WHO’S HOUSE?! BRON’S HOUSE!! WHO’S HOUSE?! BRON’S HOUSE!!: Your GOAT franchise Boss Angeles Lakers 2024 Reality TV offseason Thread

Mars

Superstar
Joined
Jun 7, 2014
Messages
9,922
Reputation
512
Daps
23,100
=
Please dont do this breh. Blaming Dlo for our loss to the Nuggets last year is so shameful. Lebron being outplayed and outproduced by Jamal Murray is unacceptable.


This nikka said Lebron nearly gave us what Jokic gave us. How can he gave us what Jokic gave us if he couldnt even give us what Murray gave us?

28/9/10/52% on a bad foot vs 28/14/12/50%

Had Dlo hit a couple of baskets Lebron's asst total would've been right there with Jokic.

And I clearly said it's going to come down to Dlo and the role players, not just Dlo
 

CantStop

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,161
Reputation
8,820
Daps
203,735
Please dont do this breh. Blaming Dlo for our loss to the Nuggets last year is so shameful. Lebron being outplayed and outproduced by Jamal Murray is unacceptable.


This nikka said Lebron nearly gave us what Jokic gave us. How can he gave us what Jokic gave us if he couldnt even give us what Murray gave us?

Exactly.

LeStans trying to rewrite history and blaming role players instead of admitting that our main guy got outplayed by Jamal Murray. We don't even need to compare him to Jokic.

Lebron was also historically bad from 3 the first 3 games. He was 3-19 from 3 his first 3 games before his flukey game 4 which didn't matter cause the series was over anyways. Jamal Murray came thru in the 4th quarters, Lebron didn't. Ironically the way the series ended was an accurate portrayal of what went wrong. Jokic made clutch baskets and LeBron was getting clamped.
 

jaydawg08

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
8,145
Reputation
875
Daps
20,050
Exactly.

LeStans trying to rewrite history and blaming role players instead of admitting that our main guy got outplayed by Jamal Murray. We don't even need to compare him to Jokic.

Lebron was also historically bad from 3 the first 3 games. He was 3-19 from 3 his first 3 games before his flukey game 4 which didn't matter cause the series was over anyways. Jamal Murray came thru in the 4th quarters, Lebron didn't. Ironically the way the series ended was an accurate portrayal of what went wrong. Jokic made clutch baskets and LeBron was getting clamped.
idk why people are pretending that Murray didn’t put up all time great stats that series.. put it up with anyone in NBA history and it’s some elite production. He wasn’t playing like just a normal star

Really what it came down to role players not able to make shots (DLO) therefore Lebron needing to exert more than he should have while tiring himself out while also being injured

DLO averaged 11 points LESS that series than in the regular season.. tell me what was the point differential in each of the losses?
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,740
Reppin
the ether
Rhakim showing once again how he’s the biggest dumbass on this forum. Kupchak was one of the worst GMs in the league. Dude said artest was a good move lmao. And then bro listed a trade that didn’t happen(CP3), a trade that was a failure by game 1(Nash injury) which cost us years of draft picks and a trade that was a failure after year 1(Dwight).


Because you're not bright enough to do anything other than Monday Morning Quarterback. Everyone sees that in every game thread, where you say stupid shyt every fukking day that gets proved wrong. "AD is completely useless!" then AD finishes with 30 and 15 while leading the team to a win. "It's another fake comeback" then the Lakers make another great comeback and win. "This was a scheduled loss from the beginning, we can't beat them", then the Lakers win the game. You make it obvious that you know nothing about what is happening while it is happening, then you judge it all after the fact based solely on the dumb Canadian biases you have.


All of Kupchak's moves for Ariza, Pau, Artest, CP3, Dwight, Nash were seen as great moves at the time, they were almost UNIVERSALLY praised. The Ariza, Pau and Artest moves helped them win two titles, the Dwight and Nash moves didn't work out but not because he didn't put enough talent on the team. And losing out on CP3 had NOTHING to do with Kupchak, he can only negotiate a monster deal, he had no way of knowing that the league would veto it for being too good a deal. A general manager can only control who he acquires, he can't control what others do after the fact.

