What gaming franchises would you say didn’t have “safe” sequels?
- Thread starter Gizmo_Duck
- Start date
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
I don't even think prime was a drastic departure from the mainline series. It's metroid in 3d. I feel like the transition was the same as every other game that made the transition from 2d to 3d.
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
Yeah, even if you did want to consider it a direct sequel to super metroid, its not really an “un-safe” one
Early NES sequels thought a new game had to be completely different. Playing it safe seemed like a ripoff. The first 3 of these NES games changed for the 2nd title then went BACK to the formula of the first game.
Mario 2 US - insane 2D platformer. Completely different mechanics. Lifebar, picking up objects, multiple characters. Even though in Japan they got a "safe" SMB2, in America, marketing gave us this out of left field game.
Castlevania 2 - 1st was a 2d action game. 2 is a Metroid style game with a day and night cycle and very convoluted puzzles and item management.
Zelda 2 - turned onto a 2d action RPG with XP points. XP were a relatively new idea in NES games.
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 2 - first was a weird 2d action platformer with an overworld. Difficult in its own right. The sequel is a classic beat'em up.
Wind Waker - everyone was expecting a more "mature" Zelda game since it was the xtreme 2000s and Nintendo released a video demo of an adult Link. Instead we got a cartoon adventure that wasn't fully appreciated till later.
Metroid Prime - abandoned the 2d style Metroid genre it created, for a First Person Scanner. Shooting is involved but the scanning was an amazing part that became the focus after Miyamoto suggested it.
Star Fox Adventures - on rails space shooter became a 3D action adventure. Wasn't well received but the Star Fox franchise is stagnant and they tried something new.
Final Fantasy 9 - you could argue this was safe or wasn't. But a choice was made. Breaking from the futuristic and very successful high-tech style of 7 and 8, FF9 was a purposeful throwback to the medieval fantasy style RPG. Bringing back the black mages from the older games, having a regular knight as a character and then making the main characters childlike and Disney safe princess and thief. This was a goodbye letter to the old style as the future was going to be more mature and pushing the boundaries.
Mario 2 US - insane 2D platformer. Completely different mechanics. Lifebar, picking up objects, multiple characters. Even though in Japan they got a "safe" SMB2, in America, marketing gave us this out of left field game.
Castlevania 2 - 1st was a 2d action game. 2 is a Metroid style game with a day and night cycle and very convoluted puzzles and item management.
Zelda 2 - turned onto a 2d action RPG with XP points. XP were a relatively new idea in NES games.
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 2 - first was a weird 2d action platformer with an overworld. Difficult in its own right. The sequel is a classic beat'em up.
Wind Waker - everyone was expecting a more "mature" Zelda game since it was the xtreme 2000s and Nintendo released a video demo of an adult Link. Instead we got a cartoon adventure that wasn't fully appreciated till later.
Metroid Prime - abandoned the 2d style Metroid genre it created, for a First Person Scanner. Shooting is involved but the scanning was an amazing part that became the focus after Miyamoto suggested it.
Star Fox Adventures - on rails space shooter became a 3D action adventure. Wasn't well received but the Star Fox franchise is stagnant and they tried something new.
Final Fantasy 9 - you could argue this was safe or wasn't. But a choice was made. Breaking from the futuristic and very successful high-tech style of 7 and 8, FF9 was a purposeful throwback to the medieval fantasy style RPG. Bringing back the black mages from the older games, having a regular knight as a character and then making the main characters childlike and Disney safe princess and thief. This was a goodbye letter to the old style as the future was going to be more mature and pushing the boundaries.
The Devil's Advocate
Call me Dad
Then make The Witcher: Assassin's Creed... Don't b*stardize Assassin's Creed after 15 games and make it into the Witcher by removing everything having to do with the Assassins and Templars
NZA
LOL
Not necessarily a sequel, but there is continuity in Zelda.
This had people losing their minds
this is the one they showed in magazines leading up to windwaker. bait and switch like a motherfukker
7th Letter Specialist
99’ Expedition w/ the TV’s in it..
Saturday Night SlamMasters
Mantis Toboggan M.D.
Drink wolf cola
We ended up not even really getting a main character in AC: Odyssey
. Every minor line of dialogue is picked by the player so there’s no defining traits to them for the player to connect with.
TheWiseWon
Pro
Bboystyle
Bang Bang Packers gang!
WoW is not a sequel
WoW is not a sequel
WoW is a continuation of the story from Warcraft 3:The Frozen Throne.
It might be an mmo instead of an rts, but story wise its very much a sequel. We never got a warcraft 4 cuz WoW was the next mainline game in the franchise.
Bboystyle
Bang Bang Packers gang!
no the fukk it isnt
WoW is the online unviverse of Azeroth that ties ALL warcraft games into it. It is not a direct sequel to an already PART 3 of the warcraft game