Trump removes Federal Government diversity/sensitivity trainings on white privilege & racist history

G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman

Logic Is Absent Wherever Hate Is Present
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
79,940
Reputation
5,705
Daps
234,983
The type of posters who attack you are suspect themselves I have come to see
Only Trump supporters and vote dissuaders on here have a problem with me. You won't find a solid poster that has an issue with me. Judge a man by his opposers...if the devil hates you that means you gotta be doing something righteous :manny:
 

Kyle C. Barker

Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
27,983
Reputation
9,303
Daps
120,099
These types of "trainings" not only run counter to the fundamental beliefs for which our
Nation has stood since its inception,
but they also engender division and resentment within the
Federal workforce. We can be proud that as an employer, the Federal government has
employees of all races, ethnicities, and religions.

:comeon:
 

BaggerofTea

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Messages
49,698
Reputation
-2,427
Daps
240,599
Critical race theory - Wikipedia


Major themes[edit]
Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic have documented the following major themes as characteristic of work in critical race theory:

  • Critique of liberalism: CRT scholars favor a more aggressive approach to social transformation, as opposed to liberalism's more cautious approach;[citation needed] a race-conscious approach to transformation rejecting liberal embrace of affirmative action, color blindness, role modeling, or the merit principle;[21] and an approach that relies more on political organizing, in contrast to liberalism's reliance on rights-based remedies.[citation needed]
  • Storytelling, counter-storytelling, and "naming one's own reality": The use of narrative to illuminate and explore experiences of racial oppression.[22] Bryan Brayboy has emphasized the epistemic importance of storytelling in Indigenous-American communities as superseding that of theory, and has proposed a Tribal Critical Race Theory (TribCrit).[23]
  • Revisionist interpretations of American civil rights law and progress: Criticism of civil-rights scholarship and anti-discrimination law, such as Brown v. Board of Education. Derrick Bell, one of CRT's founders, argued that civil rights advances for blacks coincided with the self-interest of white elitists. Likewise, after performing extensive archival research in the U.S. Department of State and Department of Justice, as well as in the correspondence by U.S. ambassadors abroad, Mary L. Dudziak found that the passing of U.S. laws was not because people of color were discriminated against. Rather, such was only to improve the image of the United States to third-world countries that the US needed as allies during the Cold War.[24]
  • Applying insights from social science writing on race and racism to legal problems.[22]
  • Intersectional theory: The examination of race, sex, class, national origin, and sexual orientation, and how their combination plays out in various settings, e.g., how the needs of a Latina female are different from those of a black male and whose needs are the ones promoted.[25]
  • Essentialism: Reducing the experience of a category (gender or race) to the experience of one sub-group (white women or African-Americans). In essence, all oppressed people share the commonality of oppression. However, such oppression varies by gender, class, race, etc., and therefore, the aims and strategies will differ for each of these groups.[26]
  • Non-white cultural nationalism and separatism (incl. Black nationalism): The exploration of more radical views that argue for separation and reparations as a form of foreign aid.[22]
  • Legal institutions, critical pedagogy, and minority lawyers in the bar.[22]
  • Structural determinism: Exploration of how "the structure of legal thought or culture influences its content," whereby a particular mode of thought or widely-shared practice determines significant social outcomes, usually occurring without conscious knowledge. As such, theorists posit that our system cannot redress certain kinds of wrongs.[27]
  • White privilege: Belief in the notion of a myriad of social advantages, benefits, and courtesies that come with being a member of the dominant race (i.e. white people). A clerk not following you around in a store or not having people cross the street at night to avoid you, are two examples of white privilege.[28]
  • Microaggression: Belief in the notion that sudden, stunning, or dispiriting transactions have the power to mar the everyday of oppressed individuals. These include small acts of racism consciously or unconsciously perpetrated, whereby an analogy could be that of water dripping on a rock wearing away at it slowly. Microaggressions are based on the assumptions about racial matters that are absorbed from cultural heritage.[29]
  • Empathetic fallacy: Believing that one can change a narrative by offering an alternative narrative in hopes that the listener's empathy will quickly and reliably take over. Empathy is not enough to change racism as most people are not exposed to many people different from themselves and people mostly seek out information about their own culture and group.[30]
 

Fillerguy

Veteran
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
18,558
Reputation
4,195
Daps
77,294
Reppin
North Jersey
Fascism. He's attempting to force ultra-nationlist rhethoric in our schools. Fascists seek to stamp out government descent by regulating social culture.

You fukks allowed a white supremacist fascist to control the most powerful nation in history. You gave him the control over Judiciary branch for at least a generation.:francis:
 

Unknown Poster

I had to do it to em.
Supporter
Joined
Aug 28, 2015
Messages
53,151
Reputation
27,301
Daps
284,409
Reppin
SOHH Class of 2006
Trump puts an end to anti-racism training in federal agencies —
calling it ‘un-American propaganda’

Published

2 hours ago
on

September 5, 2020
By

Agence France-Presse

Cat have loose stools? This nutrition promotes healthy stool in as little as 24 hours.
SPONSORED BY HILL'S PET


SEE MORE


The White House said in a statement that “according to press reports, employees across the Executive Branch have been required to attend trainings where they are told that ‘virtually all White people contribute to racism’ or where they are required to say that they ‘benefit from racism.'”

Defend democracy. Click to invest in courageous progressive journalism today.


The White House Office of Management and Budget said it had been ordered to “ensure that Federal agencies cease and desist from using taxpayer dollars to fund these divisive, un-American propaganda training sessions.”

Protests in major US cities erupted after the death of African American George Floyd in May at the hands of a white police officer in Minneapolis.

Trump — who is pressing a tough law and order line in the run-up to November’s elections — has blasted such demonstrators as violent anarchists.

This week the US president visited Kenosha, Wisconsin, where African American Jacob Blake was shot in the back repeatedly by a white policeman and left paralyzed from the waist down.


ADVERTISING

Trump did not meet with or speak to the man’s family during the visit, instead meeting with law enforcement officials and viewing damage from protests triggered by the shooting.

© 2020 AFP

Trump puts an end to anti-racism training in federal agencies — calling it ‘un-American propaganda’
 
Top