Was King Tut Black or Arabic?

[Ultimate Warrior]

Breh could you imagine running up on a bytch in 2013 looking like Askia? bytches would be like "I'm giving that nikka the draws tonight "

***snorts 374seconds***

These 2013 harlots would think Askia, was down with kony and a terrorist.

 

[2Quik4UHoes]

fukk all them east african nikkas honestly

Westside is the best side

Don't disrespect your parents breh....

Edit: Jesus Christ I just went through this whole thread.

1. Tut was more than likely mixed, by the 18th dynasty Pharoahs had also been taking wives from other states. Tutmoses III who came well before Tut in the 18th was Egypt's most successful conqueror going from Egypt all the way to Persia in the East and Greece to the Northwest. I wanna say this was when Egypt's complexion began to lighten but Egypt was still majorily black for awhile after that. But, the rulers that came both before and especially after Tutmoses III would take wives from rival states to strenthen alligences. Not to mention, by the time Tut was born the dynasty had gotten into the bad habit of incest.

2. Egyptian civilization begins in Ethiopia. The Ancient Egyptians traced their religion, customs, sciences, and themselves to the land up the Nile in Ethiopia. So when you speak of Ethiopia this simply means Ethiopia was the land, within this land was different kingdoms. Nubia, Kush, Punt, etc. All the people of those lands were Ethiopians but under different rulers. Greeks called it Ethiopia since people were very dark, the name means "burned face". When you think about it scientifically it makes sense, the earliest homo sapiens sapiens(modern man), homo sapiens, etc have been found in the Rift Valley mainly in Ethiopia but also further down the Rift Valley in Kenya and Tanzania as well. So if this general area can be considered the starting point of humanity, how could it be farfetched that human society and civilization couldn't also be cultivated within this hub?

One thing to note tho. The word Ethiopian is a very general term in writings from antiquity to describe darker skinned people. Greeks had a habit of calling colored people that cuz of their fairer skin. For the sake of discussion this is strictly regarding the Nile Valley civilizations south of Ancient Egypt which is basically East Africa.

3. The reason why cacs always want to cover this up is because the Ancient Greeks basically plagiarized Egyptian sciences and teachings. All the great Greek minds went to Egypt to study, everything from Trigonometry to the Pythagorean Theorem was stolen from Egypt. So to fully acknowledge Egypt, and to a lesser extent Ethiopia, would be to re-write history as we know it. shyt would completely shatter this fake ass history we've been given.

4. We've been over this way too many times...

 

[bouncy]

Nikkas this is what their hair looked like. They wore hair hats too. One of the nikkas got that shape up. Draw your own conclusions.
http://www.reshafim.org.il/ad/egypt/timelines/topics/hair.htm

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

 

[D.C Young]

we're not talking language... at least im not. I'm saying he was probably more of middle eastern descent than black

you dont have to guess what he was...someone just posted up his DNA results

here it is again, in case you missed it

although he was mixed (not suprising since Ancient Egypt was already a few thousand years old at his time period), he was still overwhelmingly black

http://dnatribes.com/dnatribes-digest-2012-01-01.pdf

 

[Mowgli]

The Majority of you are simple as hell, and are honestly just taking up space. for most of you DEATH is the only mediator for your mental problems.

Even black people here hate themselves so much, they refuse to believe anyone of historical stature, just couldn't be black. Unless he was getting hit upside the head with watermelons, because he wanted to march for his rights to have sex with white women.

But Before I start my day, let me help you crooning gorillas just tad.


Do you believe in DNA? Do you believe in Genetics?


Do you walk like your father? Talk like your mother? Do you suck your thumb and realized your pops did too? Is @Mowgli son hairline going to be abysmal, granted that its his child?

If any of these answers are yes....Peep this hea:


What white man or smelly, brown toothed arab do YOU KNOW, would request to be buried with all his fly shyt? Who does that? Does the blockheaded, pant sagging, GMO Laced Soda drinking, Newport sucking, texting while driving, recording rap songs in his bathroom studio at 3am, Negro do that?







Close Thread.

fukk you and anybody that dap you fakkit.

 

[D.C Young]

This whole concept of the Pharaohs being African is crazy. They were Egyptian and just because Egypt is part of the continent doesnt mean they are part of the race color on that continent.
Egypt's start is a story of a mix of Arabs who found a beautiful stretch of land to fertilize and build an empire on. They aren't africans.
If anything Egypt is started with blood from other continents.

