Where Do Apollo Space Rockets Go After Blasting Off From Flat Earth?

[thekingsmen]

So the logic is the sun blocks the stars because it's too bright but we are able to get perfect pictures from NASA cameras. A very lit room on earth can create unwanted photos from a camera.

Didn't know NASA cameras were Sun Proof..

@xCivicx @Swagnificent @Chubbs

 

[xCivicx]

I always thought it was cool how it turned and kinda flipped on it's back and went out over into the ocean.

And thats where they land shortly after liftoff

They curve out of sight and land in the ocean

 

[xCivicx]

shyt is crazy when you think about it, hurdling towards space. It’s hard to imagine...

Because its unhinged fantasy

 

[xCivicx]

The only poster who could actually answer my question isn’t replying to the thread

Yall are gonna have to start compensating me for these plats

 

[xCivicx]

Love how everyone just casually ignored this.

We say it in every thread and its ignored in every thread

 

[xCivicx]

Because of how photography and video works. It's still bright in space due to the sun, and the earth is much closer and extremely brighter than any star. These are Fisher Price My First Conspiracy questions

Actually, according to your science priests, the stars are brightest in the vacuum of space where the earth's atmosphere doesnt obstruct/refract starlight

So the stars should shine much brighter than the earth while a person is in "outer space"

Especially if the earth is blocking the sun from view

And no, the earth is not "much brighter than any star" in space, in any situation

 

[xCivicx]

camera exposure,

try seeing stars standing under a street lamp

Where are the satellites?

They should look like black specks in front of the earth

The camera exposure thing is tired and wrong because the earth doesnt emit its own light and beam it directly at you while youre supposedly in "space"

 

[xCivicx]

Because someone already debuted this bullshyt in another thread a real world experiment using Christmas lights.

Post a link thanks

 

[xCivicx]

You only see the brightest stars in the city. Go out to somewhere rural and you'll see that they're are so many more stars that they drown out the only stars in you can see in the city. With that being said, if you can see the ISS with your naked eye, what's so hard to comprehend about the authenticity of the video it films?

Can you post a photo of the ISS from earth that doesnt just look like a ball of light?

 

[PrnzHakeem]

That's not what I said...

You posting pictures of flat Earth showing curvature of the planet.

A nikka confused

 

[KodeBlue]

Can you post a photo of the ISS from earth that doesnt just look like a ball of light?

I can post a video, with the accompanying photo of the ISS.

 

[xCivicx]

You posting pictures of flat Earth showing curvature of the planet.

A nikka confused

Thats a CGI image of a shuttle in space

Its not a "flat earth" image

 

[KodeBlue]

You posting pictures of flat Earth showing curvature of the planet.

A nikka confused

That's basically what all of these debates boil down to. He painted himself into a corner by posting that photo.

 

[xCivicx]

I can post a video, with the accompanying photo of the ISS.

Looks like a ball of light

I watched most of the video, i didnt see him zoom in on that ball of light at all. Does he do that in any other video?

 

[KodeBlue]

Thats a CGI image of a shuttle in space

I'll ask you the same question I asked somebody earlier. If you can see the ISS with your naked eye, what would make it unfathomable that the ISS is up there shooting real video?