Washington and Golden State are close on a trade sending Chris Paul to the Warriors for Jordan Poole, sources tell @TheAthletic @Stadium
- Thread starter Morethan1
- Start date
So becuse
“Hey it doesn’t matter what he do we’re going to be terrible anyways!”
Lol shyt if the fans like that shyt hey god bless ‘em
So because you plan on being terrible your plan is to keep making additional terrible moves? That’s the logic for the Wizards rebuild?
“Hey it doesn’t matter what he do we’re going to be terrible anyways!”
Lol shyt if the fans like that shyt hey god bless ‘em
Id have pissed Beal off and taken it to the trade deadline than take that bullshyt. In a world where Rudy Gobert was dealt for five 1sts
tremonthustler1
aka bx_representer
So right now Washington got
C ????
PF ?????
SF Kispert?
SG Poole
PG Jones
Whitmore or bust
C ????
PF ?????
SF Kispert?
SG Poole
PG Jones
Whitmore or bust
VegetasHairline
Veteran
They aren't gonna be good for awhile anyway. He's 24. It's not an awful use.Not be idiotic and blow it… is that too crazy of an ask from a “wizard” front office
But like I asked you tho do YOU think spending 130 million on Jordan Poole is a good use of cap space?
It's not like Washington has a history of signing free agents either.
It's not all about starting, but who's gonna be in the closing lineup... They gonna have Chris Paul not see the court late in games? Cause their roster is gonna look funky
Black Mamba
Superstar
They tryna be like Lakers last yrWarriors got older
Lets see how this turns out
VegetasHairline
Veteran
Why are you assuming they're building around Jordan Poole?
Wizards have no one to pay so how much poole makes isn't really relevant currently, they'll move him if need be.You think a “nucleus” built around Jordan Poole and his 130 million dollar contract is a “good thing”Did you not watch him at all last year?
I didn't say it would, it's just what the team is thinking. He may embrace having his own team and flourish, similar to someone like a Zach Lavine. Chances of that are slim but it's something consider.
He wasn't actually on the market, nobody inquired about poole really, this was mostly sudden. I think if you put up a sign that said "Poole For Sale" you'd get better offers than what they got for Beal and KP off of youth and potential alone.
I agree, but that's partially why the Wiz did this because this is a calculated risk, if he continues to play like shyt and doesn't progress "who gives a fukk we were losing anyway hoping for a #1 pick"
If he plays well and blossoms into an all-star over the next few years "well now we have something to build around." There's no risk involved at all, just reward. And you get a pick.
Buying out CP3 and getting nothing back is just a sunk cost.
He has 4 years
Golden State Warriors Team Payroll | Basketball-Reference.com
Payroll summary for the Golden State Warriors
www.basketball-reference.com
If he had that much upside you guys wouldn’t have gotten him for a 38 year old PG and his old team wouldn’t have had to give you picks to take his contract
VegetasHairline
Veteran
Rudy Gobert didn't have a no trade clause.
Jordan Poole is the new Bradley Beal 
He’ll have a 5 year $350 million contract by 2027 with a no trade clause
He’ll have a 5 year $350 million contract by 2027 with a no trade clause
VegetasHairline
Veteran
Delete