get these nets
Veteran
Thanks, but why would the USA be at the center of your definition of pan africanism?Im just stating facts because lies/opinions like the ones I highlighted at the start of this thread have been going on too long without being seriously checked
It's a combo of both
true...and that's what this thread will do
I never said other groups didn't partake in forms of Pan-Africanism; Im just making it clear that Aframs are the founders of it's modern triangular form, where the entire african diaspora falls under ONE people (black) and that they have showed the most pan-africanist spirit; domestically and internationally
again, these ARE NOT involved with TRIANGULAR (modern pan-africanism) concerns of the afro-atlantic (USA mainland + rest of the Americas + Africa)
This isn't a slight, but in current coli climate I have to preface the comment that way......the % of enslaved Africans sent to the modern day United States was 5% of the estimated total. On what basis would a person objectively list the USA mainland as it's own separate base of the Afro-Atlantic in a triangle?...and list the other 95% as a base?
If that's your definition, then it would ignore measures and actions taken across other colonies (former colonies) and Africa.
I thought you would include measures taken between people/organizations/govt.s of different countries or across different regions and Africa as Panafricanism.
I could see North America,Caribbean,Central America, + South America being seen as separate bases and cooperation between any of these regions AND African territory being in the definition.
Because of the ties that colonies had over the Euro flag that flew over them, there are probably examples of Africans in Cuba (Caribbean) linking up with Africans in Venuzuela(South America) about matters relating to West Africa.
You would not consider this an example of triangular Panafricanism?