Last edited by a moderator:
Iverson's 6 best seasons:
98-99 = 28.6 ppg 41% from the field on 22 shot attempts,
4.6 assist, 4.9 rebounds, 2.3 steals, 3.5 turnovers
99-00 = 28.4 ppg 42% from the field on 24.8 shot attempts,
4.7 assist, 3.8 rebounds, 2.1 steals, 3.3 turnovers
00-01 = 31.1 ppg 42% from the field on 25.5 shot attempts,
4.6 assist, 3.8 rebounds, 2.5 steals, 3.3. turnovers
01-02 = 31.4 ppg 39% from the field on 27.8 shot attempts,
5.5. assist, 4.5 rebounds. 2.8 steals, 4 turnovers per game
04-05 = 30.7 ppg on 42% from the field on 24.2 shot attempts,
7.9 assist, 4.0 rebounds, 2.4 steals, 4.6 turnovers
05-06 = 33.0 ppg on 44.7% from the field on 25.3 shot attempts,
7.4 assist, 3.2 rebounds, 1.9 steals, 3.4 turnovers
Clyde the Glyde:
86-86 = 21.7 ppg on 50.1% from the field on 17.2 shot attempts,
6.9 assist, 6.3 rebounds, 2.5 steals, 3.1 turnovers
87-88 = 27.0 ppg on 50.6% from the field on 20.7 shot attempts,
5.8 assist, 6.6 rebounds 2.5 steals, 2.9 turnovers
88-89 = 27.2 ppg on 49.6% from the field on 21.4 shot attempts,
5.8 assist, 7.9 rebounds, 2.7 steals, 3.2 turnovers
89-90 = 23.3 ppg on 49.4% from the field on 18.6 shot attempts,
5.9 assist, 6.9 rebounds, 2.0 steals, 2.6 turnovers
90-91 = 21.5 ppg on on 48.2 from the field on 16.3 shot attempts,
6.0 assist, 6.7 rebounds, 1.8 steals, 2.8 turnovers
91-92 = 25.0 ppg 47.0% from the field on 19.4 shot attempts,
6.7 assist, 6.6 rebounds, 1.8 steals, 3.2 turnovers
I don't know how anyone can look at these numbers and not conclude that:
Clyde was clearly, the better, more efficient, all-round basketball player. He was able to share the ball with other talented players. It kills me when Iverson-apologist argue that he never had any other scorers to play with, when the fact was he never wanted to play with another scorer and the Philly front office knew that, so they complimented him with defensive-minded, role-players who didn't care that they shot the ball 4.2 times per game. It's the NBA not fukin Rucker Park...Iverson's claim to fame is one fluke win against L.A. in the Finals.
Because some of us WATCH the games and don't just READ the statlines.
Danny ainge, duckworth, cliff robinson, Terry porter, robert pack, Jerome kersey.
Better than any help Iverson ever had
The fact that Danny Ainge is the first somebody you thought of and listed says a lot.
- Kevin Duckworth was a flash in the pan.
- Cliff Robinson was good, but he was ahead of his time being a 6'10 nicca who played the 3. He was mostly a size disadvantage for the other team.
- Terry Porter was probably the biggest threat they had after Clyde, but he's what many people on this board try to villify Reggie Miller as.
- When did Clyde play with Robert Pack? I don't remember that.
- Jerome Kersey? Please.
- You didn't mention Buck Williams, who was good - but if he was a Blazer in his prime, they might've gotten a ring one of those times they got to the finals.
If you compare these dudes to what AI had to play with, you're only missing a Porter/Ainge dude. If AI had that, it may not have mattered because he probably would pass to them anyway. lol
you're selling those blazers teams short.
they were probably the most talented team in the league, but they were the ultimate choking dogs, and wasn't an alpha type.
I was just listing team mates. No particular order.The fact that Danny Ainge is the first somebody you thought of and listed says a lot.
- Kevin Duckworth was a flash in the pan.
- Cliff Robinson was good, but he was ahead of his time being a 6'10 nicca who played the 3. He was mostly a size disadvantage for the other team.
- Terry Porter was probably the biggest threat they had after Clyde, but he's what many people on this board try to villify Reggie Miller as.
- When did Clyde play with Robert Pack? I don't remember that.
- Jerome Kersey? Please.
- You didn't mention Buck Williams, who was good - but if he was a Blazer in his prime, they might've gotten a ring one of those times they got to the finals.
If you compare these dudes to what AI had to play with, you're only missing a Porter/Ainge dude. If AI had that, it may not have mattered because he probably would pass to them anyway. lol
The fact that Danny Ainge is the first somebody you thought of and listed says a lot.
- Kevin Duckworth was a flash in the pan.
- Cliff Robinson was good, but he was ahead of his time being a 6'10 nicca who played the 3. He was mostly a size disadvantage for the other team.
- Terry Porter was probably the biggest threat they had after Clyde, but he's what many people on this board try to villify Reggie Miller as.
- When did Clyde play with Robert Pack? I don't remember that.
- Jerome Kersey? Please.
- You didn't mention Buck Williams, who was good - but if he was a Blazer in his prime, they might've gotten a ring one of those times they got to the finals.
If you compare these dudes to what AI had to play with, you're only missing a Porter/Ainge dude. If AI had that, it may not have mattered because he probably would pass to them anyway. lol
I was just listing team mates. No particular order.
Pack was on the 92 team. And regardless of how you veiw those dudes, those were a better combo of players than Iverson every had the homor of playing with.
I was just listing team mates. No particular order.
Pack was on the 92 team. And regardless of how you veiw those dudes, those were a better combo of players than Iverson every had the homor of playing with.
Didn't iverson play with Melo, Mutumbo, Iggy. Those three combined have all star appearances than any of clydes teammates ever did and all of them were in their prime except mutumbo who was still a premier shot blocker. The only perennial all stars Clyde played with was hakeem and Barkley a few years before they retired.
Take him off the blazers and you basically a team full of role players.