Dr. Sebi Jr.
Trust Me
HOW can you trust this obvious imposter Jew CAC name? Zondervan? Zimmerman? COINCIDENCE? I'm EMPHATICALLY sure his demonic scrolls lie about the BLACKNESS of Humphrey Bogart.Zondervan
HOW can you trust this obvious imposter Jew CAC name? Zondervan? Zimmerman? COINCIDENCE? I'm EMPHATICALLY sure his demonic scrolls lie about the BLACKNESS of Humphrey Bogart.Zondervan
HOW can you trust this obvious imposter Jew CAC name? Zondervan? Zimmerman? COINCIDENCE? I'm EMPHATICALLY sure his demonic scrolls lie about the BLACKNESS of Humphrey Bogart.
You're right, Humphrey Bogart WAS Black.
I understand what you're saying, but I don't agree. If this were truly the case, why was it only Negroes sold, and not the Hamites?
The Africans knew who they were giving up. It doesn't even really make sense to say that Africans sold Africans. Why would these other nations even negotiate? They would just simply take anyone they choose by force. Again, they worked with the Arabs and the white man to sell Negroes.
HOW can you trust this obvious imposter Jew CAC name? Zondervan? Zimmerman? COINCIDENCE? I'm EMPHATICALLY sure his demonic scrolls lie about the BLACKNESS of Humphrey Bogart.
A lot of times in West and Central African societies the only people who were somewhat literate where the royal families. The masses weren't....they mostly were farmers and to a lesser degree fishers (for those tribes close to the coast) that did substinance (spelling) farming and lived an agrarian life. We are a sedentary people and that is one of the reasons it was easier to enslave us as opposed to other Africans who were pastoralists nomads always on the move.
I did and my mothers lineage traces back to the Americas, not AfricaTake a DNA test.
Well, what is an 'African?' Is it someone who has citizenship in Africa, or one whose ancestors are indigenous to that land? I'm going to assume it's the latter, so that's what we'll deal with. Biblically, no you can't be a Jew (descendant of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob-Shemetic) and also be what today would be considered African because Africans are descendants from Ham. The Negro in America has been told that we are African because we were taken from the west coast of Africa, and we have physical similarities with Hamitic people (Africans). That however, doesn't make it true. From Zondervan's Bible Dictionary-
"Zondervan's Compact Bible Dictionary: Ham - The youngest son of Noah, born probably about 96 years before the Flood; and one of eight persons to live through the Flood. He became the progenitor of the dark races; not the Negroes, but the Egyptians, Ethiopians, Libyans and Canaanites."
Why would they make this distinction? It's because they know that Negroes and Africans are not the same people. No, we shouldn't identify ourselves with African because they aren't our people. A lot of Africans don't identify with Negroes. Why is that? The Negro was the one who was dispersed during the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, not the African. Africans probably dispersed some through voluntary migration, but it wasn't due to the slave trade. While I understand why people look at Africa in great regards due to its rich history and land, it's not the Motherland as people would have us to believe. The Bible tells us differently
Galatians 4:26
26But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.
While I can understand what you're getting at, I find it hard to believe that in ancient Africa, where the beasts of the fields were even more plentiful than they are now, that West Africans could even be called sedentary regardless of their lifestyle choices regarding the majority of their food gathering. While they may not have been the warrior tribes you speak of, they still would have to be pretty adept in handling themselves and protecting their tribes. Millions of people were taken and I seriously doubt the foreign invaders had the types of numbers to pull that off, unless there was more to the story. Let me ask you a few questions though-Do you follow the Bible? Judging off just physical characteristics, do you think there is a difference between so called African Americans and West Africans today?
Coastal West Africans were most definitely sedentary
but moving on
of course. You guys are a essentially a mixed race group of people so your not going to look like us. But you guys have our DNA and not the other way around. I read in genetic studies that 7.7% of American males have E1B1A (a West African Niger-Congolese paternal marker).
I did and my mothers lineage traces back to the Americas, not Africa
Mixed race with who? And why would we have YOUR DNA, and 'not the other way around'? You said earlier we are West African and y'all are also West African. There shouldn't be a difference.
"African-Americans" have significant amounts of non-African DNA.
You have our DNA and not the other way around because although you guys descend from us you also have taken on genetic input from other groups due to race mixing with Europeans, Latinos, American Indians, etc.
You guys are not the same people that got off those slave ships. Your essentially a new group of people.