Anyone who comes into a conversation saying, "I'm able to see things from an unbiased viewpoint" is exposing their ass from the start.
I mean, if you don't know that
LeBron is a better passer and rebounder than MJ, not really sure what the point is of the conversation.
MJ was a much better midrange shooter, LBJ is a better three-point shooter, they were both extremely effective at the rim. Overall MJ was a more aggressive scorer and at least in his own era was more effective.
Defense can obviously be debated, they both have their strengths. MJ was more consistently a bulldog man defender,
LBJ could defend more positions and was a better rim protector, they both were great in the passing lanes.
I don't think it's cut-and-dried either way.
Uh, you do know that Scottie said MJ cared so much about his stats that he would have a certain goal to reach each quarter, so that he would be sure to get his points up by the end of the game? He was literally thinking about his stats
the entire game.