Champion
#RxLife #UCF #FAMU
Crazy that ppl feel the need to defend that $70 price tag. Why?
and to this day i have never had micro transactions in sony 1st party games so obviously the 10 dollars is doing the trick
I will gladly pay 10 dollars more for games if it means i don’t have to buy seasonal packs and DLC every two months like i had to do with street fighter or any other fighting game or they don’t soft cap progression forcing you to buy boosters
Cartridges cost more than disc- based media more often than not,.They still bytchin
Where was all this concern when we were being raped 30 years ago by Nintendo?
Because of tribalism. People identify with the brands of products they consume. This tribalism is the same sort of tribalism that gets people into not wearing mask and arguing over the science of a vaccine because some political figure does it. It's like the republican voters that irrationally argue for policies that negatively affect them in red states and vote against their self interest.Crazy that ppl feel the need to defend that $70 price tag. Why?
Because of tribalism. People identify with the brands of products they consume. This tribalism is the same sort of tribalism that gets people into not wearing mask and arguing over the science of a vaccine because some political figure does it. It's like the republican voters that irrationally argue for policies that negatively affect them in red states and vote against their self interest.
The internet has only accelerated all this tribalism. As a consumer it's better you not get too attached to these brands because all of them aren't really on your side and the first clear opportunity they get they'll screw you.
Sony Q1 FY2021 (Apr-June) Results - PS5: 2.3m (LTD: 10.1m), PS4: 0.5m (LTD: 116.4m) / Best Q1 Revenue in video game history Sales - Sony
In the last quarterly report Sony brought in 1.28 billion in sales off selling actual games. They brought in 1.88 billion off selling additional content for those games.
The price of games went up you just didn't notice because it's deceptive. 33% is DLC and 23% is games.
Sony doesn't need nickel and dime transactions in their games because other developers have that covered and Sony gets a piece of all that. Sony makes 1st party games to entice people to buy their hardware and get you in the ecosystem. From there everything you buy makes them money.
The $10 thing is because Take Two did it and got away with it. That's how gaming works. When one company does something and gets away with it others copy the move simply because they can.
‘ Let’s criticize other publishers for charging to play games online or not dropping the price of their software, but defend a $10 increase in software pricing on your preferred platform.’
Make it make sense, brehs.
Yeah.The additional in-game content isn’t from sony 1st party games that charge the extra 10 dollars it from F2P shyt like fortnite, warzone, and genshin.
Sony Q1 FY2021 (Apr-June) Results - PS5: 2.3m (LTD: 10.1m), PS4: 0.5m (LTD: 116.4m) / Best Q1 Revenue in video game history Sales - Sony
In the last quarterly report Sony brought in 1.28 billion in sales off selling actual games. They brought in 1.88 billion off selling additional content for those games.
The price of games went up you just didn't notice because it's deceptive. 33% is DLC and 23% is games.
Sony doesn't need nickel and dime transactions in their games because other developers have that covered and Sony gets a piece of all that. Sony makes 1st party games to entice people to buy their hardware and get you in the ecosystem. From there everything you buy makes them money.
The $10 thing is because Take Two did it and got away with it. That's how gaming works. When one company does something and gets away with it others copy the move simply because they can.
Yeah.
Nobody should be charging for online play anymore. Fortnite has proven that it's in their best interest to get more people playing these games and get microtransactions off them. It's just a relic of the past that companies haven't let go of. Maybe Microsoft with their free to play Halo multiplayer is looking at another way though. I doubt it.‘ Let’s criticize other publishers for charging to play games online or not dropping the price of their software, but defend a $10 increase in software pricing on your preferred platform.’
Make it make sense, brehs.
Go ahead and do that. I'll vote with my wallet. The price increase has negatively impacted both my purchasing habits and my gaming habits. The only $70 game I've purchased was Ratchet and Clank and had I bought it today I'd be getting the same game and experience for less and wouldn't have given up anything really for it.Ok, so if i get to spend 70 dollars on the games i actually play and don’t have to be nickel and dimed beyond that price, i don’t care. Let the F2P people fund my 1st party games.
Like i said, yall can they to make this 10 dollar thing a mountain but at the end of the day the software is king.
If sony stops putting out amazing software you have an argument here. Sony dictates the market with their quality, if they dip in quality then someone else can write the rules.
This is how it works, always has. It’s also why nintendo gets to freely play in their own lane with insane pricing because people can only play zelda and mario on nintendo and those games are high quality experiences so they can charge whatever they feel its worth
Go ahead and do that. I'll vote with my wallet. The price increase has negatively impacted both my purchasing habits and my gaming habits. The only $70 game I've purchased was Ratchet and Clank and had I bought it today I'd be getting the same game and experience for less and wouldn't have given up anything really for it.
https://www.gamestop.com/video-game...ank-rift-apart----playstation-5/11118328.html
I'll let yall handle that $10 since yall like it. Makes no sense for me to be buying these games at inflated prices when really they come back down so fast.