Simple, ask yourself if Vito would have done the same thing. Vito was the last person Michael ever respected/revered/took advice from. I'm not even talking the father son angle; do you think Vito would have killed his blood brother? I think not.
If his blood brother set him up to be killed. Fredo betrayed Michael with Mo Green and Mike warned him not to ever do it again. Never go against the family. The attempted hit on Mike at his house was Fredo. Fredo had to die.Simple, ask yourself if Vito would have done the same thing. Vito was the last person Michael ever respected/revered/took advice from. I'm not even talking the father son angle; do you think Vito would have killed his blood brother? I think not.
He could have gotten Fredo out of the picture without having him killed.
He could have given Fredo the life he almost had in Italy.
He didn't have to kill Fredo, but he was a psycho and I'm sure his time in war fukked his head up.
WrongWrong. Death is permanent. He could’ve had Fredo sent overseas and told him to never return. He could’ve sent him to London, Spain, Italy, maybe somewhere in South America like Argentina or Brazil. Tons of places for him to disappear to and not be a bother anymore and then years later once tensions cooled you could’ve had a reconciliation.
But he was SMAHT and could do things!!!nikka was frail and a liability
Yea..should've banished his ass to Brazil or some shyt.No. But he did lie and deceive him. And was indirectly responsible for the attempt on his life. But even Michael regretted having Fredo killed as referenced in Part 3
Wrong
He was a tool for Michaels enemies, as long as he was alive the more vulnerable he was.
These crooks can find anybody, hey fredo testify against your brother and you’ll be The Godfather
That already worked before
Michael was paranoid as fukk..no. simply no justification for it. Michael was feeling himself too much.
True..This is always a great discussion, and a complex one. Michael was right to kill Fredo, because he was a liability and a traitor, you can't really come back from that. Though, I did see the family betrayal handled well in Boardwalk Empire, with Nucky and his brother. In that show, Nucky didn't kill his brother, which was wise for awhile. Can't remember if Nucky's bro betrayed him again later in the series or not.
Vito would've never condoned Michael killing Fredo, nor would he have killed his brother. Because Vito believed in family over everything. Michael was more ruthless than Vito, and much less sentimental about family.
Did Fredo try it again? Fredo didn't even think it was gonna go that way in the first place. Vito would have exiled him to Italy, where he could get all the bytches he wanted off his name and never have power.If his blood brother set him up to be killed. Fredo betrayed Michael with Mo Green and Mike warned him not to ever do it again. Never go against the family. The attempted hit on Mike at his house was Fredo. Fredo had to die.
Fredo would NEVER go against his father...simple.Did Fredo try it again? Fredo didn't even think it was gonna go that way in the first place. Vito would have exiled him to Italy, where he could get all the bytches he wanted off his name and never have power.
Did Fredo try it again? Fredo didn't even think it was gonna go that way in the first place. Vito would have exiled him to Italy, where he could get all the bytches he wanted off his name and never have power.
Once u go against your own family, u deserve to die. Fredo was weak and a liability. Michael took the family to a new level.Fredo would NEVER go against his father...simple.