JahFocus CS
Get It How You Get It
I do refuse to believe it, because it simply isn't true. Why would I willingly accept something that is false when you look at history?
actually no, he doesn't say that. but let's say he had articulated that
His point was very simple. "Intellectuals" don't like capitalism because they believe it rewards people's greed and promotes self-interest, which they believe to be a negative learned trait. They believe man isn't naturally greedy and social/economic factors make him so. Ergo, removing these social/economic factors will allow him to realize his true altruistic state. They want less capitalism, not more.
You advocate for communism?Social democracy and Stalinism have really muddled what communism means
You advocate for communism?
Or are you just pointing that out?
sacrifices in war refute that ideaCultural Marxist refuse to believe man is inherently self-interested
I don't know what that meansopps press enter mistake hold up.
Yeah exactly, this is what John Mackey was doing. Separating the theory from the implementation. Just as he said crony capitalism isn't pure capitalism, you're saying Stalinist/Maoist communist isn't pure communism. It's disingenuous to claim your right to adapt to historical occurrences that harm your position while denying someone else's.When were laborers in control of the means of production in the USSR or Maoist China? Bureaucrats aren't workers. State social capitalism is still capitalism.
The communism I'm sympathetic to isn't about selflessness. It's about justice. Whens the last time that whole foods owner picked an orange or stacked a shelf? When's the last time he swept the floors or drove the trucks? If he isn't doing all the work why is he entitled to use profits as he sees fit?
He mentions that their payroll is 7-8 times larger than their profits. Anybody think a 12.5% universal bonus is peanuts?
Side note-Fascism and communism are not comparable morally. Fascism is at its core a racist and warmongering ideology that would inevitably lead to genocide or the next thing to it. Communism can and has been hijacked into tolitarianism, but there is little equivalency between an ideology that stresses equality, justice, and peace and one advocating supremacy, nationalism, and domination.
Yeah I was just riffing on some bs arguments i've had, there are many left wing/communist thinkers who posit worthwhile and engaging critiques. I just haven't personally met many of themtoo many ad hominems to argue against
Self interest has proven to be a better allocator of scarce resources than self sacrifice.Right-wingers lament sacrifice, focusing on the greater good, etc., until it comes to the military or police Then it is amazing, noble, and encouraged
Yeah exactly, this is what John Mackey was doing. Separating the theory from the implementation. Just as he said crony capitalism isn't pure capitalism, you're saying Stalinist/Maoist communist isn't pure communism. It's disingenuous to claim your right to adapt to historical occurrences that harm your position while denying someone else's.
As for your other points, John Mackey isn't being paid to pick oranges or stack shelves. He has his role and the other workers at the company have theirs. Specialization has been a sine qua non of the greatest period of prosperity the world has ever known. If your problem is that he is being compensated at a rate incommensurate to the value he provides, I would ask how you're determining value. Because the skill set needed for an individual truck driver or floor sweeper doesn't seem to be equal to whatever skills Mackey employs at CEO of the 4 billion dollar company overseeing 58,000 truck drivers and floor sweepers. Those people are easily replaceable because they have a low skillset.
Also, I agree that "pure" Communism's ideology isn't inherently genocidal or racist, the point is that it almost always inevitably becomes so. We have to look at why this ideology is so susceptible to being hijacked, and my hypothesis is that it's because it doesn't acknowledge basic factors that are imbedded in human psychology. Communism is something that is wonderful on an individual scale but completely disintegrates on a national scale because it fails to incorporate the whole range of human behaviours and psyches. It's telling that it's usually the leaders of these communist regimes that display the behaviours and beliefs that end up counteracting its ideology.
The notion of human perfectibility is essential to communism. Without the idea that humans are consistently capable of putting aside their self-interest for the betterment of the collective, communism falls apart, which is what history has shown us.actually no, he doesn't say that. but let's say he had articulated that
no intellectual hates capitalism because it does not let man realize his altruistic state and if they did the are irrelevant arguments to me, besides being petty.
the intellectuals I follow from Chomsky to Zinn have issues with runaway capitalism because of the suffering it causes and they desire more restraints on capitalism.
The general idea that any restraint is anti-free market is bullshyt
You can have laws that create fair play for everyone in the market and laws that prevent fair play in the market.
Uh, I didn't say perception didn't exist. Jesus Christ.sacrifices in war refute that idea
a father risking life and limb to save his child refute that idea
women and children first to the life boats refute that idea
I was doing something irl, and hit the enter keyboard before I finished my post. I've update my last post since then.I don't know what that means