Was there any old civilization more advanced than Ancient Egypt??
- Thread starter Axolotl
- Start date
Yo Mama
...the sweeter the juice.
At the risk of being negged to death how many egyptians do you guys suppose were taken during the slave trade to the Americas?
Which areas were those slaves likely taken from and how come there arent more threads gushing about those areas.
I see a lot of wet panties on here about Egypt. Lol. Seems both white and black people are obsessed with Antient Egypt.
Was just wondering
.
I say take of those damp knickers off and dry your snatches and lets have the history buffs post more about any other areas of interest. And yes I read all the OP's on these topics, even Egypt from start to finish.
****
Just been called a fakkit by the Egyptian poster @mykey
Which areas were those slaves likely taken from and how come there arent more threads gushing about those areas.
I see a lot of wet panties on here about Egypt. Lol. Seems both white and black people are obsessed with Antient Egypt.
Was just wondering
.I say take of those damp knickers off and dry your snatches and lets have the history buffs post more about any other areas of interest. And yes I read all the OP's on these topics, even Egypt from start to finish.
****
Just been called a fakkit by the Egyptian poster @mykey
Last edited:
GetInTheTruck
Member
The oldest temple on Earth is goblekki teppe in modern day turkey. It predates the pyramida by like 6000 years.
UncleTomFord15
Veteran
GetInTheTruck
Member
Good point. The Egyptians were master architects but they were lacking in areas of philosophy, spirituality, government, etc; they were too materialistic and that contributed to the reason why their culture ended up being usurped.
They were no where near losers though.
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 44,031
- Reputation
- 8,069
- Daps
- 120,240
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Egyptian civilization was advanced because it was metropolitan and comprised of an enormous intermingling of pre-existing civilizations from Iraq to Macedonia to Ethiopia. It was New York before New York was even a dream.
So we really was kings?
Eternally Jaded
Superstar
I legit can't take you serious just off the strength of you saying the Greeks, Romans and Persians were contemporaries of AE(Ancient Egypt).
The height of the Greek City States and Kingdoms was way after AE became truly ancient.
And the Romans as we know them, ie the Hellenistic era was way after them, as known by how Rome venerated ancient Greece and took so much from them culturally.
AE is old as shyt breh.
AE was super old and on the decline when Xerxes, the King of Persia tried to take Greece.
Cleopatra, of the line of one of Alexander the Greats generals is closer to US in the timeline of human history than she is to AE.
Vikings?
Lol. Not disregarding what they did, but way closer to us than AE.
AE probably swallowed rival powers and absorbed them, as empires tend to do.
One of if not the oldest iconic civilization in the world, bar none.
Only China rivals and challenges.
I wish we could see who else moved and mattered at the time of their ascent tho. Cuz i def agree Africa likely had way more to offer history than just AE.
So what?
The pyramids are a precise instrument that gives you the exact dimensions of planet Earth..
face 'true' north.
They are in alignment with the constellations etc etc.
GetInTheTruck
Member
12,000 years ago humans were supposed to be hunter gatherers, they weren't supposed to be constructing megalithic structures and temples, but that's apparently what happened. That's way more impressive than the pyramids being being built only 5,000 years ago.
Also, most of the associations with the pyramids and constellations are exaggerated.
Most of what is called 'Ancient Egypt' was ruled by people native to that land.
You're talking about a 2,600 year period (From about 3,100 to 500 BC). Within that time, one dynasty was foreign (the Hyksos). They ruled for about a 100 years.
What Charlie Manson is talking about is the late period (around 500 BC onward) when first the Nubians, then the Assyrians, then the Persians ruled (25th - 29th dynasties). With the 30th dynasty, native Egyptians took it back for about 40 years (this was the last native Egyptian dynasty). Then started the Greeks, then Romans.
Again, for a good 2,600 years there was native rulers.
You're talking about a 2,600 year period (From about 3,100 to 500 BC). Within that time, one dynasty was foreign (the Hyksos). They ruled for about a 100 years.
What Charlie Manson is talking about is the late period (around 500 BC onward) when first the Nubians, then the Assyrians, then the Persians ruled (25th - 29th dynasties). With the 30th dynasty, native Egyptians took it back for about 40 years (this was the last native Egyptian dynasty). Then started the Greeks, then Romans.
Again, for a good 2,600 years there was native rulers.
Last edited:
They are not. You cannot exaggerate something like that.
Ever heard of Napta Playa? Then I suggest you look it up.
GetInTheTruck
Member
I have and Goblekki Teppe is still twice as old as that.
