That's what sung the election in 2016.So even with 0% of the black vote the poll was even. That lets you know who really swings elections
White women.
That's what sung the election in 2016.So even with 0% of the black vote the poll was even. That lets you know who really swings elections
White women.
He’s gonna get at least 10 percent of the Black vote. We already had a Black president, so there’s not much excitement about that part from a lot of us with Kamala. Combine that with the way a lot of people feel about the democratic party after the Obama presidency, there are gonna be a lot of people who won’t vote at all or will vote for an independent. The numbers will definitely be interesting.
90%?!?! nikka what?!?!
aint gonna be no ban bet bytch.. aint gonna be no 90% either!!!!
90% of the black vote with NO BLACK AGENDA????!! you smoking crack???
This dusty c00n stay saying dumb shyt
Obama got 95% and 93% of the Black vote in 2008 and 2012 respectively and this idiot is about to bust a blood vessel screaming about how impossible this is.
Then was THEN...
THIS is now... things have changed you dnc dikkrider...
Looking bad. I know some Trump supporting black people who have now switch to #both sidesSample size is probably too small. He'll definitely get some votes.
This dusty c00n stay saying dumb shyt
Obama got 95% and 93% of the Black vote in 2008 and 2012 respectively and this idiot is about to bust a blood vessel screaming about how impossible this is.
According to your entire posting history, Democrats are the same as they've always been.
Seriously, what's the difference between them and now?
We''l find out in november... good luck bruh...
2012 to 2024 and he thinks the black vote gonna come out 90%?!?! for her???
America not decided on popular vote... you keep forgetting that
You didn't answer my question.
Even Biden got 87% of the Black vote in 2020, why is it so eye-popping that Kamala would get 90% (which is pretty normal for Dem candidates)?
The difference between then and now is people see through copmala harris and she's not getting that black male vote... secondly she's not getting that MASS WW vote either...
so good luck in november...
Let's keep in mind that once again, you're rushing into a thread about Trump and bashing Democrats.
Curious how you're "both sides" but your anger is clearly levied more at Democrats than Rethugs.
With what money? We have the least wealth, we will always be outbid. AIPAC and corporations run these politicians.If Black folks are truly gonna "both sides" - and try to get concessions out of the white parties - they need a Michelle Obama type figure that is strong enough to say
"KAMALA, unless you come widdit, we staying home"
But the "both sides" camp is politically stupid, and doesn't know how to create someone that
1) Dems fear
2) Repubs fear
3) Black people respect
It's all online BS, never grass roots organizing.
And if a "Black Party" could ever truly organize and decide tight elections - a lot of what we want to get out of the Feds/State/City could get solved without them, imo.
DNC keeps rigging primaries, and both main parties conspire to sabotage 3rd party candidates. If shyt was fair, Sanders would probably have been the Dem candidate once or twice. Reparations would be a bigger issue also. Williamson and West would have spread the message. They were quashed.Trying to "both sides" a general election is stupid because Republicans are never going to do anything that specifically benefits black people and don't care if black people don't vote (in fact, it benefits them). So threatening to sit out those elections is just going to get more people like Trump in office.
Bothsiders would be better off trying to swing Dem primaries toward more pro-black candidates.
But they don't, because they're mostly disingenuous conservatives trying to swing elections towards the GOP.
Harris isn't half the politician Obama wasAccording to your entire posting history, Democrats are the same as they've always been.
Seriously, what's the difference between them and now?