honesty vs chicanery....
White Liberalism
- Thread starter the next guy
- Start date
-
- Tags
- black exploitation
mc_brew
#NotMyPresident
so you're alright with exploitation as long as it's honest...honesty vs chicanery....
I'm no fan of republicans, but at least they are outwardly honest with their dislike of blacks. liberals have been much more effective in using blacks
they come in the form of friendship, but have dismantled our family structure with their welfare policies, and they've helped severely cull our population by bringing in abortion to our communities. Now that the negroes are 'locked in', what is the democratic party doing for blacks other than using them as a footstool to get their agenda completed before tossing them aside?
Well for starters, its never been confirmed that he actually said those quotes, but him passing civil rights legislation is confirmed. Besides, a white man from the south, born in the early 20th century, using the Nword wouldnt exactly have been breaking news in the 1960s
But you gotta love how you accuse others of racially damaging perspectives, when you yourself communicate insulting ideas about blacks in the very next paragraph. Your theory is that black people are so slovenly and unambitious as a constitution of our being, that we purposely forgo supposedly accessible enterprising mainstream opportunities, in favor of a welfare and free money. Supposedly that was the plot all along behind great society initiatives, and the "white liberal" knew they could capitalize on it. No other influences or variables explain welfare rates, just stupid blacks, and the liberal plan. Of course you play like you dont like conservative politics, but you seem awfully invested in deflecting and letting it off the hook.
alright with exploitation? no, but faced with it, I do prefer honestyso you're alright with exploitation as long as it's honest...
mc_brew
#NotMyPresident
i can't support exploitation in any form, honest or dishonest... my people have been through too much...alright with exploitation? no, but faced with it, I do prefer honesty
Letting conservative politics off the hook? I was an extremely vocal critic of Bush, but guess which party is now doing essentially the SAME things? I still see the same handouts going to corporations, I still see the same corporate driven wars being waged as when Bush was in office, or are we going to act like the war in Libya wasn't illegal?
I don't tether myself to political parties. They are there to gather votes and if you sell your vote easily, they will toss you in the backburner, which has happened with blacks.
You're the one making up some nonsense about blacks being lazy. The fact of the matter is that there were stipulations in welfare that encouraged single parenthood households, such as welfare paying more when there is no father in the home. Blacks, at one point, had extremely high marriage rates and two parent households, but look at us now.
In regards to abortion, are we going to deny the racist origins of planned parenthood and margaret sanger's negro plan? And quite successful it has been, with millions of babies being aborted.
I don't tether myself to political parties. They are there to gather votes and if you sell your vote easily, they will toss you in the backburner, which has happened with blacks.
You're the one making up some nonsense about blacks being lazy. The fact of the matter is that there were stipulations in welfare that encouraged single parenthood households, such as welfare paying more when there is no father in the home. Blacks, at one point, had extremely high marriage rates and two parent households, but look at us now.
In regards to abortion, are we going to deny the racist origins of planned parenthood and margaret sanger's negro plan? And quite successful it has been, with millions of babies being aborted.
something hypocrite blacks usually use to justify voting republican by saying both parties are racist and therefore have equally shytty policies
Fixed
But I don't think those are programs a "liberal-minded white supremacist" would advocate blacks to have or be a part of.
Of course they would, it guarantees the black vote, and makes them dependant.But I don't think those are programs a "liberal-minded white supremacist" would advocate blacks to have or be a part of.
Study some of the ways whites conditioned slaves and made them dependant on their masters, and compare them to the programs in question.
twim is a smart dumb nicca. he's suggestions do more damage to the black community. he's worse than white supremacists.But I don't think those are programs a "liberal-minded white supremacist" would advocate blacks to have or be a part of.
negros need all the help they can get.
on a state level is corporate welfare "hurting" corporations?
is israel hurting cause they receive 3 billion+ in aid?
the final stage in exterminating the negro race seems to be getting rid of these social programs.
well final stage will really be just shooting them off.
Welfare needs to be ended for all IMHO the rich and the poor. But to answer you, it doesnt hurt the rich like it does the poor.
why do the rich even receive welfare?
if we're to say fuq the poor we must also be able to say fuq the rich..
http://www.propublica.org/special/government-bailouts
where's the bailout for the poor ppl?
now i know what you're gonna say.. say some shyt with 
and i agree
and i agree 
You really think the reason black people mostly vote Democrat is because they want welfare and public housing?
Kinda of a shame for an (ostensibly) fellow black person to have internalized stupid Republican talking points.
dead7 isn't black.You really think the reason black people mostly vote Democrat is because they want welfare and public housing?
Kinda of a shame for an (ostensibly) fellow black person to have internalized stupid Republican talking points.