Lakers were the preseason favorites in 6-7 of the 16 years that Kupchak was GM. How the fukk is that possible for the "worst GM in the league"? That was Kupchak's job, and he did it. After that it's the responsibility of the players to perform, and they only won 4 of those seasons. That's not on him.

Steve Nash to Los Angeles Lakers: Grading the Trade for Both Sides

Lakers Grade: A
This trade was a brilliant move by Kupchak. Not only does he put a sharpshooter who can distribute the rock—Nash—with a guard who is an elite all-around scorer—Kobe Bryant—but he was also able to do it without jeopardizing his team's title hopes.


Dwight Howard Trade Analysis: Winners and Losers of 4-Team Blockbuster

Winner: Los Angeles Lakers​

Essentially, the Lakers just traded a first-round pick (at earliest in 2017, due to the Steve Nash trade) and Bynum for Howard.
Who in their right mind wouldn't do that deal?

The fact L.A. managed to spare Gasol from being involved in the trade makes them the clear, unquestioned winner here.



Dwight Howard to LA Lakers: Trade Analysis, Grade and Twitter Reaction


Grades
Lakers: A

The Los Angeles Lakers are now the team to beat in the NBA. Nash, Kobe, Metta World Peace, Gasol and Howard make up perhaps the best starting unit in the league—although their bench depth leaves something to be desired.

Regardless, GM Mitch Kupchak had no choice but to pull the trigger on this trade, as his squad had been eliminated early in the playoffs in the past two seasons and desperately needed a shakeup.

After acquiring Nash earlier in the offseason, the Lakers completed their transformation back to the top of the league by netting DH12.



Gasol trade earns Lakers top grade

It has been well documented that the Lakers obtained Pau Gasol through thievery. Not only did they get the former All-Star, but in the process, they got rid of Kwame Brown.

Brown actually had a desirable “expiring contract,” as well as an undesirable expiring career. The Lakers’ trade turned out to be so spectacularly one-sided that newbie Grizzlies general manager Chris Wallace was gun shy with trading Mike Miller, a player unnecessary for a rebuilding team, because of potential criticism that he might get in any deal with him.




Do you seriously think the majority opinion at the time was that Ariza, Pau, Artest, CP3, Dwight, and Nash were all mistakes when they were announced? You trying to talk shyt about acquiring Dwight, who had been 1st-team All-NBA for four straight years, Nash, who had been an All-Star the year before, or Artest, who had taken the Lakers to 7 in the WCSF just a couple months before he signed, is nonsense.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 15, 2012
Messages
13,460
Reputation
5,844
Daps
61,591
Reppin
#LWO
LeStans trying to rewrite history and blaming role players instead of admitting that our main guy got outplayed by Jamal Murray. We don't even need to compare him to Jokic.

Lebron was also historically bad from 3 the first 3 games. He was 3-19 from 3 his first 3 games before his flukey game 4 which didn't matter cause the series was over anyways. Jamal Murray came thru in the 4th quarters, Lebron didn't. Ironically the way the series ended was an accurate portrayal of what went wrong. Jokic made clutch baskets and LeBron was getting clamped.
He was shooting 16% from three in the first three games . There is a direct correlation between going down an insurmountable 0-3 deficit and his historically awful three point shooting.

Lebron's three point shooting the first three games

0-4 game one
0-6 game two
3-9 game three


Do yall want to be reminded how damn well Murray was in the first three games? I know the truth hurts but face it. That loss was on Lebron.

