You don't understand, I agree with that but, WHY? In nature the things that we are sexually attracted to, are things that enhance our species to live a better life. Why would we become attracted to something different that makes your life harder. Because white skin isn't a good barrier to the sun, skin cancer is almost inevitable (not now, but back then it would have been), even in northern climates, sickness such as kidney stones because having little active vitamin d in your bloodstream makes it hard for your body to process and make use of the calcium, so it collects in the kidneys, and you get kidney stones. Kidney stones is high in whites because of all the milk they drink, and having less active vitamin d.Sexual selection sexual selection sexual selection.
If you keep mating lighter haired people with other lighter haired people. You will eventually get some lighter hair.
And it would make no sense for an African featured person living in north europe in pre historic times. . He would die just a lil faster than a cac from hypothermia because of lanky extremities that let off a lot of heat. It's perfect for Hot climates like Africa but not other places.
But these genes are all in the human genome. Blond ism, black skin, freckles, it's just recessive and not showing. Or in other cases maybe dominant because 2 black haired parents , and they suddenly have a brunette haired kid, because there were people in their families that had the brunette recessive gene. Then put together brunette can become dominant.
I agree being lanky isn't good for the climate but, that means they would have become more stocky to conserve heat.
Again, I'm not writing all of this to say whites are the devil or anything like that, I look at them as the new kid in this family but, what I want to know is why is he so different, and go against the theory of evolution, survival of the fittest.