White house releases statement about parkinsons expert visiting white house 8 times in 8 months

[Geek Nasty]

After the debate I was honestly shocked how hard the liberal media went after him, they were tougher than me

Because a lot of people in the press were either lied to or knew and want to save face.

No excuse not to lnow though. Im sitting at home in Kansas and its obvious from here

 

[UpNext]

This is all really wild because Biden looks so bad regardless of whether it's true or not people will believe it. You can't trust the government and you can't trust the media, but with your own eyes you see that there is no way on Earth this man is anywhere near the most qualified to run this country and you see how expensive things have gotten and how much harder the job market is and just run with it.


If he were doing anything near a competent job folks would just scoff this off but nah, he's only been not Trump level bad so folks want to pretend he shouldn't be stepping down.

 

[3rdLetter]

The New York Times and Biden (and his team) have been beefing for a few years now. They are still mad that he snubbed them of an interview a couple years ago so they've been going hard at him. Both liberal and non-Trump conservative pundits on podcasts discussed the NYT's un-necessary saltiness toward Biden.

Small parts of a larger article on the drama between the Biden team and the NYT.

Biden’s closest aides had come to see the Times as arrogant, intent on setting its own rules and unwilling to give Biden his due. Inside the paper’s D.C. bureau, the punitive response seemed to typify a press operation that was overly sensitive and determined to control coverage of the president.

According to interviews with two dozen people on both sides who were granted anonymity to discuss a sensitive subject, the relationship between the Democratic president and the country’s newspaper of record — for years the epitome of a liberal press in the eyes of conservatives — remains remarkably tense, beset by misunderstandings, grudges and a general lack of trust. Complaints that were long kept private are even spilling into public view, with campaign aides in Wilmington going further than their colleagues in the White House and routinely blasting the paper’s coverage in emails, posts on social media and memos.

Although the president’s communications teams bristle at coverage from dozens of outlets, the frustration, and obsession, with the Times is unique, reflecting the resentment of a president with a working-class sense of himself and his team toward a news organization catering to an elite audience — and a deep desire for its affirmation of their work. On the other side, the newspaper carries its own singular obsession with the president, aggrieved over his refusal to give the paper a sit-down interview that Publisher AG Sulzberger and other top editors believe to be its birthright.

The president’s press flacks might bemoan what they see as the entitlement of Times staffers, but they themselves put the newspaper on the highest of pedestals given its history, stature and unparalleled reach. And yet, they see the Times falling short in a make-or-break moment for American democracy, stubbornly refusing to adjust its coverage as it strives for the appearance of impartial neutrality, often blurring the asymmetries between former President Donald Trump and Biden when it comes to their perceived flaws and vastly different commitments to democratic principles.

---

Having been in politics for some 50 years, Biden has long dealt with reporters and editors from the Times, and, for the most part, cordially. But frustrations began to mount early in 2019 as Biden launched his third run for the White House in a crowded Democratic primary field. Times reporters were annoyed not to have been invited to Biden’s first public appearance after announcing his candidacy, an informal stop at a Wilmington pizzeria that two other reporters were tipped off about. But aides to Biden, who tended to trust his generational contemporaries at the Times — columnists and other journalists he’d gotten comfortable with over several years — said they didn’t know anyone on the politics team well. “Unlike some outlets, the Times just never invested in a reporter who really knew and understood Biden and his appeal,” said one former campaign staffer. “And the coverage reflected that.”

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/04/25/new-york-times-biden-white-house-00154219

So the NYT has been to Biden like what Cornell West was to Obama. Got snubbed once for something and been acting like a hoe ever since

 

[CouldntBeMeTho]

I will take the word of medical doctor with decades of experience, than people just speculating because of their agendas

In 10 years when it comes out he was hiding dementia or parkinsons I hope u kill yourself.

 

[King Poetic]

I love how msnbc literally showed a neurologist showed up 20 times during Obama time in office

They the only network left, thats actually breaking down facts

 

[CouldntBeMeTho]

Because a lot of people in the press were either lied to or knew and want to save face.

No excuse not to lnow though. Im sitting at home in Kansas and its obvious from here

Did you watch that video from the neurologist? He said he could diagnose biden from across the mall

 

[Roger king]

In 10 years when it comes out he was hiding dementia or parkinsons I hope u kill yourself.