4-8 game one
6-14 game two (42%)
5-11 game three

@Mars
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 15, 2012
Messages
13,460
Reputation
5,844
Daps
61,591
Reppin
#LWO
idk why people are pretending that Murray didn’t put up all time great stats that series.. put it up with anyone in NBA history and it’s some elite production. He wasn’t playing like just a normal star

Really what it came down to role players not able to make shots (DLO) therefore Lebron needing to exert more than he should have while tiring himself out while also being injured

DLO averaged 11 points LESS that series than in the regular season.. tell me what was the point differential in each of the losses?
Stop moving the goalposts . Lebron did not match or exceed Jamal Murray's production which is unacceptable. how on earth can Lebron James be outperfromed by a second option? That should never happen. And to add insult to injury Lebron shot historically bad from three
 

CantStop

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,161
Reputation
8,820
Daps
203,735
Because you're not bright enough to do anything other than Monday Morning Quarterback. Everyone sees that in every game thread, where you say stupid shyt every fukking day that gets proved wrong. "AD is completely useless!" then AD finishes with 30 and 15 while leading the team to a win. "It's another fake comeback" then the Lakers make another great comeback and win. "This was a scheduled loss from the beginning, we can't beat them", then the Lakers win the game. You make it obvious that you know nothing about what is happening while it is happening, then you judge it all after the fact based solely on the dumb Canadian biases you have.


All of Kupchak's moves for Ariza, Pau, Artest, CP3, Dwight, Nash were seen as great moves at the time, they were almost UNIVERSALLY praised. The Ariza, Pau and Artest moves helped them win two titles, the Dwight and Nash moves didn't work out but not because he didn't put enough talent on the team. And losing out on CP3 had NOTHING to do with Kupchak, he can only negotiate a monster deal, he had no way of knowing that the league would veto it for being too good a deal. A general manager can only control who he acquires, he can't control what others do after the fact.

Lakers were the preseason favorites in 6-7 of the 16 years that Kupchak was GM. How the fukk is that possible for the "worst GM in the league"? That was Kupchak's job, and he did it. After that it's the responsibility of the players to perform, and they only won 4 of those seasons. That's not on him.

Steve Nash to Los Angeles Lakers: Grading the Trade for Both Sides

Lakers Grade: A
This trade was a brilliant move by Kupchak. Not only does he put a sharpshooter who can distribute the rock—Nash—with a guard who is an elite all-around scorer—Kobe Bryant—but he was also able to do it without jeopardizing his team's title hopes.


Dwight Howard Trade Analysis: Winners and Losers of 4-Team Blockbuster

Winner: Los Angeles Lakers​

Essentially, the Lakers just traded a first-round pick (at earliest in 2017, due to the Steve Nash trade) and Bynum for Howard.
Who in their right mind wouldn't do that deal?

The fact L.A. managed to spare Gasol from being involved in the trade makes them the clear, unquestioned winner here.



Dwight Howard to LA Lakers: Trade Analysis, Grade and Twitter Reaction


Grades
Lakers: A

The Los Angeles Lakers are now the team to beat in the NBA. Nash, Kobe, Metta World Peace, Gasol and Howard make up perhaps the best starting unit in the league—although their bench depth leaves something to be desired.

Regardless, GM Mitch Kupchak had no choice but to pull the trigger on this trade, as his squad had been eliminated early in the playoffs in the past two seasons and desperately needed a shakeup.

After acquiring Nash earlier in the offseason, the Lakers completed their transformation back to the top of the league by netting DH12.



Gasol trade earns Lakers top grade

It has been well documented that the Lakers obtained Pau Gasol through thievery. Not only did they get the former All-Star, but in the process, they got rid of Kwame Brown.

Brown actually had a desirable “expiring contract,” as well as an undesirable expiring career. The Lakers’ trade turned out to be so spectacularly one-sided that newbie Grizzlies general manager Chris Wallace was gun shy with trading Mike Miller, a player unnecessary for a rebuilding team, because of potential criticism that he might get in any deal with him.




