough to have strong conviction either way on the decision
 

Brozay

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
62,845
Reputation
7,081
Daps
180,216
and I know the thought of using that pick to help build around Fields, but I dont know that Poles will see it that way

he sees Fields as a guy who will be costing him 40 mil a year rather soon - thats more challenging to build around that a QB on a fresh rookie deal
 

red222

We Ready
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
16,720
Reputation
755
Daps
15,096
Reppin
Chicago
and I know the thought of using that pick to help build around Fields, but I dont know that Poles will see it that way

he sees Fields as a guy who will be costing him 40 mil a year rather soon - thats more challenging to build around that a QB on a fresh rookie deal
You better get a decent haul and be right..
You want a young Cutler or a shorter Fields? I'm sticking with who I know and seen improvement from. Poles better hope Williams can be better.
 

Brozay

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
62,845
Reputation
7,081
Daps
180,216
You better get a decent haul and be right..
You want a young Cutler or a shorter Fields? I'm sticking with who I know and seen improvement from. Poles better hope Williams can be better.
the inverse to that is you canā€™t be wrong if you stay with Fields. if Caleb is a superstar and Poles passed on both him and Stroud, we would need Justin to take another huge leap in his development and even then it still might not look good. Iā€™m surprised people are so down on Caleb here, itā€™s not like we are talking about replacing Justin with Derek Carr
 

Deafheaven

Gleaming and Empty
Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
21,297
Reputation
2,936
Daps
62,731
the inverse to that is you canā€™t be wrong if you stay with Fields. if Caleb is a superstar and Poles passed on both him and Stroud, we would need Justin to take another huge leap in his development and even then it still might not look good. Iā€™m surprised people are so down on Caleb here, itā€™s not like we are talking about replacing Justin with Derek Carr

You dont even need fields to take a huge leap. The D is another Egde and replacing Bojack away.

Getsy is in over his head
 
Top