Religion/Spirituality what's with all the atheists on the coli?

[ExodusNirvana]

God just spoke to you, thru me.

Ask that nikka about 2001 breh

WTF!!! The Yankees were like 2 Outs away! You gonna let NY get hit with the 9/11 shyt and then I pray every night for the Torre Dynasty to continue and you pull that bullshyt?

AND WHERE'S MY OPTIMUS PRIME FROM CHRISTMAS 87! I AIN'T FORGET

 

[Kritic]

a lot of the stuff in the bible is common sense and universal laws. you can get that sh1t anywhere. there are good books all over the place. that doesn't make the bible sacred.
if your pastor is fuccin b1tches in church and always asking for forgiveness but still spitting ether should we not be paying attention to the message?! the "message" is still a tool used to confuse ppl. your pastors are filthey rich laughing at you nuccas.

how would you know how the message is being used? "hope" and "pray" that it's being used the right way?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

According to your stance......

My stance makes no difference.​

 

[Will Ross]

They think it makes them smart
.

 

[No1]

Is everyone cool with keeping anything tangentially related to this religious discussion in here because it gets cluttered when people start making all those spin offs. As for the topic, I couldn't care less. Another person's beliefs don't bother me if they're a good person, only matters when they trying to impose their beliefs on me. Believe whatever you want, just keep society secular and KIM.

*Does the Kanye West "Jesus Walks" dance out of the thread*

 

[Chris.B]

They think it makes them smart
.

^^^^^^^

 

[T-K-G]

religious people thinking atheists a bunch of uppity negroes on the internet tryin too hard to look smart

atheist shooting at religious types for taking everything in the bible literally (even though they probably don't take it as literal as you may think)

a nikka really tried to use "you never saw dinosaurs yet you believe they exists" to defend his religious beliefs even tho we got fossils on deck


i dont really care for either side but this thread is full of on both sides

 

[criminology]

atheists just believe in one less god than you do, otherwise they are the same.

also the bible got the easiest moral question of humanity (slavery) wrong. why would i shape my life around the guidance of a book when it gets such a basic thing wrong?

 

[Chris.B]

atheists just believe in one less god than you do, otherwise they are the same.

also the bible got the easiest moral question of humanity (slavery) wrong. why would i shape my life around the guidance of a book when it gets such a basic thing wrong?

Explain to me how you came to that conclusion

 

[criminology]

Explain to me how you came to that conclusion

that slavery is the easiest moral question or that the bible got it wrong? the first one is my opinion. the second is that the bible doesn't condemn slavery, just gives you rules. For example...

Leviticus Chapter 25, verse 44:
Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. You can will them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.

it's true slavery was different and accepted then. but ownership of human beings is and it shows me that the morality it is advocating not modern enough and contradicts my beliefs that slavery is evil. compare it to the godless morality buddhists advocate. they tried to destroy the caste system and felt all living creatures were equal and we should have compassion for all of them. which one do you think is a stronger code of ethics?

 

[Chris.B]

that slavery is the easiest moral question or that the bible got it wrong? the first one is my opinion. the second is that the bible doesn't condemn slavery, just gives you rules. For example...

Leviticus Chapter 25, verse 44:
Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. You can will them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.

it's true slavery was different and accepted then. but ownership of human beings is and it shows me that the morality it is advocating not modern enough and contradicts my beliefs that slavery is evil. compare it to the godless morality buddhists advocate. they tried to destroy the caste system and felt all living creatures were equal and we should have compassion for all of them. which one do you think is a stronger code of ethics?

Let me ask you the difference between Old and New Testament....

Do you know if I follow the old testament alone I'm not a Christian?

 

[Nefflum nigga]

People feel how they feel.


doesn't bother me if you believe in God or not, that's all you. Thats None of my business. all I can do is remain righteous. Regardless of what belief the next man has.

 

[criminology]

Let me ask you the difference between Old and New Testament....

Do you know if I follow the old testament alone I'm not a Christian?

I won't even get into how much of a rationalization that argument is, but there are quotes in the NT about it too. But here is where your argument gets in trouble:
Matthew 5:18 – Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

 

[Chris.B]

I won't even get into how much of a rationalization that argument is, but there are quotes in the NT about it too. But here is where your argument gets in trouble:
Matthew 5:18 – Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

lol

Jesus came to fulfill prophesy that was what he was referring to when he was asked about the law of prophets. (Prophet Isaiah declared he will establish a new kingdom and set new rules) So yes Jesus was right when he said he was fulfilling the law of the prophets.

Be careful if you are going to debate me in Theology I have education in it in addition to my IT degree...

The Old testament and most of the law of Moses are no longer valid because of the price Jesus paid on the cross.

Get at me.

 

[criminology]

lol

Jesus came to fulfill prophesy that was what he was referring to when he was asked about the law of prophets. (Prophet Isaiah declared he will establish a new kingdom and set new rules) So yes Jesus was right when he said he was fulfilling the law of the prophets.

Be careful if you are going to debate me in Theology I have education in it in addition to my IT degree...

The Old testament and most of the law of Moses are no longer valid because of the price Jesus paid on the cross.

Get at me.

ok why would god write a book allowing slavery only later to say it was wrong? shyt is empty of sense. you probably do know more about the bible but thats because i didn't get a degree in fairy tales