WHITE Slaves and BLACK Masters....the untold history of North Africa

NoGutsNoGLory

Superstar
Joined
Dec 22, 2014
Messages
6,597
Reputation
515
Daps
27,334


This is one of the most hidden parts of history that nobody wants to talk about. From the year 1500-1800 there was a major slave trade that happened along the Mediterranean Sea. 1.25 million white slaves were taken from Europe to North Africa by a group of black men called the Moors. Most of the white slaves taken by the Moors were women. And they were taken primarily as sex slaves (aka concubines). This is historically referred to as the "Barbary Slave Trade". Barbary slave trade - Wikipedia

This is how the modern day population of North Africa became non-black. For references sake, only 388,000 slaves were taken from West Africa to the United States. And that population of 388,000 black people has grown to over 40 million people in 2017. If 388,000 black slaves from West Africa could change the face of North America. Imagine what 1.25 million white slaves from Europe did to the face of North Africa?

This is a part of history that crakkkas don't want to talk about. They don't wanna talk about it because they don't want to admit there was a time when blacks ruled Europe and were taking whites as slaves into Africa. And it was this mixing of black African slave masters and white European slaves that created the modern day look of the peoples of North Africa.

So it wasn't the millions of arabs that invaded from Saudi Arabia like 800 years before that? :francis:
 

NoGutsNoGLory

Superstar
Joined
Dec 22, 2014
Messages
6,597
Reputation
515
Daps
27,334
For references sake, only 388,000 slaves were taken from West Africa to the United States


Those numbers are SERIOUSLY deflated breh.....more them that got tossed in the ocean.....:camby:
Nah thats about right, the vast majority of slaves went to South America and the Carribean. Those places had better weather for growing crops.
 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,602
Reputation
-17,811
Daps
84,243
Reppin
NULL
Wrong Google north African genetics, you will know they don't have much European or Arab ancestry, most of them are Berbers.

Reference Populations - Geno 2.0 Next Generation

No. You're wrong.

2008, which analysed 614 individuals from 10 different regions (Morocco (Asni, Bouhria, Figuig, Souss), Algeria (Mozabites), Tunisia (Chenini-Douiret, Sened, Matmata, Jerba) and Egypt (Siwa)),[22] the results may be summarized as follows:

  • Total West Eurasian lineages (H, HV, R0, J,T, U (without U6), K, N1, N2, X) : 50-80 percent
  • Total sub-Saharan lineages (L0, L1, L2, L3,L4, L5) : 20-40 percent
  • Total North African lineages (U6, M1) : 10-30 percent
Genetic history of North Africa - Wikipedia

So you see. The Berber MtDNA is a mixed bag of Western European and African ancestry. I never said the female side was purely European. But there is a definite sizeable European ancestry on the female side. While the male side is almost entirely African.

You need to learn that some of these DNA testing sites are agenda driven. These cacs are desperate to hide the reality of their genetic ancestry. They have been defining the mulatto ancestry of North Africans as native to the region because if they don't do that, they have to admit they are also mixed.

This is the major problem with genetic testing. It matters what you define as native to a region and what you say came in through outside gene flow. For example cacs have been desperately trying to deny that the Y-DNA haplogroup E1b1b originated and is native to Sub-Saharan Africa. They have been desperately trying to define it as native to Arabia or North Africa. As far away as they can from "Black Africa" even though the male Y-DNA haplogroup E is the largest in Africa and is shared by everyone in the continent from East to West to North to South.

They do this because there is a lot of E1b1b Y-DNA ancestry in Europe primarily in Southern Europe with Italians, Greeks, and Spanish. You won't see this DNA marker defined as Sub-Saharan African because they don't want to admit they are part black. So they try to define it as Berber or North African or anything but "Black African" so they don't have to be part black in ancestry.

They don't want to be told that the Moors fukked so many women in Southern Europe that they turned them from being blonde hair and blue eyed like their northern neighbors into dark haired brown eyed mulattoes.
 

