Women brag about withholding sex from husbands for power and control GMB

[Sccit]

DUMB BIITCHES

 

[King Frost]

Marriage’s primary purpose was to bind women to men, and thus guarantee that a man’s children were truly his biological heirs. Through marriage, a woman became a man’s property. In the betrothal ceremony of ancient Greece, a father would hand over his daughter with these words: “I pledge my daughter for the purpose of producing legitimate offspring.” Among the ancient Hebrews, men were free to take several wives; married Greeks and Romans were free to satisfy their sexual urges with concubines, prostitutes, and even teenage male lovers, while their wives were required to stay home and tend to the household. If wives failed to produce offspring, their husbands could give them back and marry someone else

For much of human history, couples were brought together for practical reasons, not because they fell in love. In time, of course, many marriage partners came to feel deep mutual love and devotion. But the idea of romantic love, as a motivating force for marriage, only goes as far back as the Middle Ages. Naturally, many scholars believe the concept was “invented” by the French.

a Stanford historian credits the concept of romantic love with giving women greater leverage in what had been a largely pragmatic transaction. Wives no longer existed solely to serve men. The romantic prince, in fact, sought to serve the woman he loved. Still, the notion that the husband “owned” the wife continued to hold sway for centuries. When colonists first came to America—at a time when polygamy was still accepted in most parts of the world—the husband’s dominance was officially recognized under a legal doctrine called “coverture,” under which the new bride’s identity was absorbed into his. The bride gave up her name to symbolize the surrendering of her identity, and the husband suddenly became more important

Women won the right to vote. When that happened, in 1920, the institution of marriage began a dramatic transformation. Suddenly, each union consisted of two full citizens

 

[Sterling Archer]

Facts, you don’t seem like the marrying type.

Ouch

 

[CW_1991]

This is why you have concubines.

Also, for those of you who don't know, it's okay for a man to have more than one woman. Biblically.

Doesn't mean men necessarily should but, it's not a sin.

That's without even diving deep into the topic of this thread.

 

[Bossino]

People tend to treat people how they feel they are permitted.

Set and enforce standards

 

[Turbulent]

The funny part is that there's no way these women aren't miserable. They gotta feel like losers knowing the best men they managed to get are such lames...

 

[The Fade]

How many men you think giving in to the sex strike letting her think she’s winning

while he coming home empty and happy after getting flute dome or a doublestack

and she like

 

[ItzRailT]

LMAO I wish a bytch would I'll be fukking all of her friends and than some

 

[Deus]

I meant take the strike....my bad

 

[Krisrunner2049]

Lol I’d fukk someone right in front of them Florida nikkas different

I’m sayin. That’s why I never had a gf yet cuz that’s my biggest fear. And I know imma savage so I’d play ball much harder

 

[Mandarin Duck]

RIP Patrice O'Neal.

 

[Serious]

I'd rather be single / divorced than in a sexless marriage.

 

[yung Herbie Hancock]

There's no reason why any man should get married in 2020. The only exception is if you own a lot of assets and want to pass down those assets to your kids. Other than that, #HOH #GMB

 

[Insensitive]

Clown babble.

You goin on strike ?
Ok, cool.

I'm going shopping for a new lady.
Thanks.

 

[Atlrocafella]

married life sounds miserable

a woman trying to control what you do and when you do it with divorce looming over your head

couldn't imagine living like that

seems like it gets worse/more stressful once you have kids

You ain’t ever lied. Gotta imagine the amount of men trapped in a situation like this.