I'm not trying to save face. I called you a fakkit from the go - why would I then attempt to save face for you?
You simply lack the ability to read context clues, and reply as if conversations exist in a vacuum - thus you failing to understand that my initial post posited Wolverine's height isn't crucial for an accurate depiction of the character. It's also why you wrongly equated "successful" with "profitability" - when the argument we're having is about subjective factors and how they are presented/framed as criticisms. You need dummy disclaimers at every corner, it's why you couldn't deduce what successful meant in this context.
see - fakkitry
Wolverine's height is crucial for an accurate depiction of te character, its literally why he constantly gets in bar fights and regular folks target him.
He isn't truly physically imposing, he is a small little ball of muscle and violence, but he isn't a physically intimidating character who can disarm you or make you back down with sheer physical presence like a Scott, Beast (pre accident), Colossus, and etc.
Wolverine's physical traits aren't subjective.
The funny part is I literally gave you a counter, in that the Jack REacher films were financially successful, even though Tom Cruise's casting to play reacher was roundly panned and felt to be entirely miscast and not in line with teh character.
Batman shouldn’t even be grounded all the concepts are fantasy they should play up to it but have some good dialogue and deliveryLooks good to be honest
Comic book movies should embrace the comics rather than trying to be all “realistic”/“dark”/“grounded” all the time. That shyt only works for Batman
Yeah just like height has no relevance to hobbits right?oh wow. insufferable comic trivia that has had no purpose/relevance in the character's live action portrayals.
I wasn't discussing Wolverine's physical traits - my first reply to you was that everybody knows he's a leprechaun - by subjective factors I referred to what we consider crucial character traits and how those inform and frame criticisms. See; your poor reading comprehension failed you again.
You didn't give me a counter - but rather you babbled about profitability because you equated my use of "successful" with said financial success - when in fact it was used in the context of critical reception/mass acceptance/satisfaction
thats the one thing ill allways have to look past as a fanI like the outfit.
Just wish they had a 5 foot 4 actor to play him properly.
Wolverine is a fukking runt, jubilee , a female teen, is taller than him
Maybe they should've gotten Kevin Hart to play Wolverine.thats the one thing ill allways have to look past as a fan
this nikka is pretty much Lil Wayne height but with 50 Cent biceps
I didn't know Wolverine was supposed to be that smallI like the outfit.
Just wish they had a 5 foot 4 actor to play him properly.
Wolverine is a fukking runt, jubilee , a female teen, is taller than him
Yeah man he is that short guy who is always over compensating.I didn't know Wolverine was supposed to be that small
i'll be honest, the 90s got cyclops' look right
the 70s was WOAT
80s was trash too
Speaking of dumb costumes
Can we discuss this one
I think it's dope.
That whole blue/gold team era of X-Men by Jim Lee was mmmmyyyyyy shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitttt
Thank god for Jim lee Now all characters just have bull shyt piping and lines that mean nothing.
I’ll take Rob Liefield pouches all day over these shyt modern designs.