Do you seriously think the majority opinion at the time was that Ariza, Pau, Artest, CP3, Dwight, and Nash were all mistakes when they were announced? You trying to talk shyt about acquiring Dwight, who had been 1st-team All-NBA for four straight years, Nash, who had been an All-Star the year before, or Artest, who had taken the Lakers to 7 in the WCSF just a couple months before he signed, is nonsense.

This is ironic considering y’all complain about Pelinka and our roster yet we were universally praised as having the best offseason in 2023. Everything you post is just surface level nonsense. You post transactions and other peoples thoughts because you have none of your own. I was on Lakersground and the Coli, we all hated that Nash deal. He was nearly 40 and it was evident he was going to break down. That’s not hindsight but you wouldn’t know that. I was the biggest Bynum fan on this site so how the fukk can you tell me that I would think the Dwight deal was a good move. I thought Bynum was the next great big man, he wasn’t for injury reasons but I never wanted that bum Dwight either.

I feel you but I can't STAND another 0/0/1 in 25 mins games from Steve Blake. I hate him so much.

Honestly, this team has so MANY holes. Team was on a downhill when we let Ariza go. I don't care if we won the next season, it was still a mistake. that 09 team was beautiful brehs :sadcam:

You know for every dumb shyt you say, I always have a counter. I NEVER wanted Ariza to go. We whoop the Celtics ass in 2010 with Ariza. Why don’t you talk about Kupchak surrounding Kobes prime years with G league junk from 2004-2007. I don’t care what goofy ass writer says, it was a dumb move then. Bu bu but they gave Kupchak an A. What kinda weirdo logic is that?
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,740
Reppin
the ether
LeStans trying to rewrite history and blaming role players instead of admitting that our main guy got outplayed by Jamal Murray. We don't even need to compare him to Jokic.

WTF does Jamal Murray have to do with LeBron? Was Bron tasked with guarding Murray? Do they play the same position? Did LeBron guard Murray? Was LeBron responsible for acquiring guards who couldn't defend Murray for shyt?

You don't care about jack shyt that actually happens on the basketball court, you care SOLELY about narratives.


* You don't blame D-Lo for averaging 6ppg on 32% shooting and going 2-15 from 3pt for the series

* You don't blame Dennis for averaging 7ppg on 37% shooting

* You don't blame all the Laker guards for getting shredded by Murray regularly

* You don't blame Vanderbilt and Beasley for being unplayable in the series

* You don't blame AD for being incapable of guarding Jokic one-on-one without getting manhandled


Instead, you blame the guy who averaged 28-10-10 for 52% shooting in the series and played pretty good defense on a bad foot, SOLELY because he missed a few threes the first two games and a player he doesn't even guard went off. You're clueless.

You won't find a single other time in NBA history where a player who averaged anywhere even close to those numbers (nearly 30-10-10 on over 50% shooting) was blamed for losing the series.




Lebron was also historically bad from 3 the first 3 games.

This is a lie. He missed his shots in the first two games (0-10 combined) and was good in the next two games (3-9 and 4-7). You trying to shoehorn Game 3 in along with the first two games is more of the disingenuous bullshyt you always do.





Ironically the way the series ended was an accurate portrayal of what went wrong. Jokic made clutch baskets and LeBron was getting clamped.

Yeah, when fukking Ham decides to play an injured 38yo LeBron for 48 minutes straight and ride him all game long to the tune of 40-10-9, what the fukk do you think is going to happen in the final minute?


NO ONE IN the LEAGUE is being played for 48 minutes straight anymore, especially not anyone who is supposed to carry the load that LeBron carries. AD only played 40 minutes in that game. Murray played 43. Gordon, who was guarding LeBron on the play and is 11 years younger than him, played just 40. Even Jokic, who is over a decade younger than Bron and hardly ever had to run or jump due to the nature of his game, still got an extended break in the 2nd quarter. Playing LeBron for 48 minutes straight resulted in the exact predictable outcome.
 

