First off Im not Catholic
And I’m probably not even Christian judging by your definition/image of today’s church
Anyways, a quick google tells me:
The English form of the name "Jesus" is derived from the Latin Iēsus, which in turn comes from the Greek Ἰησοῦς (Iēsoûs). The Greek is a Hellenized form of the Hebrew name
Yēšua (ישוע), which is in turn a shortened form of Hebrew Yehōšua (יהושע) or "Joshua" in English.
[1]
שוע), which is in turn a shortened form of Hebrew Yehōšua (יהושע) (or "Joshua" in English)
(Yehoshu’a) meaning “YAHWEH is salvation so that’s what I’ll go with
It just makes sense.
Here’s something to consider,
You can see Jesus as a figure (real or fake) representing “the word” “son of god” “sinless” a “great prophet” the “Christ” “messiah” or whatever title fits. Whatever sparks your imagination.
Fine. But Most importantly he died for sins as his name suggests. I’m sure you know the scripture Jesus says that’s why God sent him. His purpose on earth.
To believe that you have to accept he’s a real human who was born, lived and died (and resurrected).
Nobody believes this but Christians
And that’s the core foundation belief of “Christianity” as simple as it gets
it’s about forgiveness and salvation for Gods people one way or another
This is the same theme/ message throughout the entire OT (minus Jesus)
we can debate about religion, theology, Bible interpretations, Jesus parallels and similarities to other religions, languages and it’s meanings but all that is irrelevant (to me at least) if you don’t understand or at least acknowledge this basic concept we will never see eye to eye.
Because what you post keeps dancing around the “Concept” of Jesus and what he “might or can be” but never takes a concrete stance on what he is or is not.
I know you love your theories but you gotta make a decision breh