They were Black


"There is now a sufficient body of evidence from modern studies of skeletal remains to indicate that the ancient Egyptians, especially southern Egyptians, exhibited physical characteristics that are within the range of variation for ancient and modern indigenous peoples of the Sahara and tropical Africa.. In general, the inhabitants of Upper Egypt and Nubia had the greatest biological affinity to people of the Sahara and more southerly areas." (Nancy C. Lovell, " Egyptians, physical anthropology of," in Encyclopedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt, ed. Kathryn A. Bard and Steven Blake Shubert, ( London and New York: Routledge, 1999) pp 328-332)
and
"must be placed in the context of hypotheses informed by archaeological, linguistic, geographic and other data. In such contexts, the physical anthropological evidence indicates that early Nile Valley populations can be identified as part of an African lineage, but exhibiting local variation. This variation represents the short and long term effects of evolutionary forces, such as gene flow, genetic drift, and natural selection, influenced by culture and geography." ("Nancy C. Lovell, " Egyptians, physical anthropology of," in Encyclopedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt, ed. Kathryn A. Bard and Steven Blake Shubert, ( London and New York: Routledge, 1999). pp 328-332)

 

[Poitier]

Don't disrespect your parents breh....

Edit: Jesus Christ I just went through this whole thread.

1. Tut was more than likely mixed, by the 18th dynasty Pharoahs had also been taking wives from other states. Tutmoses III who came well before Tut in the 18th was Egypt's most successful conqueror going from Egypt all the way to Persia in the East and Greece to the Northwest. I wanna say this was when Egypt's complexion began to lighten but Egypt was still majorily black for awhile after that. But, the rulers that came both before and especially after Tutmoses III would take wives from rival states to strenthen alligences. Not to mention, by the time Tut was born the dynasty had gotten into the bad habit of incest.

You just dropped serious knowledge.

But, I kind of contend one point, was it just nobility taken wives from rival states? If it were just royalty taking wives how could have any kind of affect on the overall population?

The Greco-Roman stuff I always suspected and heard about but they never really tell you what went on in Egypt, whether it be Jesus, Socrates, etc

When you think about it, its so dumb like how did these Greek dudes know all of this scientific and mathematical theory but NEVER applied it, where as the Egyptians obviously needed math and science to build a Pyramids. They did the same thing with the Chinese and gun powder. AmerIndians and all of their math contributions and agricultural techniques. Shyt is crazy.

Africa is like an actual metaphor for Prometheus. Give human civilization it's foundation and in turn they put you in chains

 

[2Quik4UHoes]

Oh, and my theory of the chart is that the reason why the DNA traces further south is because those groups experience less admixture from the Horn of Africa which is closer but has a population that's been exposed to many groups from the Mediterranean to South Asia. Basically, Tut wasn't as mixed as groups that would've once been considered sources for Tut's line, imo.

 

[Poitier]

 

[2Quik4UHoes]

You just dropped serious knowledge.

But, I kind of contend one point, was it just nobility taken wives from rival states? If it were just royalty taking wives how could have any kind of affect on the overall population?

The Greco-Roman stuff I always suspected and heard about but they never really tell you what went on in Egypt, whether it be Jesus, Socrates, etc

When you think about it, its so dumb like how did these Greek dudes know all of this scientific and mathematical theory but NEVER applied it, where as the Egyptians obviously needed math and science to build a Pyramids. They did the same thing with the Chinese and gun powder. AmerIndians and all of their math contributions and agricultural techniques. Shyt is crazy.

Africa is like an actual metaphor for Prometheus. Give human civilization it's foundation and in turn they put you in chains

As far as I know it's just royalty that was involved in this. It was just Pharoahs taking wives, no Egyptian princesses were given in such a manner which was a way of presenting Egypt's dominance and validity for their empire. Even during the Ptolemies the Black Egyptians were still around in numbers, but I'd say this was really when the mixing began since the Hellenistic era connected places that hadn't been connected since Egypt's peak except it was now in reverse. Basically the further away from those dominant dynasties you get the lighter the complexion gets as more nations come to conquer Egypt. It was the downside of being who they were, by transmitting their civilization and culture far and wide it made Egypt a target cuz anyone that could subdue her would enjoy great glory and prestige. Not to mention, even after the fall of the Pharaonic dynasties the teachings still went on. Many of our religions began with all those teachings in Egypt, just about everything traces right back there from the first monotheistic religion to the idea of a messiah.

But yeah, it's pretty funny when you think about it. Egyptians were charting far off stars like Sirius, coming up with complex equations and formulas, but let cacs tell it some aliens did that.