CantStop

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,161
Reputation
8,820
Daps
203,735
WTF does Jamal Murray have to do with LeBron? Was Bron tasked with guarding Murray? Do they play the same position? Did LeBron guard Murray? Was LeBron responsible for acquiring guards who couldn't defend Murray for shyt?

You don't care about jack shyt that actually happens on the basketball court, you care SOLELY about narratives.


* You don't blame D-Lo for averaging 6ppg on 32% shooting and going 2-15 from 3pt for the series

* You don't blame Dennis for averaging 7ppg on 37% shooting

* You don't blame all the Laker guards for getting shredded by Murray regularly

* You don't blame Vanderbilt and Beasley for being unplayable in the series

* You don't blame AD for being incapable of guarding Jokic one-on-one without getting manhandled


Instead, you blame the guy who averaged 28-10-10 for 52% shooting in the series and played pretty good defense on a bad foot, SOLELY because he missed a few threes the first two games and a player he doesn't even guard went off. You're clueless.

You won't find a single other time in NBA history where a player who averaged anywhere even close to those numbers (nearly 30-10-10 on over 50% shooting) was blamed for losing the series.






This is a lie. He missed his shots in the first two games (0-10 combined) and was good in the next two games (3-9 and 4-7). You trying to shoehorn Game 3 in along with the first two games is more of the disingenuous bullshyt you always do.







Yeah, when fukking Ham decides to play an injured 38yo LeBron for 48 minutes straight and ride him all game long to the tune of 40-10-9, what the fukk do you think is going to happen in the final minute?


NO ONE IN the LEAGUE is being played for 48 minutes straight anymore, especially not anyone who is supposed to carry the load that LeBron carries. AD only played 40 minutes in that game. Murray played 43. Gordon, who was guarding LeBron on the play and is 11 years younger than him, played just 40. Even Jokic, who is over a decade younger than Bron and hardly ever had to run or jump due to the nature of his game, still got an extended break in the 2nd quarter. Playing LeBron for 48 minutes straight resulted in the exact predictable outcome.

Why would I group game 3 with game 4 instead of games 1 and 2 when no team has ever come back from 3-0? Do you even read what you type? You grouped the shytty game with the other shytty games instead of the good one. Uhh no shyt? He had a shytty shooting game following the last 2 shytty shooting games which in turn helped us go down 3-0 and effectively ended the series according to 50 years of data. Buddy was shooting airballs and passing hot potatoes to Rui and Schroeder because he was tired after dribbling for 22 seconds of the clock. Y’all the same ones finding nothing wrong with dude playing in the all star game and then sitting out games that matter.

You: YEAR 21!!!!!!


Also you: guys, it’s year 21. He’s tired
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,740
Reppin
the ether
Stop moving the goalposts . Lebron did not match or exceed Jamal Murray's production which is unacceptable.


This is the stupidest line. LeBron has nothing to do with Murray's production. You think that LeBron goes out saying:

"Well, averaging 28-10-10 is pretty good, seemed like that was the best I can do, but this other player is averaging 32-6-5 so I think I'll magically create 5 more ppg out of nowhere. At first I thought passing when double-teamed was the right move and 10 assists/game was pretty good, but if Jamal Murray is averaging a lot of points then shooting more must be the smart move."


What if Jamal Murray had averaged 10ppg less, and KCP/Gordon each averaged 10ppg more. Then LeBron would have exceeded Jamal Murray's production and you'd have nothing to complain about, yet they'd still have lost and the player Bron was ACTUALLY GUARDING would have scored more. That's how stupid your logic is, it somehow suggests that Bron would be better off letting his own defensive responsibility score.
 

GreatestLaker

#FirePelinka
Bushed
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
22,161
Reputation
980
Daps
44,225
Because you're not bright enough to do anything other than Monday Morning Quarterback. Everyone sees that in every game thread, where you say stupid shyt every fukking day that gets proved wrong. "AD is completely useless!" then AD finishes with 30 and 15 while leading the team to a win. "It's another fake comeback" then the Lakers make another great comeback and win. "This was a scheduled loss from the beginning, we can't beat them", then the Lakers win the game. You make it obvious that you know nothing about what is happening while it is happening, then you judge it all after the fact based solely on the dumb Canadian biases you have.


