PHRASES IN DICTIONARIES????!?!
I'm done.
*edit* No, I'll respond to the rest later. You're right, I can't let dumb shyt go unchecked.
Will God die out once we attain immortality?
- Thread starter Swagnificent
- Start date
PHRASES IN DICTIONARIES????!?!
I'm done.
*edit* No, I'll respond to the rest later. You're right, I can't let dumb shyt go unchecked.
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
Its interesting how atheists will believe in creation as it relates to scientists duplicating what God has already done using his materials(whats already been created) in a lab, but still cant fathom the thought of actually being a creation, of Gods.
Its so demonic, friends.
Its so demonic, friends.
Its interesting how atheists will believe in creation as it relates to scientists duplicating what God has already done using his materials(whats already been created) in a lab, but still cant fathom the thought of actually being a creation, of Gods.
Its so demonic, friends.
The thought is fathomable, friend. It's just illogical.
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
Human logic is illogical.
funny you say that, since humans wrote that bible you worship. which is a very illogical book
Blackout
just your usual nerdy brotha
According to who you? I'm going off of the original definition.
Because any other position than agnosticism require rejection or acceptance..
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
ltheghost
Payin Debts.... N40
Now don't get me wrong, I think death is just another part of life, the natural order of things but, if humans find a way to achieve immortality...They can't stay on Earth anymore. Over crowding will become a HUGE problem. Send them to Mars or space exploration. They can't stay here anymore.
illogical based on your own opinion, good thing your opinion isn't fact.
so do You really believe that a more logical explanation is a natural explanation void of intelligence that happen solely by chance for entirely no reason... is more logical?
You find it acceptable to believe that your opinion is more logical and opposite views aren't logical- without humans even knowing if nature requires no intelligence in it's design or formation.
You wish to claim the side of logic while violating the statistical reasoning and the probability that inanimate matter eventually developed planets, stars and animate intelligence creations. . I just don't think we can ignore the seemingly designed qualities of the universe.
I know people say that, that is all just an illusion of design... however, I think that scientifically baseless (scientific method can't be used) assumptions of randomness, go out the window when a pattern, set physical laws, observable signs of design, and created existing intelligent organisms are introduced.
Mathematical equations can be used to see patterns in DNA and earthquake predictions... mathematics is the only universal truth. Every single Idea you have about the universe, creation, nature, etc is based on non-facts and loose theories... not one of them can claim to be a fact or truth. I will admit that, even though everyone naturally assumes a designer when they see a design in anything, anywhere, in every aspect of life; 'design implies a designer' isn't by itself definite proof of a creator of a universe. But assumed randomness about something that seemed designed is illogical. If I used your logic, I would see writing on my Son's wall and not assume that he drew it, but assume it might have appeared by chance. Randomness means lack of pattern or predictability in events. So it's not logical to call that viewpoint illogical.
I mean we are typing online... there are idioms in the online dictionaries. If it were more popular then it would be in a dictionary idiot (but the phrase is unnecessary, so it will never catch on, even as an oxymoron)
IF you are at home 'bent out of shape' typing some 'bs', getting upset because people have different opinions than you and you are having difficulty proving why your pov is correct... and your Guy Friend comes over to talk with you 'eyeball to eyeball' and u guys start 'roughhousing' you could end up with a 'charley horse'. You need a 'crash course' in semantics lame.
NTM agnostic: One who is skeptical about the existence of God but does not profess true atheism. AKA no need to make up phrases. but i'm done though, u can respond to the other one if u like, but peace.
Faith is faith. None of what you've presented above truly conforms to logic as we understand it now. You can't make faith into logic. If you want to believe in it, you have to accept it as a faith-based belief and keep it moving.
point is, none of what you are suggesting Truly comforms to logic as we understand it now. First off, logic is logic; there is no "as we understand". And Most of what I said is logical and is applied to non-religious ideas more often; rarely is applied to religion or faith because those things do not require such things. So you bringing up faith in that context is conforming to avoidance as we understand it now. Not arguing, just saying it litterally wasn't logical to call his pov illogical.
You think human conciousness translates to you blacking out and then waking up like robocop in a human shell. You will need your brain in a jar spliced into a robot suit of some kind. What preserves your brain? Formaldahyde. What guarantees your brain will last in that fluid? Flesh decays at undeterminable rates. You will die, eventually. You will need technology to escape earth before the sun goes supernova. YOu will need to avoid the perils of space travel that could render your robot shell useless and send you hurtling through space forever, immortal, waiting to hit another planet in a few Deca-Trillion light years.Good luck with that, friend. You dont want that life.
And.....there you have it folks
You think human conciousness translates to you blacking out and then waking up like robocop in a human shell. You will need your brain in a jar spliced into a robot suit of some kind. What preserves your brain? Formaldahyde. What guarantees your brain will last in that fluid? Flesh decays at undeterminable rates. You will die, eventually. You will need technology to escape earth before the sun goes supernova. YOu will need to avoid the perils of space travel that could render your robot shell useless and send you hurtling through space forever, immortal, waiting to hit another planet in a few Deca-Trillion light years.
formaldehyde(and similarly ethanol) just preserves the physical appearance
and id say you could predict when someone will die if you knew what kind of lifestyle they would have + eliminated outside risks
it will never exist on the small scale, invest in natural gas
you heard it here first
intilectual recipricol
Killin fake hip hop
this is stupid.
atheism is exactly what the other nicca said.
all the descriptions of a god are absurd and we see no reason to assume there is a god. If someone provides any evidence for a god then it will be addressed. As for current models, they are moronic and ought be rejected.