No I'm not, you've been beaten so handily you're not even sure what you're arguing anymore.
Let me help you,
Poitier: "Michel Jordan's midrange style would still be just as effective against zone defenses"
Alright, let's hear it
Most of jordans scoring was from the midrange on the wizards and it was effective when zones where allowed in his last two seasons.No I'm not, you've been beaten so handily you're not even sure what you're arguing anymore.
Let me help you,
Poitier: "Michel Jordan's midrange style would still be just as effective against zone defenses"
Alright, let's hear it
Win without a team surrounded with the top talent in the league. You know carry a team.
Post up game
*looks at the trailblazers blowing a 15 point fourth quarter lead in game 6 with Scottie and 4 reserves in the game, the bulls winning game 6 in 1996 by double digits with Michael shooting 5-19, and the jazz's second and third leading scorers in the 1998 finals averaging just 10.6 and 9.7 points* go point out which teams in the 90's were more talented than what Chicago hadWin without a team surrounded with the top talent in the league. You know carry a team.
While Lebron is better at Getting thereJordan is way better at not losing in the Finals.
This has to be a lie. I thought Jordan never had a bad game*looks at the trailblazers blowing a 15 point fourth quarter lead in game 6 with Scottie and 4 reserves in the game, the bulls winning game 6 in 1996 by double digits with Michael shooting 5-19, and the jazz's second and third leading scorers in the 1998 finals averaging just 10.6 and 9.7 points* go point out which teams in the 90's were more talented than Chicago had
While Jordan is better at winning rings.While Lebron is better at Getting there