All of Kupchak's moves for Ariza, Pau, Artest, CP3, Dwight, Nash were seen as great moves at the time, they were almost UNIVERSALLY praised. The Ariza, Pau and Artest moves helped them win two titles, the Dwight and Nash moves didn't work out but not because he didn't put enough talent on the team. And losing out on CP3 had NOTHING to do with Kupchak, he can only negotiate a monster deal, he had no way of knowing that the league would veto it for being too good a deal. A general manager can only control who he acquires, he can't control what others do after the fact.

Lakers were the preseason favorites in 6-7 of the 16 years that Kupchak was GM. How the fukk is that possible for the "worst GM in the league"? That was Kupchak's job, and he did it. After that it's the responsibility of the players to perform, and they only won 4 of those seasons. That's not on him.

Steve Nash to Los Angeles Lakers: Grading the Trade for Both Sides

Lakers Grade: A
This trade was a brilliant move by Kupchak. Not only does he put a sharpshooter who can distribute the rock—Nash—with a guard who is an elite all-around scorer—Kobe Bryant—but he was also able to do it without jeopardizing his team's title hopes.


Dwight Howard Trade Analysis: Winners and Losers of 4-Team Blockbuster

Winner: Los Angeles Lakers​

Essentially, the Lakers just traded a first-round pick (at earliest in 2017, due to the Steve Nash trade) and Bynum for Howard.
Who in their right mind wouldn't do that deal?

The fact L.A. managed to spare Gasol from being involved in the trade makes them the clear, unquestioned winner here.



Dwight Howard to LA Lakers: Trade Analysis, Grade and Twitter Reaction


Grades
Lakers: A

The Los Angeles Lakers are now the team to beat in the NBA. Nash, Kobe, Metta World Peace, Gasol and Howard make up perhaps the best starting unit in the league—although their bench depth leaves something to be desired.

Regardless, GM Mitch Kupchak had no choice but to pull the trigger on this trade, as his squad had been eliminated early in the playoffs in the past two seasons and desperately needed a shakeup.

After acquiring Nash earlier in the offseason, the Lakers completed their transformation back to the top of the league by netting DH12.



Gasol trade earns Lakers top grade

It has been well documented that the Lakers obtained Pau Gasol through thievery. Not only did they get the former All-Star, but in the process, they got rid of Kwame Brown.

Brown actually had a desirable “expiring contract,” as well as an undesirable expiring career. The Lakers’ trade turned out to be so spectacularly one-sided that newbie Grizzlies general manager Chris Wallace was gun shy with trading Mike Miller, a player unnecessary for a rebuilding team, because of potential criticism that he might get in any deal with him.




Do you seriously think the majority opinion at the time was that Ariza, Pau, Artest, CP3, Dwight, and Nash were all mistakes when they were announced? You trying to talk shyt about acquiring Dwight, who had been 1st-team All-NBA for four straight years, Nash, who had been an All-Star the year before, or Artest, who had taken the Lakers to 7 in the WCSF just a couple months before he signed, is nonsense.
Here is the thing. At the time NBA stars used to demand to go to the Lakers directly or they would have LA on the short list of teams that they wanted to go to. Similar to how AD demanded a trade to LA. So who was Kupchak really competing against when he got Dwight and Pau?

Dwight was coming off back surgery and it was known that he wasn't ever going to be the same. Bynum was an elite player with a degenerative knee that no one knew about.

Dwight made it known during the regular season that he wasn't coming back. Any gm worth a damn would have moved him.

Same shyt happened with Pau the following year.

That roster was old and washed.

The Nash trade was horrible 4 picks for a 38 year old player.

Look at that roster and say with a straight face that it was any good.

