Why do women want to label interactions so quickly?

[Neuromancer]

 

[Mowgli]

 

[Jean Jacket]

00000000000000000000000000023389



bishop c7

U sure breh?

 

[Blackrogue]

00000000000000000000000000023389

U sure breh?

 

[Neuromancer]

 

[Jean Jacket]

00000000000000000000000000023389

 

[Blackrogue]

U sure breh?

your move

 

[Jean Jacket]

your move

 

[Mowgli]

 

[Jean Jacket]

a lot of daps for a non existant move

its blacks turn and his pawn is already on d5.

the sequence was likely 1. d4 d5 2. c4.. which now leads into whatever systems black wants to defend with.
he can anchor the pawn with something in the c or e lane. he can anchor it with the Knight but trade a center pawn for a side one. he can start making arrangements that once the gambit is taken he can hold on to his pawn using the a and b pawns. But most secure it badly and if you play e3 as white and not have Knight to F3 you can slide your queen there and capture his rook and destroying the whole left side

It's the concept of what women want... To own you early in the game... Stop making this wierd...

 

[Strawberry]

Yes. Men and women are different. Why is it so difficult to understand this concept? There is nothing satisfying about what you can give away. If women wanted to, they could have sex with a different man every single day of the year.

Stop trying to do what men do.



Women are incredibly straight forward when they want a relationship to be defined or pushed forward. That point is redundant considering the title and subject of the thread.



You're responding to an argument I never made. I never said all women are "using" men, but...

Connection =/= Security
Even when women have a strong emotional connection with a guy and even when the vibe matches, most women are thinking "is this dude going to lock me down." In the back of her mind she needs to know if buddy is serious, because if he is not, she is out there lost without a plan, moving in the wrong direction.

That's why the stereotype of a woman pushing for marriage and a man holding out exist. That's why when you visit your mammy (assuming you don't still live with her) and talk about your "man" she is always ask how close he is to something official. Women like that security, no matter what type of connection or vibe they have.

Guys don't have biological clocks, guys don't really fall in love the same way as women (again, men and women are different), and therefore, a dude can have a great connection and not be pressed to move it along. That's just our nature, it's who we are. This is why women often have a stronger emotional connection with one type of guy (a "bad boy" or "nice guy" or "leader") but end up settling down with another type (a "provider").

This is knowledge, not hostility baby girl.

I can do whatever the fukk I want, baby boy.



If I want to fukk a guy with no emotional attachment and no expectations of having a future with him, I am free to do so.

It's not a "man thing". It's a human thing.



So what, men can be attracted to thots/models but end up with a woman who can take care of him & the kids.

Everybody has a type they're attracted to, not just women.

When considering a significant other I never think "is he gonna lock me down?"

I'm thinkin shyt like "is this guy real enough for me?" "Would this guy make a good father one day
?" "Could I grow with this person?", "Would I be happy waking up everyday next to this person?" "Is this the person I want to have by my side while I'm riding this adventurous roller coaster through life?" "Can this guy satisfy all my sexual needs?"

"Is he gonna lock me down?" comes way after. I've never even made it that far yet. Much too serious of a question for a free spirit like me.




I think you're just having a hard time accepting that men and women are not so different.

 

[Action Mike]

I dont think so, if a nikka finds out you're talking to other nikkas and he don't step his game up to impress you then you can bush him. In my experience nikkas find out theres comptetition and get on that shyt you nikkas be on trynna be the winner. I have had nikkas fall back tho but no nikka try to treat me as a busdown cuz I guess I exude that thats not even an option.

if a breh finds out he aint number 1, it bushes
fukk all that other gladiator competing shyt
waste of time
and who the hell are you

 

[Blackrogue]

It's the concept of what women want... To own you early in the game... Stop making this wierd...

you knew I was about to chase your white bytch around like I'm simping
or she owe me money and I'm pimping



but yeah I got the concept

when I was in scum baggery mode, or in a mode of let's just see where we float to, and what we are will become apparent mode.. I used to get that question. many times from women who were also running game, and trying to keep you to themselves when from a relationship stand point you can't tolerate some of their flaws.. typical would smash but not wife.

other chicks would refer to me as their boyfriend when we havent even agreed on that.. I'd just but I was really scum bagging seeing five chicks at the same time then replace them with a new set of five.. I don't know how I did it.

recently though as opposed to the not declaring intentions I told this woman I'm gonna chase her mouth until she belongs to me. Then she let me kiss her and touch her breasts under her clothes in the secluded section of the bar we were in.

but 2016 looking like I might be back in that mode unless I bag something worth settling and being faithful with ( which I have a few in mind).. its already mid Jan and I've made out with ten chicks already.. 20 kill everything looking like it'll be messy

they should have never given a young nikka money
its made the biggest leap for me in logistics

 

[Neuromancer]

 

[RAX 010]