From what I understand:
Spence has held firm on his insistence to clean up his "side of the street."
Meaning he wasn't even going to show up to the negotiations table until he beat the PBC welters.
With that understanding, I sincerely doubt that I'll ever agree with anyone that wants me to believe that Errol hasn't deliberately avoided Terence Crawford, in spite of the fact that Crawford is one of the more highly touted, accomplished, and active fighters in the welterweight division.
Furthermore, Crawford publicly criticized his former promoter for not being able to secure the Spence fight. We have seen footage of Crawford challenging Spence in person, and now we know for certain that he was asking for the Spence fight to be made behind the scenes. The opposite can be said for Spence, who has a record of tweets, interviews, press conferences and etcetera where he has gone on the record to explain why he refuses to fight Crawford.
I suppose if I use terms like duck or avoid, then people might misconstrue my intentions and think I'm calling Spence scared, which is not the truth.
He made a financial decision, and it has resulted in the top two welterweights not fighting for years now.
I'm a fan of Errol, too. I was in the building for Spence Porter, and while I remember the voracious cheers when Spence was awarded the decision, I also remember the collective displeasure when Danny Twelve Toes was ushered into the ring. Wasn't anyone asking for that shyt, everyone wanted to see Spence Crawford. Only after Spence was in a life threatening car accident was that fight even seen as passable.
Lastly, I think it's pretty clear that if the inverse scenario was true -- Crawford had a bevy of Top Rank welters to fight, and Spence was consistently passed over -- then many of the same posters in here would be shytting on Bob and Crawford for ducking Errol and hurting the sport.
Those are my thoughts.