I'm not here to insult anyone. I mean... why should white people care about egypt when they have Rome, which was 1000 times more impressive and it conquered Egypt.
you must be out of your mind. egypt was the first, no one in rome built anything remotely as significant as the great pyramids with the lack of technology and it is also 4,000 yrs old, rome was 1,000. rome adopted from the greeks, who adopted from the egyptians. no egypt, no rome.
The Facts don't agree with the afrocentric version of history, so somehow it's a conspiracy. Ramses clearly has a Caucasoid shaped skull, and all Available evidence suggests that the royal family carried Y-dna R1b. That's not african in Orgin. My Y-dna is Closer to R1b than it is to E1 and I'm from asia.
the black man is the oldest. I think what people forget, is that at one time, we were here when nobody else was. now, with that said, nobody ever wants to highlight those 10,000 years of innovation, migration, etc. or that egypt's FIRST dynasties were afrocentric (see menes), or that india's first civilization in india so happened to be the first settlers from africa, before the indo-aryan civilization.
I also find it strange that you can get the dna make up of ramsees, but why not the first dynasty? what are they hiding.
you say we are the slaves of the world, but are you sure that's not what they want you to believe? we're not buying the propaganda anymore, and the sooner african emerges and begins digging up it's own fossils will get to the bottom of things.
btw. there are SEVERAL great african civilizations, from Golden Kingdom of Ghana, Great Zimbabwe, to the Mali Empire, Songhai Empire. How come we can't get better, more detailed information on these? but we for damn sure have a long thick book on Rome. (you think whites have a deeper richer history, maybe currently, but overall, not by a long shot)
When you talk to them about african civilization you get something like "yea but the mali empire got big because the muslims came with livestock and taught them how too...."
but is this not what egypt was to the greeks? is it a coincidence the spanish discovered west africa and the americas 2 years after the arabs left (leaving behind their naval maps and tactics)
everything seems a bit strange that one is really hell bent on proving we are inferior, when the facts remains, we are equal.
again, if you want to go there, we can highlight how ethiopia has been literate for 4,000 years, yet the anglo saxon, germanics hadn't become literate until 1AD, since introduced by the romans. Before that, the british were living in huts and couldn't read or write, yet east africa could do all the above. we never twist it like that do we? we never see it like that?
well sir, I am conscious.