TRUSTED SONY SERGEANT FATBOI EXPOSES SATANIC XBOT PLAN TO MANIPULATE PUBLIC OPINION: DISGUSTING

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,244
Reputation
3,295
Daps
53,237
Reppin
CALI
Get the fukk out of here ...


Everything in that clip is real??? Like you can explore the streets??????
Yeah it's real but the game has unrealistic goals and will never be completed.

They want to create 100 different universes with fully explorable planets with realistic ecosystems.

The game was been in development for YEARS and they only have a portion of one planet and a few moons. They aren't even close to finished with one universe and the want 100.

:mjlol:
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
60,157
Reputation
7,898
Daps
110,167
Oh look an ex-ND dev literally says the Digital Foundry guy (Dictator) is quite wrong.



Those guys are good sometimes but there's times they're off the mark. It's not good to put 100% stock into what they say. They're not dumb but they're not literally this infallible authority on tech breakdown. Dictator from what I've read seems to be more of a PC guy while John and the other guy I forget seems to be slightly more neutral. Dictator just comes off as a guy who don't like consoles. His comments often times sounds definitive and gets circulated as facts and ends up being shot down by actual devs.
 
Last edited:

Koba St

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
22,415
Reputation
5,927
Daps
156,285
Digital Foundry are not game developers yet somehow people believe them over people who actually develop games for a career :mjlol:

I like their work and I don’t think they’re biased against or for any company but let’s put things in perspective here; they’re not in the game development industry and to actually believe them over Mark Cerny who’s a genius engineer is just pure fanboyism.
 

The Mad Titan

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
48,920
Reputation
12,785
Daps
127,302
Oh look an ex-ND dev literally says the Digital Foundry guy (Dictator) is quite wrong.



Those guys are good sometimes but there's times they're off the mark. It's not good to put 100% stock into what they say. They're not dumb but they're not literally this infallible authority on tech breakdown. Dictator from what I've read seems to be more of a PC guy while John and the other guy I forget seems to be slightly more neutral. Dictator just comes off as a guy who don't like consoles. His comments often times sounds definitive and gets circulated as facts and ends up being shot down by actual devs.



This tells me just what I thought, ps5 1st party games will look great, as good as xbx1 games if not better than most the multi plats.


But multi plat games are probably gonna look better on xbx1 and if a 1st party studio really gets to shine there titles will look better than anything the ps5 can drop



Can I get another infamous? I'd be tempted to get a ps5 at launch for that
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
60,157
Reputation
7,898
Daps
110,167
This tells me just what I thought, ps5 1st party games will look great, as good as xbx1 games if not better than most the multi plats.


But multi plat games are probably gonna look better on xbx1 and if a 1st party studio really gets to shine there titles will look better than anything the ps5 can drop



Can I get another infamous? I'd be tempted to get a ps5 at launch for that
I assume you mean XSX but again this whole "but multiplat games will look better" needs context.
They will look virtually identical. The Ps5 is way past capable of doing 4K/60fps for many games as 4K rendering was already possible with current gen consoles for certain games. The resolution/framerate will be virtually identical to the naked eye.
If both games are running at the same res/fps, the graphical details even if compared are HARDLY better looking sometimes between medium/high or ultra.

I'm going to for example, take several screenshots of games I have right now on PC and take some high res screens, upload them here and want you to tell me which setting is what.
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
60,157
Reputation
7,898
Daps
110,167
Act like Cerny is above bias and possible lies, brehs:francis:


Act like Cerny wasn't Juelzing hard in that presentation, brehs:francis:
This is just pure conjecture based off of not really knowing what the tech is talking about. saying the system architect was "jeulzing" in a presentation intended for developers is funny. What exactly would there be to "juelz" about? This idea that the system lead architect has to lie is weird. I take it that you don't believe Phil Spencer or MSFT ever lies right?
 

Mountain

All Star
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
4,121
Reputation
730
Daps
8,671
Reppin
more money
I assume you mean XSX but again this whole "but multiplat games will look better" needs context.
They will look virtually identical. The Ps5 is way past capable of doing 4K/60fps for many games as 4K rendering was already possible with current gen consoles for certain games. The resolution/framerate will be virtually identical to the naked eye.
If both games are running at the same res/fps, the graphical details even if compared are HARDLY better looking sometimes between medium/high or ultra.

I'm going to for example, take several screenshots of games I have right now on PC and take some high res screens, upload them here and want you to tell me which setting is what.

But they will indeed "look better" on it. Whether or not its much of a difference is subjective.
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
60,157
Reputation
7,898
Daps
110,167
But they will indeed "look better" on it. Whether or not its much of a difference is subjective.
If someone is talking about one thing looking better than another, the difference had better be easily noticeable to the naked eye. Beyond that and now it just seems like splitting hairs and waiting for someone to dissect it to find a difference.

Like this is what people are arguing about in visual "differences"

One of these images I put the setting on the next higher setting so "technically" it's better but is that even noticeable to most people?

jRpTq2.png


jRptPo.png

Especially when played on a 4K screen from a few feet away? I know what the difference is but it's so negligible especially in real time when playing.

Like I put one setting higher than the other and I swear to you the difference is SO tiny that if someone were to base their entire purchase on something as small as this and not their controller/system os etc preference I'd say that person has issues lol.


jRpC65.png

jRpJzz.png

jRp9tb.png

jRpdK7.png



This is a still picture too. Nobody is standing still in a game like this staring at the wall to discern graphical differences. There's settings that make big changes like going from no anti-aliasing to something like Filmic SMAA or turning on motion blur or even very high vs high textures sometimes but really the differences will result in practically the same resolution/performance and probably even settings for the most part. But yeah this is the "difference" people are bickering about.
 
Last edited:

TripleAgent

FBA. ZayK
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
34,685
Reputation
4,929
Daps
86,967
Reppin
Baltimore
This is just pure conjecture based off of not really knowing what the tech is talking about. saying the system architect was "jeulzing" in a presentation intended for developers is funny. What exactly would there be to "juelz" about? This idea that the system lead architect has to lie is weird. I take it that you don't believe Phil Spencer or MSFT ever lies right?
He was Juelzing about the TFLOPS, as well as the delta in power between the systems. I don't expect you to admit it, but he was shaky as hell.

And they all BS and lie. They're all corporate cacs
 
Top