Would you consider Aborigines black?

[31Flavors]

For the millionth time: yes.

So is it that y'all are doing the same math as white supremacists with the whole "racially pure" bullshyt? Most of you are not 100% African so you wouldn't even pass your own stupid ass test.

I will write it again just because:

What percentage African is enough to be considered black? 50%? No cause people try to say Obama isn't black. Is Michelle black? She looks like massa got to one of her ancestors. Let's say she is 75% African so she qualifies. Now their kids are like 63% African so they qualify too. So now Obama is the only non Black but has black kids. So why couldn't Obama's non Black mom have a black kid?

If the above sounds stupid it's CAUSE IT IS. Smart dumb niqqa thinking at it's finest.

Stop trying to divide us up. We need all the soldiers we can get.

kumbaya, kumbaya

 

[Yehuda]

Do you consider dark-skinned people from India "Black"?

 

[notwhoiusedtobe]

Correct.

Actually, no, it's not correct

They conclude that the ancestors of this Aboriginal man, and possibly all Aboriginals, are of similar distance from Africans as are other Eurasians, and that at about 62,000-75,000 BP the Aboriginal ancestors split from the gene pool that gave rise to all other populations of modern humans. The authors5 say their study supports the model of human evolution according to which the modern Australian Aboriginal people descended from an early wave of expansion into Asia about 62,000-75,000 BP. Their data also supports the substantial population admixing and replacement of populations of the first wave by the 2nd expansion wave, predicted by this model, though a few populations are descendants of the early dispersal, such as those in Australia and the highlands of Papua New Guinea and Aeta. According to the authors5 this is compatible with data from mtDNA that indicate they derived from the same few founder haplogroups shared by all populations outside Africa, though all haplogroups observed in Australia are unique to this area. The data also support the the suggestion that modern Aboriginal Australians have descended from the first humans that entered Australia at least about 50,000 BP. Aboriginal Australians are indicated by this to probably have one of the oldest population histories, that is continuous, outside sub-Saharan Africa of the present.

Genetic Evidence

 

[Redeem87]

Yes but not the light ones they are not the OGs

 

[KOohbt]

No I consider myself aborigine

just like I consider myself native.

With that said. No they aren't black. This is an exclusive club. Stop trying to let people who don't even remotely identify with us, us.

 

[twhatever]

Colloquially,black means 'of sub Saharan African descent'.No,there's little genetic similarity between Aboriginal Australians and sub Saharan Africans.
In fact,they diverged from the ancestors of Africans(75k yrs ago) before diverging from the ancestors Asians and Europeans(65k yrs ago).

 

[notwhoiusedtobe]

Do you consider dark-skinned people from India "Black"?

Bruh, there are black people all over India. This is what Malcolm was saying decades ago. We're everywhere, we're just unconnected and uniformed.

Siddi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The first Siddis are thought to have arrived in India in 628 AD at the Bharuch port. Several others followed with the first Arab Islamic invasions of the subcontinent in 712 AD.[14] The latter group are believed to have been soldiers with Muhammad bin Qasim's Arab army, and were called Zanjis.

Siddis are descended from Bantu peoples from Southeast Africa that were brought to the Indian subcontinent as slaves by the Portuguese.[1] "

 

[BigMan]

they black but they not African

 

[onelastdeath]

I've always looked at "black" as an American thing as well. When it comes to our culture anyway.

 

[Megadeus]

We've all heard it before,
"Im not black, Im Nigerian," "Im not black, Im Jamaican," ect...

no we haven't.....

 

[Redeem87]

no we haven't.....

Only people I've heard say that is Dominicans

 

[Spade]

Do you consider dark-skinned people from India "Black"?

Yes

 

[Chichi Manietzsche]

:conusher: Clown.

Im African so apparently I'm not black?

I could slap that same shyt on you, AA's who are like 20-30 percent white who are they to decide what is "black" and what isn't

Won't even entertain this, just get that neg clown

:sodomites:

Not at all, its just that AA's get berated and accused all the time of trying to claim everyone as black, when they feel like they're not.

Ive heard outside of America, "black" people prefer to identify by their tribe/culture/nationality/, not just under the umbrella term of "blackness," so thats what I go by. If you say you're black, then great, but like I said I won't go outta my way to police someone else's identity.

 

[Yehuda]

Bruh, there are black people all over India. This is what Malcolm was saying decades ago. We're everywhere, we're just unconnected and uniformed.

Siddi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The first Siddis are thought to have arrived in India in 628 AD at the Bharuch port. Several others followed with the first Arab Islamic invasions of the subcontinent in 712 AD.[14] The latter group are believed to have been soldiers with Muhammad bin Qasim's Arab army, and were called Zanjis.

Siddis are descended from Bantu peoples from Southeast Africa that were brought to the Indian subcontinent as slaves by the Portuguese.[1] "

Now what about these people:

 

[bcrusaderw]

Actually, no, it's not correct

They conclude that the ancestors of this Aboriginal man, and possibly all Aboriginals, are of similar distance from Africans as are other Eurasians, and that at about 62,000-75,000 BP the Aboriginal ancestors split from the gene pool that gave rise to all other populations of modern humans. The authors5 say their study supports the model of human evolution according to which the modern Australian Aboriginal people descended from an early wave of expansion into Asia about 62,000-75,000 BP. Their data also supports the substantial population admixing and replacement of populations of the first wave by the 2nd expansion wave, predicted by this model, though a few populations are descendants of the early dispersal, such as those in Australia and the highlands of Papua New Guinea and Aeta. According to the authors5 this is compatible with data from mtDNA that indicate they derived from the same few founder haplogroups shared by all populations outside Africa, though all haplogroups observed in Australia are unique to this area. The data also support the the suggestion that modern Aboriginal Australians have descended from the first humans that entered Australia at least about 50,000 BP. Aboriginal Australians are indicated by this to probably have one of the oldest population histories, that is continuous, outside sub-Saharan Africa of the present.

Genetic Evidence

What do you think this paragraph is concluding?