not juelzing. I'm challenging you to think it out practically. generalizing and vague allusions are for beefing when you asked people doing that t
o specify who they gonna charge they left the discussion. that's literally what happened in here... you wanna have a grounded discussion then keep it practical. i don't need to shift the negative that's what the British did not me. the discussion is showing it is impractical to do as they suggest. now if THIS is a thing to make FBA "not fukk with the continent it's an excuse" because
"the continent" is not collectively responsible for Atlantic slavery and this is the actual point. you'd have a hard time sourcing the culprits so the easy and lazy thing to do is BLAME AFRICANS.
For example you say "charge an ethnicity" let's explore how practical that is... how are you going to identify these tribes by name or dna? in theory Africans themselve get tested nobody is going to be purely just one ethnicity. they will have dominant genetics from one tribe maybe but not all. So what do you do then? say if you are more than 70% _____ ethnicity you are responsible for reparations? Or if you are from this part of the country or speak this language or have this lineage. like how they gonna identify these people who will pay. who do you chare is a valid question not a juelz.
Brits want brehs chasing their tail as a distraction from bringing valid cases to them. and it works because there is already bad blood easy shyt.
manipulated divided and mentally conquered. that's some of us today. it's only gonna get worse. you don't need cointelpro today just the internet a few c00n agents and a lot of misdirection and we end up where we are now.