scientific findings published in a book
I will take that over some Muhammad letters which has not been verified by any reputable archeological institute.
Why Do People Use Terms Like B.C/A.D If You Dont Believe In Jesus?
- Thread starter Dirty_Jerz
- Start date
I will take that over some Muhammad letters which has not been verified by any reputable archeological institute.
You're all over the place here. Your original assertion was that there are serious and prevalent challenges to Jesus' existence. You provided a link that said the exact opposite. All this other stuff is just fluff
Occams Razor can't save you. And there is plenty of non-biblical evidence of Jesus' existence as well
2 Up 2 Down
Veteran
Turin Shroud may not be a medieval fake as it dates back to Christ's lifetime, say scientists | Mail Online
Got any face pics of Muhammad which science and tests have confirmed? :obama3: This picture is what let to current picture illustrations of Jesus.
SMH at letters 'written' by Muhammad. :obama3:
You are too smart to believe that
"A"implies a singular theory.
Saying something doesn't exist is a singular theory. "Christ myth theories" refers to multiple theories about when/how/where he lived. Within those theories there is the theory that he didn't exist at all. That theory has been thoroughly debunked by history.
Everytime you look at the clock or calender, you are acknowledging the existence of Christ :obama3: AD/BC
Must suck for you atheists
You're all over the place here. Your original assertion was that there are serious and prevalent challenges to Jesus' existence. You provided a link that said the exact opposite. All this other stuff is just fluff
Occams Razor can't save you. And there is plenty of non-biblical evidence of Jesus' existence as well
I said...
and then
my point of posting the wiki link and talking about "Muhammad Myth Theories" (and no i wasn't trying to make a fukking point, or move the bar, by including an "s" at the end), was that you won't find a wiki article for "Muhammad Myth Theories". and that's why claimed it's more "prevalent"
Broke Wave
The GOAT
what the fukk 
I've literally never heard someone question the EXISTENCE of Muhammad... his name is Muhammed IBN ABDULLAH which means son of Abdullah... who would insinuate that an entire family in a famous tribe, whom thousands of people saw and interacted with, who had children and literally volumes detailing his sayings and the way he acted and dressed and lived would be all a fabrication?
Even the most adamant anti-Islamist would NEVER deny his literal EXISTENCE as a human being... this is probably the dumbest thing I have ever read.
"A"implies a singular theory.
Saying something doesn't exist is a singular theory. "Christ myth theories" refers to multiple theories about when/how/where he lived. Within those theories there is the theory that he didn't exist at all. That theory has been thoroughly debunked by history.
yeah, I've never heard 1 serious argument. I think most people might think that implies that I haven't heard more than 1 serious argument either
unless you're on some troll shyt:
"I haven't heard a serious argument..."
"...I've heard two" 
lol, I don't have scientific evidence of my great grand father either.. but I know he existed because I knew him. I also know that even if his body was burned up, he's published, has military, birth and death records. There is as much, if not more, evidence of Muhammad as there is of my great grandfather.
I never said Jesus never existed,... but you probably think the ripples in the water of your bubble bath every night depict a clear picture of Mary holding baby Jesus. You see things how you want and I'll see the truth.
John 16:7-14
if you don't see the flaws in your logic I don't know what to tell you. First off the existence of a wiki page does not indicate prevalence. Second just because no one has created a wiki page titled "Muhammad myth theories" doesn't mean that there aren't challenges to his existence/story. Third the "Christ myth theories" wiki page does not support your claims that there are serious arguments against Jesus' existence, in fact it speaks to the contrary. Even among the people who support "Christ myth theories" no one believes he didn't exist.
I've literally never heard someone question the EXISTENCE of Muhammad... his name is Muhammed IBN ABDULLAH which means son of Abdullah... who would insinuate that an entire family in a famous tribe, whom thousands of people saw and interacted with, who had children and literally volumes detailing his sayings and the way he acted and dressed and lived would be all a fabrication?
Even the most adamant anti-Islamist would NEVER deny his literal EXISTENCE as a human being... this is probably the dumbest thing I have ever read.
Dude Islam is too new(compared to the other Abrahamic religions) to be considered seriously around these parts. Muslims are not even allowed to draw Muhammad :obama3:
No scientific evidence by any renowned archeologists have been found of Muhammad...EVER.
yeah, I've never heard 1 serious argument. I think most people might think that implies that I haven't heard more than 1 serious argument either
unless you're on some troll shyt:
"I haven't heard a serious argument..."
"...I've heard two"
You're just not getting it.
If I say "The Coli doesn't exist" that is a singular theory. Either something exists or it didn't exist. Where the multiple theories come in is explaining the existance
"Coli myth theories" would entail multiple theories about c00ns, it certs, and cacs, one of them could be that the coli doesn't exist, but that is still a singular theory held within the overall "coli myth theories"
You were not talking about "Christ myth theories" you were talking about the singular theory that Christ doesn't exist. Two very different ideas.
Broke Wave
The GOAT
This is utter insanity... this is not even a valid argument against Islam. I have read thousands of anti-Islamic posts and pages but I have never in my life heard the argument that a man who was literally seen by thousands of people, had children, had thousands of companions known as "The Sahaba", and a very big extended family, with volumes written about his life with multiple sources never existed. This is not even a fringe argument, it is something you probably totally invented as a troll.
And Islam is not a new religion, it is the religion of all the prophets, including Jesus of Nazareth.
it's not conclusive, but I think it offers an indication
I really don't think what I said is particularly controversial. it's a comparison of probabilities, initially based on my personal experience with the subjects