I agree that the labels are weird. In a true sense Haitians themselves should be considered the first latinos since they were the first latin American country along with speaking a latin language. This is just my opinion.
So Haiti couldve had Spanish as the official language and not Haitian Creole or French if the cards were played different years ago?
Spain > France
a lot of black american women still do have that shape.
but diet is a huge factor........ the american diet is poison ............. so this same Dominican chick in NYC.... her daughter might end up fukked up.
Wow they look very Polynesian. Could pass as hawaiiansThis is what Tainos look like.
![]()
![]()
You see any Puerto Ricans, Dominicans and Cubans that look like that?![]()
Yea.. if dominicans even wanted that barren ass part of the island
![]()
Yet it wasn't Dominicans who were controlling the island at the time.
And mind you Saint-Domingue(Haiti) was the richest part...
i use the term native or indigenous, depending on which language im using/which continent im currently onIf you can name your tribe, you can skip the "Native American" label altogether. If you've forgotten your tribe, having a specific tribal identity is lost. So you can use other terms like "Aboriginal" or "Indigenous" to skip the "Native American" label. It's just outside of certain places like Canada, "Aboriginal" and "Indigenous" don't pop up as much. Similar to an African-American who knows his or her specific tribal ancestry can say "I am of the ____ diaspora" and skip the American label too (if need be).
Hispanic, Latino and Latin, All words that in truth just mean mixed person of native American/Arawak/Carib + African + white. Some have more of one type of DNA then the others so that's why you will get the Latino who are basically Spaniards and the ones that are no different then a African American besides the fact that they speak Spanish.
Its like a specific group of mixed people becoming their own race because they fit some broad criteria. Imagine if Brazilians were given the same treatment LOL, would get more confusing.
All of these indigenous people of the Caribbean islands today have some black or European ancestry.
Black Caribs
![]()
Indigenous Caribs
![]()
Caribs today (Obvious some african dna maybe even some European too)
![]()
![]()
![]()
Nasio Fontaine (Reggae Artist from Dominica) a Black Carib. African Father/Carib Mother
He's a great Roots Reggae Artist too.
![]()
![]()
![]()
gets further complicated by the fact that the iberian peninsula was called Hispania. portuguese people would thus technically be hispanic, but would refer to their language as lusophone and their culture as lusitanic, even though the term hispania was created when portuguese was still strongly connected to galician, which is only "spanish" in the sense that it's part of the same peninsula as spain and portugal. and franco used the term hispanic to describe all spanish-speaking peoples, regardless of which side of the ocean they were on.I'll check out the videos later, but it seems quite obvious to me that "Hispanic" refers to those who speak Spanish, which is why Brazilians or French-speaking people from the Caribbean are not included under the "Hispanic" denomination. "Hispanophone" would be the correct term though. I believe it's just Americans who use the "Hispanic" term, which is an easy way to define all Spanish-speaking people in the US. French-speakers are more likely to use "Hispanophone"
"Latino" seems to come from the fact that well all of South America was colonized by so-called "Latin" countries (Spain, Portugal, and France), and it's an easy way to make a difference with the "Anglo-Saxon" America.
For Native South Americans, I can understand being called either is incorrect. However, for anyone who does have Spanish or Portuguese ancestry, you do have some Latin in you![]()
Is this Puerto Ricans and Domicans or Mexicans and Cubanscause the latter two are very different from the the former two.