X-men: Days of Future past teaser trailer

Roman Brady

Nobody Lives Forever
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,749
Reputation
-1,045
Daps
14,880
Ok this really needs to be the last X-Men movie so they can reboot this shyt and tie it into the other Marvel stuff.
u sound like a wrestling fan that still pines for the edginess we saw in the 80s/90s to come back it never will. Just like fox aint about to give up there most lucrative superhero cash cow to marvel until the genre is :flabbynsick:
 

Dwolf

Veteran
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
35,577
Reputation
9,585
Daps
107,276
Reppin
Murim
u sound like a wrestling fan that still pines for the edginess we saw in the 80s/90s to come back it never will. Just like fox aint about to give up there most lucrative superhero cash cow to marvel until the genre is :flabbynsick:
Not really but ok.
 

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
35,409
Reputation
7,644
Daps
98,260
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
Xavier must have gotten healed somehow. Either Beast, or maybe even Trasks industries.

Either way...it IS consistent with former movies. In Xmen 3, in the flashback where Xavier and Magneto find Jean, they are both walking. In Origins, he's shown walking well into the 80's.

8 ways X-Men movie continuity is irretrievably fukked

It talks about some of the problems with the timeline....make no mistake, where taking some L's...hopefully this movies fixes everything somehow.



I talked a bit about it above but....in foX-Men, they don't discover Jean Grey until sometime in the 70's. Scott is likely the same.

As we talked about on the last page, Quicksilver likely isn't going to be Magneto's son in this...and while Scarlet Witch is his sister...they clearly aren't twins.
they said that's why they are touching on time travel this movie... to basically go back and fix up a lot of the inconsistencies in the movies

how well they pull that off tho?? who knows

but i'm thinking wolverine transports back BEFORE the events of the last movie

cause that would be the only explanation as to how X is still walking and beast ain't beast

but then why is magneto in prison???


this is either gonna be :blessed: cause they make it all make sense


or :snoop: cause they only fukked it up more
 

Box Cutta

Bumbling Sidekick
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
16,784
Reputation
2,364
Daps
39,483
Reppin
Sanitation Department
they said that's why they are touching on time travel this movie... to basically go back and fix up a lot of the inconsistencies in the movies

how well they pull that off tho?? who knows

but i'm thinking wolverine transports back BEFORE the events of the last movie

cause that would be the only explanation as to how X is still walking and beast ain't beast

but then why is magneto in prison???


this is either gonna be :blessed: cause they make it all make sense


or :snoop: cause they only fukked it up more

At least part of the movie takes place in the earlier 70's....Wolverine definitely goes back *after* First Class at some point. In the trailer, Xavier and Magneto know each other (Xavier punches him, also says something about "taking the things that meant the most to me" in reference to Mystique). I don't know if he gets sent to different points at different parts of the film or what.

Magneto's imprisonment is explained in the viral marketing websites :
25 Moments | Official Movie Site | View Trailers
X-Men: Days of Future Past | The Bent Bullet

He was imprisoned for the murder of JFK....however, the websites seem to hint that it was actually Mystique who shot the bullets. Magneto may have been trying to stop the assassination but took the fall. Or maybe they were in cahoots. Gonna have to wait and see, assuming the movie gets into it.

We still don't know about Xavier and Beast. For Xavier, could be like I said...medical treatment. I've also read online that he could be projecting the appearance of himself walking...heard that he's done that before in the comics.

Beast had already been trying to cure himself, maybe he came up with some concoction that momentarily works but that isn't permanent.

And of course, the trailers could be misleading. Either of those guys could be Mystique.

And if they go heavy on the alternative universe stuff, well than sheeeiit, they can do pretty much whatever they want.

