Fury didn't get lazy, he missed a lot of shots as well. Let's not act like his accuracy was anywhere near Floyd's
I’m speaking on his defense when he got dropped
Not lazy but cocky. Tyson's trainer mentioned that he told him to tie up after he slips Wilder's punches not keep trying to make Wilder miss.
How so
I cant help you with the highlights but heres the full fight
His power did bail him out tho
Every self proclaimed "expert" and "purist" on here and in the media acting like Fury outstruck Wilder in every round by a 3-1 margin while hitting 80% of his punches... when in reality there were only 2 rounds where Fury definitively outlanded Wilder by a significant margin, the 3rd and the 10th round. Outside of that, besides the 10-8 knockdown rounds, every round was contested by a difference of at the most 2 punches. Like literally every other damn round of the fight, rounds 1,2,4,5,6,7,8, and 11... all 8 of those rounds both guys landed within 1-2 punches of each other total. That's it!!!!
Like all of y'all saying Fury was robbed and he won every damn second of the fight outside of the knockdowns...what makes you say that, why are y'all so unflinchingly adamant about it? Cause the commentators couldn't go 5 seconds without sucking off Fury and about how "He's been through so much" and "He looks so good!" Cause he throws a bunch of schizophrenic feints every half a second and puts his hands behind his back like Cawhner Muhgregor when he ain't? What exactly did Fury do, what devastating hits did he land in all of these rounds contested by literally 1 or 2 punches at the absolute most that makes you so sure to your heart without doubt that he won convincingly, with no argument to the contrary?? A jab then a hook around the glove that caused no lasting damage and didn't stun Wilder for even half a second? A pawing jab that hit more glove and elbow than it did exposed face? Here's a different question: how much harder do you think the punches Wilder actually did connect with were compared to the punches Fury was landing all fight????
Yes Fury's unorthodox style rendered Wilder much more inaccurate than he usually is, like it does to almost every fighter Fury faces... but it's easy to not be there to be hit when the only strikes you're willing to commit to for the vast majority of the fight are jabs and quick hooks and 1-2s, punches and combinations you're not sitting down on at all because you're almost immediately looking for an exit from any retaliation afterwards. How much should making your opponent miss matter in the eyes of a judge when you're still only outlanding him by literally 1 or 2 punches for the whole round despite him only connecting on 15% or less of his???? When your opponent hits exponentially, colosally harder than you do with the punches he does manage to connect on you with...
I actually had Fury up if it went to a decision like the majority of you and most people seem to have had it... but to act like "There's NO WAY Deontay won ANY SECOND OF THE FIGHT BESIDES WHEN HE KNOCKED HIM DOWN"... in rounds where each guy is landing 4, 5, 6 damn punches for their entirety. To say that there's no way Deontay couldn't have swung a judge's opinion on ANY of them, or that they couldn't be scored as 10-10 draw rounds (most purists would have you believe these don't or shouldn't even exist, but they do and should apply in situations like these I think) and that in combination with the two 10-8 rounds that there's just no way you could ever rationally view this as a draw... IDK man. shyt just seems silly. I think a lot of y'all were just so convinced that a "real boxer" could make Wilder miss every power shot for 12 rounds, like the other 39 times were just flukes, that when he did do it once again, not once but twice, with the 2nd time flatlining that "real technical boxer" that you needed some excuse as to why that too was a fluke and how that should've never happened or mattered. But that's just me
Damn didn't know those numbers of landed hits were so low, esp. the first few rds
Every self proclaimed "expert" and "purist" on here and in the media acting like Fury outstruck Wilder in every round by a 3-1 margin while hitting 80% of his punches... when in reality there were only 2 rounds where Fury definitively outlanded Wilder by a significant margin, the 3rd and the 10th round. Outside of that, besides the 10-8 knockdown rounds, every round was contested by a difference of at the most 2 punches. Like literally every other damn round of the fight, rounds 1,2,4,5,6,7,8, and 11... all 8 of those rounds both guys landed within 1-2 punches of each other total. That's it!!!!
Like all of y'all saying Fury was robbed and he won every damn second of the fight outside of the knockdowns...what makes you say that, why are y'all so unflinchingly adamant about it? Cause the commentators couldn't go 5 seconds without sucking off Fury and about how "He's been through so much" and "He looks so good!" Cause he throws a bunch of schizophrenic feints every half a second and puts his hands behind his back like Cawhner Muhgregor when he ain't? What exactly did Fury do, what devastating hits did he land in all of these rounds contested by literally 1 or 2 punches at the absolute most that makes you so sure to your heart without doubt that he won convincingly, with no argument to the contrary?? A jab then a hook around the glove that caused no lasting damage and didn't stun Wilder for even half a second? A pawing jab that hit more glove and elbow than it did exposed face? Here's a different question: how much harder do you think the punches Wilder actually did connect with were compared to the punches Fury was landing all fight????
Yes Fury's unorthodox style rendered Wilder much more inaccurate than he usually is, like it does to almost every fighter Fury faces... but it's easy to not be there to be hit when the only strikes you're willing to commit to for the vast majority of the fight are jabs and quick hooks and 1-2s, punches and combinations you're not sitting down on at all because you're almost immediately looking for an exit from any retaliation afterwards. How much should making your opponent miss matter in the eyes of a judge when you're still only outlanding him by literally 1 or 2 punches for the whole round despite him only connecting on 15% or less of his???? When your opponent hits exponentially, colosally harder than you do with the punches he does manage to connect on you with...
I actually had Fury up if it went to a decision like the majority of you and most people seem to have had it... but to act like "There's NO WAY Deontay won ANY SECOND OF THE FIGHT BESIDES WHEN HE KNOCKED HIM DOWN"... in rounds where each guy is landing 4, 5, 6 damn punches for their entirety. To say that there's no way Deontay couldn't have swung a judge's opinion on ANY of them, or that they couldn't be scored as 10-10 draw rounds (most purists would have you believe these don't or shouldn't even exist, but they do and should apply in situations like these I think) and that in combination with the two 10-8 rounds that there's just no way you could ever rationally view this as a draw... IDK man. shyt just seems silly. I think a lot of y'all were just so convinced that a "real boxer" could make Wilder miss every power shot for 12 rounds, like the other 39 times were just flukes, that when he did do it once again, not once but twice, with the 2nd time flatlining that "real technical boxer" that you needed some excuse as to why that too was a fluke and how that should've never happened or mattered. But that's just me
