One of the biggest reasons why I hate the Jordan LeBron debate, no one ever takes into account position played or system they played in. They both played completely different roles on there teams and was asked to do different things. The debate is dumb imo.
no,...
they did not.
LeBron shirked his natural at pg.
he is not a three and bron will always be susceptible to losing because he shirked his natural.
plus still employs parochial high school iq based bball to the big leagues.
the only reason he has won is thr NBA has taken on regressive professional play.
by institution of zone defense, no hand checking, no illegal defense, low iq perimeter based parochial luxury high end sports Facility based play.
instead of high quality iq based basketball
Which is easily schemed out by any past NBA highly pedigreed player and coach.
which is why he is three and six in the finals.
plus ruined two four peats.
plus ruined and traded away the highest pedigreed backcourt in NBA history.
that we can compare to a failed attempt to be the Dallas cowboys doubling doen by trading walker in the nineties. Yet it never materializing in the real number of potentia nba titles. Which also shows he is incapable of being a front office lead player style dynamo as well.
when in comparison mj was having to deal with an errant goof in an account. Then take bullshyt spreadsheet parts and make it all work as well.
without losing in thr finals. To thr point mj's teammates in mythicism are over-rated as this thing. Yet and still in that thing. Mj's former ship teammates own LeBron with inferior parts and high iq execution to make up for it.
this whole debate is a pr midatlantic fake news tabloid digital era based and created farce.
as even in timeline,...lebron has never been anywhere near what Jordan as factually as a player, teammate or all time stat leader as well.
lebron being anywhere near jordan, is lie by tabloid style entertainment rag revisionist.
lebron not even anywhere near mike playing his natural and that is a fact.
art barr