This happened in 1965 after civil rights so context is very important.
- Black women opted for individual security over collective advancement
- The government essentially incentivized broken homes
- Black men couldn't get gainful employment/investment due to hiring/lending practices
- With No black companies. No black infrastructure. No economic base/unity.
- Black men resort to crime and gang culture flourishes
Does this sound familiar ?
In order to build you need your women to be
submissive and on the same page.
That way the men can lead and the women can nurture and have a legacy/wealth left to them for future generations.
White power structure pro-actively engineered this from happening decades ago...
YOU'VE HAD A MATRIARCHY FOR DECADES
HOW ARE WE HOLDING YOU BACK IN 2015 ?
The U.K. doesn't have a black middle class and their history is entirely different.
As far as i'm aware they never had a huge civil rights movement there
So how is this relevant to black gender relations in the U.S. ?
" The reason these unmarried men were being kicked out is because they largely served no purpose outside of insemination. The non productive black man was optional and he continues to be this way till this day "
Actually it's black women who've lost their utility to many successful black men
that's more to do with the belligerent "independence"/reluctance to submit ....
They figure they can still have have black offspring without black women :sadbabybreh:
but all this was engineered decades ago so I can't blame subsequent generations for the betrayal
of their grandmothers...nor you being loyal to your own ignorance...
but do tell....with all this strength/independence.........
HOW ARE WE HOLDING YOU BACK ?:pharrell: