How is what I said a moral victory? I merely pointed out that the US has made it farther than traditional and recent powerhouses. That's a fact.
Breh its just a lazy joke, stop being so sensitive
And you're ignoring the fact of group placements. If the groups had been slightly different then the teams in the knockout stages most likely would've been totally different. Spain is obvs still a better team than the US's for example. Obvs on paper the US's group looked tpugh as facc for them but ghana bottled it as per and portugal was just
as a team bar ronaldo...y'all deserve to be in the knockout stages though don't think im saying you dont
But to get back to the thread, if US starts taking football seriiusly, id say it might take around 30 years to get a squad that could win the world cup...alot of you are forgetting that there are a few countries that already have all the facilities and coaching staff that you guys are "what if'ing" about with the US in place and still don't do fucc all...eg England lol
Lastly, i get what you american brehs are saying with the what if we bred players with ultra althleticism and were taught well enough to a point where they had equal skillsets to rest of the world...but sorry to break it down to you, but that still doesn't mean you'll dominate. Football is an extremely tactical sport and you can have a retarded collection of talented players and still do fucc all in the top tournaments because the teams tactics is fucced up and/or you just don't have the temperment for it for whatever reason...see man city and the champions league
Also, thinking you're going to get 11 ultra athletes suited to football that also have top tier skillsets all at one time to be in the same team together regardless of how big the talent pool is is just
levels of delusion and wishful thinking....