All I know is that we're about to feast offa this....:jawalrus:
 

Ethnic Vagina Finder

The Great Paper Chaser
Bushed
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
53,950
Reputation
2,486
Daps
152,951
Reppin
North Jersey but I miss Cali :sadcam:
u know spiderman is sony right? looks like some1 tellin :duck:


:mjpls:
Movie is already out overseas and its been confirmed
---------------------------
‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2′: Secret Contract Got ‘X-Men’ Coda in Film | Variety

The “Amazing Spider-Man 2″ opens today overseas, and fans are already buzzing on Twitter over its end credits. The Sony Pictures release concludes with a teaser for the upcoming “X-Men: Days of Future Past,” a new sequence that has been added since “Spidey 2″ premiered in London last week.
The montage, which features a blue Jennifer Lawrence as Mystique, is meant to mimic the coda scenes that conclude the Disney and Marvel Pictures juggernauts, including “Captain America: The Winter Soldier,” which introduce new characters.
But in the case of the “Avengers” films, Disney is promoting its own material. The Spidey situation is different: Sony, which owns the “Spider-Man” films, is plugging a rival studio’s product, since the seventh “X-Men” sequel is released by Twentieth Century Fox on May 23. (Marvel acts as a traditional licensor for the non-Disney-owned Marvel characters.)
Why would Sony do that?
The reason, Variety has learned, is that “Spider-Man” director Marc Webb had an existing contract with Fox Searchlight to helm another film following 2009′s “500 (Days) of Summer.” After “The Amazing Spider-Man” in 2012, Webb’s negotiations briefly stalled with Sony as he was caught in a tug-of-war with Fox. Eventually, Fox agreed to allow Webb to direct Sony’s “Spider-Man” sequel, but only if Sony would promote its “X-Men” film for free.
For Sony, there’s another benefit to the cross-promotion. It allows the studio to situate its movie in the same Marvel family as Captain America and Iron Man, even if the creative team behind those films — including star producer Kevin Feige — are separate. Many fans look forward to the much-hyped codas at the end of a Marvel film.
That said, some U.K. fans who saw “Spider-Man 2″ on opening day were confused, wondering if it meant a single “X-Men” and “Spider-Man” movie is being planned. That’s not happening.
 

Diunx

Probably drunk
Joined
Nov 18, 2013
Messages
10,953
Reputation
1,246
Daps
32,783
Reppin
nightset
So a few seconds sequence in a blockbuster is worth more to this studios than a indie flick? :mjlol:
 

Roman Brady

Nobody Lives Forever
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,749
Reputation
-1,045
Daps
14,880
Movie is already out overseas and its been confirmed
---------------------------
‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2′: Secret Contract Got ‘X-Men’ Coda in Film | Variety

The “Amazing Spider-Man 2″ opens today overseas, and fans are already buzzing on Twitter over its end credits. The Sony Pictures release concludes with a teaser for the upcoming “X-Men: Days of Future Past,” a new sequence that has been added since “Spidey 2″ premiered in London last week.
The montage, which features a blue Jennifer Lawrence as Mystique, is meant to mimic the coda scenes that conclude the Disney and Marvel Pictures juggernauts, including “Captain America: The Winter Soldier,” which introduce new characters.
But in the case of the “Avengers” films, Disney is promoting its own material. The Spidey situation is different: Sony, which owns the “Spider-Man” films, is plugging a rival studio’s product, since the seventh “X-Men” sequel is released by Twentieth Century Fox on May 23. (Marvel acts as a traditional licensor for the non-Disney-owned Marvel characters.)
Why would Sony do that?
The reason, Variety has learned, is that “Spider-Man” director Marc Webb had an existing contract with Fox Searchlight to helm another film following 2009′s “500 (Days) of Summer.” After “The Amazing Spider-Man” in 2012, Webb’s negotiations briefly stalled with Sony as he was caught in a tug-of-war with Fox. Eventually, Fox agreed to allow Webb to direct Sony’s “Spider-Man” sequel, but only if Sony would promote its “X-Men” film for free.
For Sony, there’s another benefit to the cross-promotion. It allows the studio to situate its movie in the same Marvel family as Captain America and Iron Man, even if the creative team behind those films — including star producer Kevin Feige — are separate. Many fans look forward to the much-hyped codas at the end of a Marvel film.
That said, some U.K. fans who saw “Spider-Man 2″ on opening day were confused, wondering if it meant a single “X-Men” and “Spider-Man” movie is being planned. That’s not happening.
so basically fans just have a wet dream of what could've been but no future tie in? what a waste of time :camby:
 
Top