What has changed in America where nobody can stay married?

King Jae

Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
5,312
Reputation
865
Daps
16,193
Life was always about instant gratification. Looking through history, the rich always had their choices, and they imposed restraint on the poor. Rules are for the uninformed.
Very true but the uninformed behave like their rich nowadays because they have been brainwashed to believe they are just like them. The accessibility of social media removes the mystique so they look at the rich like normal ppl now and use it to justify their actions and lifestyle choices
 

CrimsonTider

Seduce & Scheme
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
82,245
Reputation
-13,974
Daps
130,323
Marriage is great for both the male and female because you are taking 2 incomes and assets and becoming something that you couldn't have with 1 salary.

Divorce hurts both man and women equally because you are going from 2 incomes to 1. And you are accustom to living like this.
 
  • Dap
Reactions: Yup

s3ven_LvLs

All Star
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
1,046
Reputation
280
Daps
2,886
This mentality is exactly the reason why you nikkas will not get back your spot as men. You nikkas want to be equal to irrational women whose emotions change like the wind.

I promise they don't understand bruh. :snoop: It's like either they have not experienced women in general enough or they just rather stay in the matrix.

I'm just glad I know better now and I will keep trying to explain it to those I think will understand and be constructive with that knowledge but I'm not gonna shed a

tear for those who don't.
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
249,432
Reputation
30,853
Daps
762,891
Reppin
Top 4
Its not bad for the male.

Its bad if the male decided to take care of fully able adult during marriage and is ordered to pay Alimony(which is very rare and only used if the 1 spouse stays at home) and alimony is only used for a short period of time.

Or if the wife gets full custody and the male pays child support. which has nothing to do with marriage.

The only money and assets acquired during marriage is the only thing eligible to be split up. which is fair.

:dahell:

if a man marries a woman and they have a kid and she decidese to stay home to save on daycare costs etc. if a divorce happens there will be ALIMONY, Secondly the court can grant spousal support for an indefinite period or a definite period, it's up to the judge.

and you are worng with the only money and assets acquired during marriage, if a man has a house prior before marriage and then marries adn the wife moves into his house, a property before marriage or any assets can become Matrimonial assets
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
249,432
Reputation
30,853
Daps
762,891
Reppin
Top 4
Marriage is great for both the male and female because you are taking 2 incomes and assets and becoming something that you couldn't have with 1 salary.

Divorce hurts both man and women equally because you are going from 2 incomes to 1. And you are accustom to living like this.

you don't need marriage to combine two assets

divorce does not hurt men and women equally if it did it would not be 3/4th of women filing divorce.
 

Jhoon

Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
16,518
Reputation
1,505
Daps
37,704
Very true but the uninformed behave like their rich nowadays because they have been brainwashed to believe they are just like them. The accessibility of social media removes the mystique so they look at the rich like normal ppl now and use it to justify their actions and lifestyle choices
But heres the ironic part: the well off are marrying. Poor folks trying to emulate the rich but losing site of the larger picture.
 

CrimsonTider

Seduce & Scheme
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
82,245
Reputation
-13,974
Daps
130,323
:dahell:

if a man marries a woman and they have a kid and she decidese to stay home to save on daycare costs etc. if a divorce happens there will be ALIMONY, Secondly the court can grant spousal support for an indefinite period or a definite period, it's up to the judge.

and you are worng with the only money and assets acquired during marriage, if a man has a house prior before marriage and then marries adn the wife moves into his house, a property before marriage or any assets can become Matrimonial assets
No, you're wrong.

Indefinite alimony only happens in the rare cases where a divorce happens in very old age and the spouse would be unable to enter the workforce.

If a married couple decides that it is best for the women to stay at home and raise kids then she SHOULD get Alimony. no question about it.

Her staying at home allowed the man to increase his income and earning potential.

And The house doesn't become an asset. The equity gained in the house during the marriage becomes the matrimonial asset.
 

Jhoon

Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
16,518
Reputation
1,505
Daps
37,704
:dahell:

if a man marries a woman and they have a kid and she decidese to stay home to save on daycare costs etc. if a divorce happens there will be ALIMONY, Secondly the court can grant spousal support for an indefinite period or a definite period, it's up to the judge.

and you are worng with the only money and assets acquired during marriage, if a man has a house prior before marriage and then marries adn the wife moves into his house, a property before marriage or any assets can become Matrimonial assets
You have little idea what youre talking about.
 

CrimsonTider

Seduce & Scheme
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
82,245
Reputation
-13,974
Daps
130,323
you don't need marriage to combine two assets

divorce does not hurt men and women equally if it did it would not be 3/4th of women filing divorce.
Man, what are you talking about.

You don't need marriage to combine assets but marriage gives you a whole host of other benefits. Legislated and intangible.

Most women file for divorce because society has told them all their lives that they should work towards being a good wife to a man.

They get married and realize this isn't really what the hell they want and society lied to them.
 

Chris.B

Banned
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
18,922
Reputation
-4,604
Daps
21,892
Whats outdated about divorce and marriage laws?

One is a legal contract conjoining assets.

And another is resolution to split assets acquired DURING the marriage

The laws are fine
pre-nups protecting a man's asset BEFORE marriage are now being thrown out of court.
Clearly there is something wrong with the laws.

The marriage rate will keep dropping because most men are smartening up
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
249,432
Reputation
30,853
Daps
762,891
Reppin
Top 4
No, you're wrong.

Indefinite alimony only happens in the rare cases where a divorce happens in very old age and the spouse would be unable to enter the workforce.

If a married couple decides that it is best for the women to stay at home and raise kids then she SHOULD get Alimony. no question about it.

Her staying at home allowed the man to increase his income and earning potential.

And The house doesn't become an asset. The equity gained in the house during the marriage becomes the matrimonial asset.

I'm wrong?
i worked in a family law courthouse for years and sat in on thousands of cases.
1. Indefinite alimony is up to the judges discretion.

I've seen old ass dudes quit their job to try and get out of it but it doesn't work.

2/ For a matrimonial home it does not matter if one spouse is not on house title, or if one spouse brought the home into the marriage with them. No matter what, each spouse has an equal right to possession of the matrimonial home. If only one spouse is on title to the house, then that person is entitled to keep the house (because it’s in their name), but they must pay the other party 50% of the value of that house on date of separation. The claim on the matrimonial home does not require that the person be on house title, that they have contributed money toward the house, or even that they work at all. This claim is rooted in the court’s viewpoint that the marriage is a partnership, and that both parties contribute to the best of their ability.
 
Top