the right voice, talented actin & everything, heda been epic....Michael Clarke Duncan would have been an excellent choice for Apocalypse
the right voice, talented actin & everything, heda been epic....Michael Clarke Duncan would have been an excellent choice for Apocalypse
u sound like a wrestling fan that still pines for the edginess we saw in the 80s/90s to come back it never will. Just like fox aint about to give up there most lucrative superhero cash cow to marvel until the genre isOk this really needs to be the last X-Men movie so they can reboot this shyt and tie it into the other Marvel stuff.
Brian singer is a fakkit
Not really but ok.u sound like a wrestling fan that still pines for the edginess we saw in the 80s/90s to come back it never will. Just like fox aint about to give up there most lucrative superhero cash cow to marvel until the genre is
We're more likely to see a DC/Marvel movie crossover before Marvel gets the rights back to X-Men.Ok this really needs to be the last X-Men movie so they can reboot this shyt and tie it into the other Marvel stuff.
they said that's why they are touching on time travel this movie... to basically go back and fix up a lot of the inconsistencies in the moviesXavier must have gotten healed somehow. Either Beast, or maybe even Trasks industries.
Either way...it IS consistent with former movies. In Xmen 3, in the flashback where Xavier and Magneto find Jean, they are both walking. In Origins, he's shown walking well into the 80's.
8 ways X-Men movie continuity is irretrievably fukked
It talks about some of the problems with the timeline....make no mistake, where taking some L's...hopefully this movies fixes everything somehow.
I talked a bit about it above but....in foX-Men, they don't discover Jean Grey until sometime in the 70's. Scott is likely the same.
As we talked about on the last page, Quicksilver likely isn't going to be Magneto's son in this...and while Scarlet Witch is his sister...they clearly aren't twins.
they said that's why they are touching on time travel this movie... to basically go back and fix up a lot of the inconsistencies in the movies
how well they pull that off tho?? who knows
but i'm thinking wolverine transports back BEFORE the events of the last movie
cause that would be the only explanation as to how X is still walking and beast ain't beast
but then why is magneto in prison???
this is either gonna be cause they make it all make sense
or cause they only fukked it up more
dude I was trying to be kind its foolhardy to even fathom fox would ever let go of wolverine let alone x-menNot really but ok.
u know spiderman is sony right? looks like some1 tellinSo supposedly there is an X-Men scene in the end credits of Spider Man 2 But they are in no way going to merge the two franchises.
@ fakkit ass Fox trolling nikkas.
Brian singer is a fakkit
Movie is already out overseas and its been confirmedu know spiderman is sony right? looks like some1 tellin
u know spiderman is sony right? looks like some1 tellin
so basically fans just have a wet dream of what could've been but no future tie in? what a waste of timeMovie is already out overseas and its been confirmed
---------------------------
‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2′: Secret Contract Got ‘X-Men’ Coda in Film | Variety
The “Amazing Spider-Man 2″ opens today overseas, and fans are already buzzing on Twitter over its end credits. The Sony Pictures release concludes with a teaser for the upcoming “X-Men: Days of Future Past,” a new sequence that has been added since “Spidey 2″ premiered in London last week.
The montage, which features a blue Jennifer Lawrence as Mystique, is meant to mimic the coda scenes that conclude the Disney and Marvel Pictures juggernauts, including “Captain America: The Winter Soldier,” which introduce new characters.
But in the case of the “Avengers” films, Disney is promoting its own material. The Spidey situation is different: Sony, which owns the “Spider-Man” films, is plugging a rival studio’s product, since the seventh “X-Men” sequel is released by Twentieth Century Fox on May 23. (Marvel acts as a traditional licensor for the non-Disney-owned Marvel characters.)
Why would Sony do that?
The reason, Variety has learned, is that “Spider-Man” director Marc Webb had an existing contract with Fox Searchlight to helm another film following 2009′s “500 (Days) of Summer.” After “The Amazing Spider-Man” in 2012, Webb’s negotiations briefly stalled with Sony as he was caught in a tug-of-war with Fox. Eventually, Fox agreed to allow Webb to direct Sony’s “Spider-Man” sequel, but only if Sony would promote its “X-Men” film for free.
For Sony, there’s another benefit to the cross-promotion. It allows the studio to situate its movie in the same Marvel family as Captain America and Iron Man, even if the creative team behind those films — including star producer Kevin Feige — are separate. Many fans look forward to the much-hyped codas at the end of a Marvel film.
That said, some U.K. fans who saw “Spider-Man 2″ on opening day were confused, wondering if it meant a single “X-Men” and “Spider-Man” movie is being planned. That’s not happening.