FromBillionsCameOne
All Star
Stupid posed question. Is the one on one in a fair fight? A melee with a bunch of people? Are the opponents around th same size?
Which Fighting Discipline Would The Most Useful In A Real Fight: Wrestling, Ju-Jitsu or Boxing?
- Thread starter bogey_j
- Start date
Columbo
Lieutenant
Floyd > Bruce Lee
I work the clubs out here in dade n i dare one of u nikkas to come here tryna grapple on the floor n shyt lol all u gonna do is eat is jordans n timb boots papo, boxing is where is at. I seen a cat drop 3 dus n ran off before cops got there a grappler wouldve got stomped n possibly caught by the boys cuz he still wouldve been tossin turnin on the floor
Boxing, easy. All starts fight standing up.
It takes a fraction of a second to enter a boxing stance. Quickest safest and easiest way to neutralize a threat no matter where you are.
Wrestling Bjj are great tools, but they dont protect you from the unpredictability of a street fight. Most of em take place where theres alcohol i.e a club, lounge or a bar. That means theres chairs, tables, people, everywhere. You can only be so effective on the ground. And even if you do get on the ground, now youre vulnerable when his crew jumps in and stomps you the fxck out. Or worse, when your opponent slips out a weapon and carves you up (ive seen it happen). Also you have to worry about getting your opponent to the ground in the first place. You dont have to be a trained professional to avoid a takedown... You simply just need good balance and reflexes. And if your opponent has those then youre in for a struggle.
Balance and reflexes wont save you from a trained boxer/kickboxer. One combo and the fight is over.
It takes a fraction of a second to enter a boxing stance. Quickest safest and easiest way to neutralize a threat no matter where you are.
Wrestling Bjj are great tools, but they dont protect you from the unpredictability of a street fight. Most of em take place where theres alcohol i.e a club, lounge or a bar. That means theres chairs, tables, people, everywhere. You can only be so effective on the ground. And even if you do get on the ground, now youre vulnerable when his crew jumps in and stomps you the fxck out. Or worse, when your opponent slips out a weapon and carves you up (ive seen it happen). Also you have to worry about getting your opponent to the ground in the first place. You dont have to be a trained professional to avoid a takedown... You simply just need good balance and reflexes. And if your opponent has those then youre in for a struggle.
Balance and reflexes wont save you from a trained boxer/kickboxer. One combo and the fight is over.
Last edited:
TrebleMan
Superstar
Muay Thai or boxing and a weapon art/skill like Kali.
I got no interest fighting anybody out in public but something like Muay Thai or boxing does help if you need to drop someone quick and get away before their friends rush in. An elbow is devastating.
If it's life and death, fukk a fair one, weapons all day and I'll look for anything that looks like it could be used as one. If you're trained with a weapon, it'd be a serious mistake for somebody to engage.
Kali I know is one of the only skills that will train to think of everyday objects as weapons.
I got no interest fighting anybody out in public but something like Muay Thai or boxing does help if you need to drop someone quick and get away before their friends rush in. An elbow is devastating.
If it's life and death, fukk a fair one, weapons all day and I'll look for anything that looks like it could be used as one. If you're trained with a weapon, it'd be a serious mistake for somebody to engage.
Kali I know is one of the only skills that will train to think of everyday objects as weapons.
Last edited:
reservoirdogs
Superstar
I heard from some places that the problem w Muay Thai in a street situation is that while it makes you tough and teaches you how to use your hands, legs, elbows, knees even close quarters clinch fighting, it doesn't focuses all that much on footwork/movement and defense, they often rather tough is out.
I'd rather say Dutch kickboxing then where there's more movement and defense, resembling of western boxing and in offense largely builds on the leg kicks of Muay Thai and the hand techniques of boxing.
Agree on the weapon arts
what y'all think?
How many opponents? does the other guy know martial arts too? are weapons involved
lmao No MMA fighter, BJJ, or wrestler has EVER FOUGHT A PRIME WORLD CLASS BOXING ATHELTE EVER
WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT
even when Ali did that match with the Wrestler HE WAS NOT THE SAME ALI, after wasting the rest of his prime protesting the war he never had the same foot work, same speed or anything
you clearly do not understand combat
Sakuraba submited all he gracies, he is a JAPANESE WRESTLER NOT A BJJ OR JUDO GUY A fukkING CATCH WRESTLER, get folded Ray Mysterio Jr lmao
Like I said you can believe whatever you want. As long as you know you are wrong that's all that matters.
As long as you know the truth why A PRIME WORLD CLASS BOXING ATHELTE has never fought a BJJ EVER, that's all that matters.
BECAUSE THERE IS NO MONEY IN IT YOU DUMB ASS, washed up old boxers have won MMA and kickboxing matches against former champions in those sports THESE ARE FACTS
old ass ray mercer who isn't a technical boxer just a puncher beat Tim Slyvia who was 32 in an MMA match in a few seconds, this man went the distance with Couture and beat Andre Arloski multiple times
Francos Botha defeated Peter Aerts one of the kickboxing GOATS in a kickboxing match lmao, you can't be serious
bjj isn't fighting, its grappking, the first UFC was a glorfied tough man contest, set to market BJJ, I mean a gacier was part owner of the company lmao
since the company was brought and put back out a gracie has won one match in the UFC lmao
you don't understand range control, and or anything about boxing, to ever form a sensibe argument
I'm not here to convince you of anything. Believe what you want.
Just know that you are wrong.