#1 pick

The Smart Negroes
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
76,078
Reputation
11,156
Daps
195,804
Reppin
Lamb of God
maxresdefault.jpg
 

Bawon Samedi

Good bye Coli
Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
42,413
Reputation
18,635
Daps
166,481
Reppin
Good bye Coli(2014-2020)
Its commonly known that black Berbers even until the 19th century were raiding coastal Europe for slaves. Its a myth that Africans throughout history were the bulk of the victims of slavery. Throughout much of history and especially the Middle Ages most of the slaves were Slavic Europeans. Africans were only recently victims of the slave trade.


Anyways Rif Pirates who were doing the slave trading.
riffan-pirates.jpg
 

Bawon Samedi

Good bye Coli
Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
42,413
Reputation
18,635
Daps
166,481
Reppin
Good bye Coli(2014-2020)
Anyways like I said before and always said. MIXING was NOT the reason for the demographic change in Northwest Africa. It was indigenous Berbers(who we would call 'black') being pushed/absorbed by European/Arab settlers in an already sparsely populated area. We all forget that Muslims(including whites/Arabs) being expelled from Iberia and settling Northwest Africa. Algeria especially was sparsely populated during that time.
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
49,973
Reputation
4,843
Daps
112,521
Reppin
In the Silver Lining


This is one of the most hidden parts of history that nobody wants to talk about. From the year 1500-1800 there was a major slave trade that happened along the Mediterranean Sea. 1.25 million white slaves were taken from Europe to North Africa by a group of black men called the Moors. Most of the white slaves taken by the Moors were women. And they were taken primarily as sex slaves (aka concubines). This is historically referred to as the "Barbary Slave Trade". Barbary slave trade - Wikipedia

This is how the modern day population of North Africa became non-black. For references sake, only 388,000 slaves were taken from West Africa to the United States. And that population of 388,000 black people has grown to over 40 million people in 2017. If 388,000 black slaves from West Africa could change the face of North America. Imagine what 1.25 million white slaves from Europe did to the face of North Africa?

This is a part of history that crakkkas don't want to talk about. They don't wanna talk about it because they don't want to admit there was a time when blacks ruled Europe and were taking whites as slaves into Africa. And it was this mixing of black African slave masters and white European slaves that created the modern day look of the peoples of North Africa.


:jbmm: Kinda deep........makes North Africa look funny in the light :mjlol:. So Moors had a heavy Buck streak for a few years and created North Africa....???? ???? :mindblown:.....can't even make this up.....Moor Us By Us :dead:....
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,602
Reputation
-17,811
Daps
84,243
Reppin
NULL
Its commonly known that black Berbers even until the 19th century were raiding coastal Europe for slaves. Its a myth that Africans throughout history were the bulk of the victims of slavery. Throughout much of history and especially the Middle Ages most of the slaves were Slavic Europeans. Africans were only recently victims of the slave trade.


Anyways Rif Pirates who were doing the slave trading.
riffan-pirates.jpg

This is true. American Navy even went to war with the black berbers to have them stop raiding their ships and other European ships in the Mediterranean. I believe this was during the time of Jefferson.
 

NoGutsNoGLory

Superstar
Joined
Dec 22, 2014
Messages
6,597
Reputation
515
Daps
27,334
Its commonly known that black Berbers even until the 19th century were raiding coastal Europe for slaves. Its a myth that Africans throughout history were the bulk of the victims of slavery. Throughout much of history and especially the Middle Ages most of the slaves were Slavic Europeans. Africans were only recently victims of the slave trade.


Anyways Rif Pirates who were doing the slave trading.
riffan-pirates.jpg
I do t mean to go off on u breh but this is for future referemce but that is such a stupid concept wwhere i have no idea where it came from. They are called slavs as a linguistic group, they were never slaves.
 
Top