Wolverine costume looks stupid asf in real life

Majestyx

Duck Season
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,978
Reputation
2,450
Daps
39,141
Reppin
Los Scandalous
The Worst Comic Book Super Villain Movie Costumes
The top 10 absolute worst live action comic book costumes(Edited) | Comics  Amino
:scust: spoiler those
 

Bugzbunny129

All Star
Joined
Apr 14, 2020
Messages
2,710
Reputation
977
Daps
6,282
I can see the sleeves being taken out in post as the gloves could be sliding over his hand so this keeps them intact.

But we’ll see
 

Uchiha God

Veteran
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
14,404
Reputation
6,656
Daps
88,876
Reppin
NULL
I like the outfit.
Just wish they had a 5 foot 4 actor to play him properly.

Wolverine is a fukking runt, jubilee , a female teen, is taller than him

Everybody knows comic book Wolverine is a leprechaun, but you don't need to be 5'4 to play him "properly".

That's the type of nitpicking comic books fakkits do that makes shyt unbearable

Wolverine being 5'4 won't suddenly elevate the movie and/or performance
 

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
36,805
Reputation
-3,531
Daps
82,827
Everybody knows comic book Wolverine is a leprechaun, but you don't need to be 5'4 to play him "properly".

That's the type of nitpicking comic books fakkits do that makes shyt unbearable

Wolverine being 5'4 won't suddenly elevate the movie and/or performance
Lol, saying this is like saying it's okay when 5 foot 6 cruise played jack reacher when his physical intimidation and size is part of the character.

You don't want to respect the property use something else, but wolverine is a midget. That's part of his character.

What you are saying is the equivalent of getting lotr and saying we won't use cgi or midgets to have hobbits and dwarves be small as hell because it doesn't matter and if anyone complains about it they are why no one respects fans of the property. Ie it's stupid and illogical on it's face.
 

Uchiha God

Veteran
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
14,404
Reputation
6,656
Daps
88,876
Reppin
NULL
Lol, saying this is like saying it's okay when 5 foot 6 cruise played jack reacher when his physical intimidation and size is part of the character.

You don't want to respect the property use something else, but wolverine is a midget. That's part of his character.

What you are saying is the equivalent of getting lotr and saying we won't use cgi or midgets to have hobbits and dwarves be small as hell because it doesn't matter and if anyone complains about it they are why no one respects fans of the property. Ie it's stupid and illogical on it's face.

If I say "what is 2 and 2?" - most people with sense will answer "4" - because context would have led them there. A fakkit might say "22" because he's a dikkriding fakkit who loves the attention.

The point being - the physical portrayal of hobbits is crucial to their character in a way that being 5'4 isn't crucial to Wolverine's, as corroborated by his successful on-screen live action depictions for the past two decades - and this isn't reflective of "respect" or lack thereof for the property/fans.
 

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
36,805
Reputation
-3,531
Daps
82,827
If I say "what is 2 and 2?" - most people with sense will answer "4" - because context would have led them there. A fakkit might say "22" because he's a dikkriding fakkit who loves the attention.

The point being - the physical portrayal of hobbits is crucial to their character in a way that being 5'4 isn't crucial to Wolverine's, as corroborated by his successful on-screen live action depictions for the past two decades - and this isn't reflective of "respect" or lack thereof for the property/fans.

You said something stupid. I called you out on the stupidity of what you said, you first paragraph trying to act like you were taken out of context is an embarrassing attempt to save face. Stop saying stupid shyt and if you do just own up to it.

You made your point and it is foolish because like hobbits, like dwarves, like jack reacher, wolverines height is crucial to the character. Now they may not have had to hire a short actor, they could correct for height cgi wise, but to me they need to get his height right

Jack reacher movies were successful with Tom cruise, they fukked up the height to make a Tom cruise movie and fans of the property were not happy about it. Singer destroyed the X-Men as characters but had successful movies, profitability doesn't equate with respecting source material and it isn't a pass for ignoring it
 

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
65,061
Reputation
12,730
Daps
91,081
Reppin
CHICAGO
1*YNyVy1YRa11ouEGQDWIi3g.gif

3ee188b6d1c6dc59c89f41b51d95c0d94a072c2ar1-540-323_hq.gif

deadpool2-shatterstar.gif

i fukkin died in the theater to this, because as a kid I thought Shatterstar and Nate Grey were the stupidest fukking looking characters in history.


Stop.

This is revisionist hate.

Shatter star was fye as a character model before liefeld was shyt on.

Plus people who talk all this shyt about liefled. Are not and I repeat. Were not working for marvel monthly.
as a fukk'n outsider art self taught teen professional penciler.
with a chart changing and topping book on new mutants. That numerous others always failed at consistently.

All the liefeld hate is revision. After he blew up.
Originally all that liefled early new mutants shyt was fye.

We can go compare other books on the shelf at the time too.

All the mass exodus hate for liefeld is disengenuine as fukk.
By some people not even good enough. to get a booth a comic on to sign one autograph.

Mostly all the people talking shyt about liefeld. We're all fans who had an exhibited Mass exodus. That if anything if they were so dope. They would have fixed the issues liefeld had in his own work on their own and made another image if they were all so dope.

People critiquing liefeld.
I ask.

Where are your marvel monthly published books In your teens at.

Most at that age were not even good enough to get a write back that held promise from Jim shooter back then.

So people hating on liefeld. Where are your outsider art self taught teen pro marvel monthly comissioned pages at. That changed the trajectory of an entire industry at. Where are they.

Let us see them if you so dope.



Art Barr
 
Last edited:

Uchiha God

Veteran
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
14,404
Reputation
6,656
Daps
88,876
Reppin
NULL
You said something stupid. I called you out on the stupidity of what you said, you first paragraph trying to act like you were taken out of context is an embarrassing attempt to save face. Stop saying stupid shyt and if you do just own up to it.

You made your point and it is foolish because like hobbits, like dwarves, like jack reacher, wolverines height is crucial to the character. Now they may not have had to hire a short actor, they could correct for height cgi wise, but to me they need to get his height right

Jack reacher movies were successful with Tom cruise, they fukked up the height to make a Tom cruise movie and fans of the property were not happy about it. Singer destroyed the X-Men as characters but had successful movies, profitability doesn't equate with respecting source material and it isn't a pass for ignoring it

I'm not trying to save face. I called you a fakkit from the go - why would I then attempt to save face for you? :what:

You simply lack the ability to read context clues, and reply as if conversations exist in a vacuum - thus you failing to understand that my initial post posited Wolverine's height isn't crucial for an accurate depiction of the character. It's also why you wrongly equated "successful" with "profitability" - when the argument we're having is about subjective factors and how they are presented/framed as criticisms. You need dummy disclaimers at every corner, it's why you couldn't deduce what successful meant in this context.

see - fakkitry :hubie:
 
Top