I disagree, its quite rare to find african americans who have mothers that look like Sonya Curry or a father that looks like Ayesha Curry's father. Definitely not the norm.Thats the point....and people that look like them aren't rare in the usa.
I disagree, its quite rare to find african americans who have mothers that look like Sonya Curry or a father that looks like Ayesha Curry's father. Definitely not the norm.Thats the point....and people that look like them aren't rare in the usa.
I disagree, its quite rare to find african americans who have mothers that look like Sonya Curry or a father that looks like Ayesha Curry's father. Definitely not the norm.
The Curry's arent a good example considering Sonya Curry is isnt really black and furthermore having seen Ayeesha Curry's dad looks almost middle eastern.
not that long ago these ancestry test to implied Egyptian Pharaoh King Tut was genetically British cac so i'll let you be the judge
i put it out there cause i know if massah said it sheep like you will fall in line/accept it as gospel not cause i personally subscribe to the practiceHow in fukin hell can you believe an AA traced their heritage to Tuaregs
And you believe it? So now you believe in the science of dna?
The dna evidence says AA DNA came from west Africa and a some European, that's a scientific fact and it's backed up by historical facts
I'm not emphasizing anything, I made the assertion that AA were 25 percent white, and I was just pointing out the light skin AA population as to why that number is accurate if you understand that it's an average
And I never said there are a lot of people that were passing but their existence shows the high levels of miscagnetion in the black community, and their existence shows why you can't equate light skin in the us to light skin in west Africa, cuz it's not just light skin, it was hair type and eye color in AA that allowed them to pass
And today people joke about light skin vs dark skin but during the 1900's it was much more serious, books have been written about light skin blacks and the subculture they created, ignorance about this shows a lot of you haven't read books, cuz the light skin movement in the 1900s is an important part of AA history
Again you fools need to travel
I have been to Africa... I seen plenty of light skin nikkas who ain't got a drop of cac,Arab or Asian blood in em
People who live in colder climates were light as fukk or darker than Adebisi..it was spooky
All pure Bantu mofos
Visit tribes who live near the Kilimanjaro mountain and report back
even if what you say is correct your dumbass knows that most sex doesn't end in birth andmsot peckerwoods were raping blacks didn't want and most likely took precautions to not breed with them rightthroughout our time in this country blacks have procreated with other blacks in a much larger numbers,for a longer sustained time and more frequently than the random blacks whom bred with cacs....there is no documented evidence of mass breeding between blacks and whites on such a mass and sustained scale to notably effect AAs gene pool cause it simply didn't occur but feel free to prove me otherswiseI would never post a picture as a form of scientific evidence, in fact i specifically said that light skin is not evidence of white genes, that was like in the my 3rd or 4th post in this thread
Significant consensual and non consensual sex between blacks and whites not just in the us but all over the Western Hemisphere is a historical fact and has been thoroughly documented
Go read a book
oh so you genetic expert nowif the white supremacist behind these bogus genetic studies will blatantly fabricate Tut's genetics there is nothing to stop them from doing the same to AAsThat isn't what happens, extracting DNA from a 2000 year old mummy is very different than extracting DNA from a living person's saliva
Those tut test were controversial and inconclusive, cuz again it was from 2000 year old mummy
DNA testing is accurate
i put it out there cause i know if massah said it sheep like you will fall in line/accept it as gospel not cause i personally subscribe to the practice
i'm sure some AAs do....as we do have a sizable but minority biracial population but as an whole AAs aint mixed liked that and you want find a reputable historical source which backs that position
and i'm telling your simple ass....that just not reality....25% white is a recent/immediate white ancestor,,..ask yourself do you have a living or identifiable recent cac as one as your elders,do most of your AA friends,associatesthe presence of lightskin AAs is just not enough as they are found in Afiica too...i can see your point if most or half AAs were high yellow but that's just not reality
-Nah all that shows is there were a few whites of mixed ancestry were sometimes lumped with blacks due to racist one drop rule nothing more or less....most lightskin AAs look like their darer skinned peers only with lighter skin so i miss your point...furthermore Did you see the lightskin Africans I postedthere hair type and eye color isn't that different from those special lite brite AAs you take such pride in
let me get this right.....cause cacs instiaged a lightskin vs darkskin tension in the 1900s it means all AAs are mixed
oh so you genetic expert nowif the white supremacist behind these bogus genetic studies will blatantly fabricate Tut's genetics there is nothing to stop them from doing the same to AAs
yeah DNA testing is so accurate it implied an Ancient African man was actually Western European
nah i put it out there cause i couldn't find that link i remember reading on another board years ago which mentioned Tuareg as a likely ancestral group of AAs so i alluded to the next best thing implying a similar notionNah you put it out there cuz you forgot that the basis of your argument is that DNA is not accurate
I certainly believe that an AA can trace an ancestor to Tuaregs, and there are some that can be traced to east Africa and Southern Africa but that is small
But OVERALL AA's are west African
25 percent doesn't mean your grand parent are white, this goes back to people not understanding basic math and not understanding basic science
And you like others are confused about what you are trying to prove, light skin is just one phenotype
I'm not being facetious when I mention Thurgood Marshall and smokey Robinson, I'm being dead serious
The 25 percent DNA manifests itself in more than just light skin, if you show the west African Thurgood Marshall then you'll have a point, showing random light skin Africans or spouting some gibberish about Tuaregs isn't gonna cut it
I was replying to the idiot who said there's no such thing as lightskin Africans without admixture
You can look at some AA and tell there's cac DNA in them...ie Smokey
But without proof.. it's not scientific to assume every light skin/Brown skin AA has some cac in him
Not all West Africans are dark-skinned
Let me ask you this...is it outlandish to assume that a percentage of slaves stayed 'pure'? No mixing with whites or all other slaves tainted by white blood?
Meanwhile, the genetic ancestry of is 22 percent European with around 10 percent of U.S. Blacks being of more than 50 percent European ancestry. (source: Taylor Media Services)
its' ironic cause i i think the same thing when I read you pigskins in virtual blackface attempt the same tired Willie Lynch tactics in these type of threads
yeah i guess all these lightskin Africans are skin bleachers and are Akon dark in their natural state
(lady in the pink 12:00 mark , bright dude in colorful button shirt 12:35 mark, caramel girls at 12:18 mark more random lightskins sprinked there after)
(lady in batman tank top 3:15,mark little boy in yellow shirt 6:23, mark)