 

[pickles]

you dont have to guess what he was...someone just posted up his DNA results

here it is again, in case you missed it

although he was mixed (not suprising since Ancient Egypt was already a few thousand years old at his time period), he was still overwhelmingly black

http://dnatribes.com/dnatribes-digest-2012-01-01.pdf

The top 4 is overwhelmingly African and you still consider him "mixed"? Also the last four should not count, because them tombs have been raided since the beginning of time. All those cacs dropping their DNA in there. Back in the day, they were not wearing no surgical gloves, being careful and shyt.

Why is it so hard to believe they were black? They probably looked like modern day Eritrean people.

 

[aRoMaN21]

At the end of the day: The white man is the DEVIL and the father of LIES.

@aRoMaN21 , shesau, proves this.



CynicalAfrikan.com <<<<< Another history website.

it says you edited

Last edited: Yesterday at 8:17 PM

what did you edit out

Im done.

i told you i was reminded of what i forgot.


postsome more propaganda that has nothing to do with the convo.

 

[aRoMaN21]

The top 4 is overwhelmingly African and you still consider him "mixed"? Also the last four should not count, because them tombs have been raided since the beginning of time. All those cacs dropping their DNA in there. Back in the day, they were not wearing no surgical gloves, being careful and shyt.

Why is it so hard to believe they were black? They probably looked like modern day Eritrean people.

and arent modern day eritrean people mixed and are diluted africans?
those facial characteristics arent what an african would look like in 5000bc

 

[observe]

Don't disrespect your parents breh....

Edit: Jesus Christ I just went through this whole thread.

1. Tut was more than likely mixed, by the 18th dynasty Pharoahs had also been taking wives from other states. Tutmoses III who came well before Tut in the 18th was Egypt's most successful conqueror going from Egypt all the way to Persia in the East and Greece to the Northwest. I wanna say this was when Egypt's complexion began to lighten but Egypt was still majorily black for awhile after that. But, the rulers that came both before and especially after Tutmoses III would take wives from rival states to strenthen alligences. Not to mention, by the time Tut was born the dynasty had gotten into the bad habit of incest.

2. Egyptian civilization begins in Ethiopia. The Ancient Egyptians traced their religion, customs, sciences, and themselves to the land up the Nile in Ethiopia. So when you speak of Ethiopia this simply means Ethiopia was the land, within this land was different kingdoms. Nubia, Kush, Punt, etc. All the people of those lands were Ethiopians but under different rulers. Greeks called it Ethiopia since people were very dark, the name means "burned face". When you think about it scientifically it makes sense, the earliest homo sapiens sapiens(modern man), homo sapiens, etc have been found in the Rift Valley mainly in Ethiopia but also further down the Rift Valley in Kenya and Tanzania as well. So if this general area can be considered the starting point of humanity, how could it be farfetched that human society and civilization couldn't also be cultivated within this hub?

One thing to note tho. The word Ethiopian is a very general term in writings from antiquity to describe darker skinned people. Greeks had a habit of calling colored people that cuz of their fairer skin. For the sake of discussion this is strictly regarding the Nile Valley civilizations south of Ancient Egypt which is basically East Africa.

3. The reason why cacs always want to cover this up is because the Ancient Greeks basically plagiarized Egyptian sciences and teachings. All the great Greek minds went to Egypt to study, everything from Trigonometry to the Pythagorean Theorem was stolen from Egypt. So to fully acknowledge Egypt, and to a lesser extent Ethiopia, would be to re-write history as we know it. shyt would completely shatter this fake ass history we've been given.

4. We've been over this way too many times...

They never did incest..that was in Europe..Egyptian royalty married their sisters so they could preserve the lineage..but they didnt sleep with them or sleep in the same room with them..

 

[Dzali OG]

and arent modern day eritrean people mixed and are diluted africans?
those facial characteristics arent what an african would look like in 5000bc

Well there's your problem...htf you know exactly what africans looked like in 5000bc?

Actually we all have it a little twisted because we refuse to know that the nature of man hasn't changed...WE BE FUKKIN BREHS! We were fukkin way back then too. Had nikkas same as we do now who loved cacs or exotic looking women.

Egypt was a BLACK countrywhich was also multi-cultural. Persian and Greek and European women probably were gettin piped and the offspring gaining prominence. Just use America as an example except it were a black country.

All that arguing about them being arabs....what you think arabs are? The descendents of nikkas dikkin asians and euros!

So it all comes back to if they weren't white they were black or the descendents of blacks. All arabs are, are the results of african nikkas pipin exotic women same as we do now!