Why resort to such ad hominems. The medical doctor , the neurologist, says biden has no neurological issue, yet you dispute it, where are the facts on your side? The onus is on you to then sort out information to challenge that

 

[CouldntBeMeTho]

I love how msnbc literally showed a neurologist showed up 20 times during Obama time in office

They the only network left, thats actually breaking down facts

The only network left that tells you what you want to hear

 

[CouldntBeMeTho]

Why resort to such ad hominems. The medical doctor , the neurologist, says biden has no neurological issue, yet you dispute it, where are the facts on your side? The onus is on you to then sort out information to challenge that

They can't disclose his condition because hipaa. And there's a neurologist in the first couple posts insisting he does.

Go listen to him speak In 2020. Compare that to now. Then look in the mirror and put clown paint on your face

 

[Still Benefited]

All they had to do was prop up Michelle and she would be the first woman President with a lot of clout from her former husbands successful administration

It would look bad,but they really shouldve kicked Kamala to the curb for Michelle. Its not fair since Biden is the problem. But if she is useless in standing in and galvonizing the party and voters.

Michelle might have taken the vice president role. You can always step down from that and nobody will care(hint hint Kamala)


They better come up with a way she can bow out and save face. Maybe her husband is facing a rare form of skin cancer

 

[Geek Nasty]

Did you watch that video from the neurologist? He said he could diagnose biden from across the mall

Yeah that cracked me up, like damn not even a doubt

 

[LeVraiPapi]

@CouldntBeMeTho is a MAGA CAC who was posting quotes from Truth Social and defended the January 6 attack on the Capitol.

It’s sad to see @Gloxina being a gleeful useful idiot and countless other posters I respect doing the same as well being bamboo led and played by a racist cac.

Since OP has me on ignore after exposing him and donning him multiple times, why don’t y’all ask him bout Trump and his mental fitness ? How about asking him about Project 2025 ? Watch how he scrambles

 

[Gloxina]

@CouldntBeMeTho is a MAGA CAC who was posting quotes from Truth Social and defended the January 6 attack on the Capitol.

It’s sad to see @Gloxina being a gleeful useful idiot and countless other posters I respect doing the same as well being bamboo led and played by a racist cac.

Since OP has me on ignore after exposing him and donning him multiple times, why don’t y’all ask him bout Trump and his mental fitness ? How about asking him about Project 2025 ? Watch how he scrambles

Hol up why my name in it?

Because I, along with a plethora of ppl in the media, noted that yea….something is off with Biden?


I literally said IDGAF and it’s Biden 2024.

 

[LeVraiPapi]

Hol up why my name in it?

Because I, along with a plethora of ppl in the media, noted that yea….something is off with Biden?


I literally said IDGAF and it’s Biden 2024.

Because you’re here pushing the lie OP is pushing about a Parkinson’s specialist. Lmao. Been medical for almost 2 decades and I never heard of such a term. Never.

 

[Gloxina]

Because you’re here pushing the lie OP is pushing about a Parkinson’s specialist. Lmao. Been medical for almost 2 decades and I never heard of such a term. Never.

….??

I mean I think it would be clear they are referring to a neurologist who specializes in Parkinson’s or other movement disorders. Are you serious?


There are doctors who specialize in all sorts of various disorders and diseases. Like, what are you talking about?

Dystonia is another movement disorders that can be diagnosed and treated by a “dystonia specialist” i.e. a fukking neurologist who specializes in Dystonia.

Have you heard of a “glaucoma specialist”? That is an ophthalmologist who specializes in glaucoma. Because there are other eye disorders besides glaucoma that are studied and treated.

A retina specialist, for example, is another ophthalmologist who specializes in studying/treating the retina.


There are various specialties:

-internal medicine
-pediatrics
-podiatry
-ophthalmology
-dermatology
-orthopedics
-gynecology
Etc

I mean the list goes on because there is literally a doctor for EVERYTHING

Beyond that those doctors can choose to specialize in specific treatments, disorders, etc.

So your GP sends you to a specialist when they detect that something is wrong or needs special focus and they know it is outside of their scope.

I’m sorry- you’ve “been medical for almost two decades”? I’m not one to ask personal questions on here because, again, this is a fukking forum and anyone can lie, but now I must ask: What exactly does that mean? What do you do?


If you’ve been in medical settings for two decades you MUST have encountered doctors who specialize in certain things.
And even if you don’t work with them, you know that patients are referred out to specialists all the time.



In closing, referring to a doctor as a Parkinson’s specialist is just shorthand for “a neurologist who specializes in diagnosing and treating Parkinson’s Disease”.

Two words vs ten.














Aight. That’s my sign to get back to work.