Ariza move wasn't seen as anything. Ariza was relatively unknown at the time and that move was made to move salary if I'm remembering correctly. No one knew Trevor would have played as great as did in 09. Trevor credited Kobe for helping him fix his jump shot.

Replacing Artest for Ariza was a bad move. Artest performed nowhere as well as Ariza did for us.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,740
Reppin
the ether
Why would I group game 3 with game 4 instead of games 1 and 2 when no team has ever come back from 3-0? Do you even read what you type? You grouped the shytty game with the other shytty games instead of the good one. Uhh no shyt?

3-9 isn't a "shytty shooting game". 3-9 is the normal, expected result for any player who averages 30-38% from 3pt. 4-9 (44.4%) is a fantastic shooting game, while 3-9 is perfectly average.

What, was he supposed to shoot 3.5 for 9 in that game? :mjlol:

Your takes only work on people who can't think for shyt.
 

CantStop

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,161
Reputation
8,820
Daps
203,735
Here is the thing. At the time NBA stars used to demand to go to the Lakers directly or they would have LA on the short list of teams that they wanted to go to. Similar to how AD demanded a trade to LA. So who was Kupchak really competing against when he got Dwight and Pau?

Dwight was coming off back surgery and it was known that he wasn't ever going to be the same. Bynum was an elite player with a degenerative knee that no one knew about.

Dwight made it known during the regular season that he wasn't coming back. Any gm worth a damn would have moved him.

Same shyt happened with Pau the following year.

That roster was old and washed.

The Nash trade was horrible 4 picks for a 38 year old player.

Look at that roster and say with a straight face that it was any good.

Ariza move wasn't seen as anything. Ariza was relatively unknown at the time and that move was made to move salary if I'm remembering correctly. No one knew Trevor would have played as great as did in 09. Trevor credited Kobe for helping him fix his jump shot.

Replacing Artest for Ariza was a bad move. Artest performed nowhere as well as Ariza did for us.

Dude is so disingenuous. When we traded for Ariza, no one had any expectations for Ariza himself. We were just happy to see that bum Brian Cook go. In fact, it’s fitting he didn’t choose to do his research on that specific deal because the first thing that pops up is this:

The deal saves the Lakers some money in the end. While he's averaging only 3.3 points and 2.2 rebounds this season, Ariza is in the final year of his contract. Cook, averaging 2.3 points and 1.7 rebounds, is in the first year of a three-year, $10.5 million deal.



Just like when Kupchak admitted he didn’t even contact the Grizzlies about Pau, Memphis did and he said verbatim I wouldn’t have done the trade if Bynum got hurt. On my soul, I remember he said that because I used that talking point for years for anyone saying how great of a GM he was.
 

CantStop

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,161
Reputation
8,820
Daps
203,735
3-9 isn't a "shytty shooting game". 3-9 is the normal, expected result for any player who averages 30-38% from 3pt. 4-9 (44.4%) is a fantastic shooting game, while 3-9 is perfectly average.

What, was he supposed to shoot 3.5 for 9 in that game? :mjlol:

Your takes only work on people who can't think for shyt.

So 33% is a good shooting game? If a player averages 33% from the season, it would be considered a good year or average year? League average for his position is 37% buddy. Do you even know what you’re typing? You just argued that if he made one more, he’d have a better %. I’m crying lmao. Like he missed 6 shots out of 9 and you’re telling me that’s not a shytty shooting game.
 

Voice of Reason

Veteran
Joined
Jan 7, 2016
Messages
43,249
Reputation
262
Daps
122,558
Game 2 : LA Lakers led 31:45.0Denver led 12:37.0

Game 4 ; Denver led 14:59.0. LA Lakers led29:24.0


The lakers should have won games 2 and 4 despite Lebron being hurt and shooting badly.


The only reason they got swept is because of Darvin Ham.

They would have probably loss the series still but it should have never been a sweep.


they led both games 2 and 4 at a 2 to 1 ratio.
 
Top