Black smoke and cac jokes
Your daps are mine
How is joining EU destructive to Ukrainian policies or economy? Are people really confusing EU and EMU?
"Regime Change" connotes open invasion and that is not happening. Overall, American efforts at installing friendly governments have had limited success in the latter half of the 20th century. They were most successful in the late 19th and early 20th century with shytty banana republics, and that was mostly through private proxies. When it comes to straight-up engineering a grassroots coup, America can't do it. They tried in almost every communist country in the cold war and did not succeed. The Prague Spring came as a huge shock to them.
You honestly believe the average Ukrainian is affected by Syria? As opposed to the years and years of bullying and strong-arming over gas prices? The only people in the Ukraine who have love for Russia are Ukranians of Russian descent.
I cant wait till assad is destroyed.
Can't wait for ww3 breh?
Not going to happen no World War 3 breh. Too much pride and stuff at stake. You will see like I said a previous post days ago.. You will see crazy ass alliances etc...
1. Regime Change doesn't connotes invasion. The media handles the situation as far as what is told on the ground and the U.N. prepares with NATO to create strict rules and tactics. Limited Success? have you seen 20 plus years of friendly governments in Iran after 1953, what about Pinochet government for well over a decade more...Poppy Dock and Baby Dock, Indonesian government in the 70's. There are many governments successful thanks to U.S. backed support in the late 20th Century.
The "Orange Revolution" was designed by the U.S.....this is common knowledge.
Syria isn't affecting Ukraine, it's the fact that it maybe a punishment for embarrassing the U.S. in Syria.
If thats what it takes to get that piece of trash out of power who cares. You gotta die some day. Pain is temporary compared to a lifetime of being a bytch.Can't wait for ww3 breh?
...what did I say? The US doesn't engineer true grassroots coups. It just gets behind strongmen. The media may spin a narrative "on the ground" but in the case of Americans, that narrative is essentially always wrong or overstated, whereas nations like the Soviets had the clandestine ops to trigger mass populist revolts.
Papa Doc was a strongman who came to power without American. The Shah was installed not just by America, but a consortium of nations, all of whom gangbanged Iran. When they tried to unilaterally RE-install the Shah, America failed. Pinochet is the same as Papa Doc. The U.S. supported Pinochet AFTER the coup.
America doesn't do "Arab Spring." America doesn't do "Orange Revolution." They just come in late and say, hey, you guys want money, or sit on their hands and do nothing at all like the Prague Spring.
But even if I take all of your examples at face value:
Failed airdrops of insurgents into China
Failed airdrops of insurgents into N. Korea
The Vietnam War
Bay of Pigs
The failure to inspire insurgency in EVERY eastern bloc country.
Failure to defeat the MPLA in Angola
The failed Venezuelan coup of 2002
The Green Revolution in Iran
Believe me, my list is far longer than yours.
We're good at giving existing political parties money, or giving weapons and support to strongmen. But we DON'T DO and NEVER HAVE DONE Arab Spring.
No. It's really not.
This isn't a sentence.
Word? How much less could you care?I could care less which side wins.