Trump announces tariffs ranging from 10% to 49% for dozens of countries

Sir Richard Spirit

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
5,955
Reputation
736
Daps
19,038
That's one of my goals by the end of the summer. Told my dad to get whatever cash he gets to pay his couple cards off.



Last summer, I borrowed $5500 from my credit union and paid off the remainder of my debt. In Jan, I got $11,000 for my wife to pay off her credit cards. She wanted my to dip into my savings and try to tap my 4013b. She didn’t understand why I would borrow. Had to tell her dumbass, if I lose my job I’ll still have my savings. The credit union will be fukked.
 

3rdWorld

Veteran
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
46,157
Reputation
4,234
Daps
135,366
I'm not goin lie..

Any time I traveled throughout the world.

You never see American products..

Definitely don't see American cars and shyt..

And if you DO say.. I want some frosted flake in random 3rd world county the shyt is like 18 usd..

So learning these countries have such high tariffs on the US was mind blowing..

And knowing we only had a 2% tariff on some of those same countries is wild.

Those tarrifs are paid by the local poor, America isn't affected.
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
25,050
Reputation
4,134
Daps
112,030
Reppin
Detroit
That's one of my goals by the end of the summer. Told my dad to get whatever cash he gets to pay his couple cards off.

Only have one Credit Card myself with like 2K on it :patrice: I'm wondering if I should just go ahead and pay that off

Been paying the minimum for years but I have the cash, might be time to just say fukk it and pay it off.
 

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
20,031
Reputation
5,141
Daps
86,487
Reppin
The Arsenal
Only have one Credit Card myself with like 2K on it :patrice: I'm wondering if I should just go ahead and pay that off

Been paying the minimum for years but I have the cash, might be time to just say fukk it and pay it off.
you're carrying a balance of $2k and paying the min for years? i mean damn you didn't have to pay the balance off in full, but you should have at least been paying $150 a month and pay it off in 14-15 months. or better yet balance transfer it to a card offering interest free for 18 months.
 

Kyle C. Barker

Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
28,200
Reputation
9,484
Daps
121,302
Have yall bought stocks or holding ?


I bought uvxy as an extremely short term play. But you gotta watch that shyt. I am nowhere near an expert and it's not even my field but it goes up whenever Trump does something extremely stupid ie the way he handled the pandemic in 2020.
 

Vandelay

Life is absurd. Lean into it.
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
24,968
Reputation
6,679
Daps
89,667
Reppin
Phi Chi Connection
Great video, released today:



Step 1: Tariff Chaos (current step)
- Don’t care about economy tanking or stock market crashing. A lot of tariffs to create negotiating leverage with other countries. For the rest of the plan.
Step 2: Reciprocal Tariffs
- Countries who import from other countries like China then sell to us, won’t find it profitable anymore because of tariffs from Step 1.
Step 3: a Mar-a-Lago accord (hypothesis: weaken the dollar while at the same time keeping it as the world currency)
- Countries opt in to an agreement with the U.S for their currency to back the dollar so that if the dollar strengthens the countries will pick up for it in return for military protection and consumer market.

This really sounds like the MAGA plan.

We’re screwed. Nobody trusts us. If it’s anything like what we showed the Ukraine, why would a country think we won’t switch up on them every few four years? Turning back on allies economically as well.

shyt, imagine paying all that money for U.S military protection all for us to walk it back or for another country to come out with game changer tech.

It’ll most likely end how the video states: relying on other countries (Mexico, Japan, etc.) for their manufacturing.

The Fart of the Deal.

I been saying this for a few years now as MAGA and adjacents have been floating something similar for years.

Trust is the most important thing, and we broke it.

It MAY HAVE worked if we had a completely vertically integrated supply chain, because we could say you know what, we do this already we don't need you. MAGA thinks you can do this and it's business as usual. The collective world is gonna tell us to kiss our ass as key links in our supply chain become undone. Suddenly we can't make a complete airplane or a battery...
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
62,860
Reputation
9,548
Daps
172,117

Trump’s new tariff math looks a lot like ChatGPT’s​


When President Donald Trump began yesterday’s announcement of the White House’s latest trade policy brandishing a novelty-sized cardboard sign labeled “Reciprocal Tariffs,” the immediate and nearly unanimous response was bafflement. Trump slapped a 10 percent baseline tariff on all imports into the US, including from uninhabited islands , plus absurdly high rates on specific countries, supposedly based on “tariffs charged to the USA” — which didn’t match up to other, non-cardboard-sign-based estimates. Stock markets have plummeted and consumers are facing down sharp price hikes on potentially almost everything they buy.

Where did these numbers come from? Apparently, an oversimplified calculation that several major AI chatbots happen to recommend.

Economist James Surowiecki quickly reverse-engineered a possible explanation for the tariff pricing. He found you could recreate each of the White House’s numbers by simply taking a given country’s trade deficit with the US and dividing it by their total exports to the US. Halve that number, and you get a ready-to-use “discounted reciprocal tariff.” The White House objected to this claim and published the formula it says that it used, but as Politico points out , the formula looks like a dressed-up version of Surowiecki’s method.

In case you weren’t sure, Surowiecki calls this approach “extraordinary nonsense.” So why did Trump’s team use it? Well, like plenty of people who’ve realized their homework is due in three hours’ time , it seems like they may have been tempted by AI.

Screenshot-2025-04-03-at-14.37.07.png

Caption: Here’s how ChatGPT suggests handling a trade deficit.
Source: OpenAI

Screenshot-2025-04-03-at-9.51.16%E2%80%AFAM.png

Caption: And here’s Gemini’s advice.
Source: Screenshot

Screenshot-2025-04-03-at-9.52.47%E2%80%AFAM.png

Caption: xAI’s Grok is of the same opinion.
Source: Screenshot

Screenshot-2025-04-03-at-9.53.50%E2%80%AFAM.png

Caption: And even Claude agrees!
Source: Screenshot


Here’s how ChatGPT suggests handling a trade deficit.Screenshot: OpenAI

A number
of X users have realized that if you ask ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, or Grok for an “easy” way to solve trade deficits and put the US on “an even playing field”, they’ll give you a version of this “deficit divided by exports” formula with remarkable consistency. The Verge tested this with the phrasing used in those posts, as well as a question based more closely on the government’s language, asking chatbots for “an easy way for the US to calculate tariffs that should be imposed on other countries to balance bilateral trade deficits between the US and each of its trading partners, with the goal of driving bilateral trade deficits to zero.” All four platforms gave us the same fundamental suggestion.

There is some variation. Grok and Claude specifically suggested halving the tariff figure to generate what Grok calls a “reasonable” result, much like Trump’s “discount” idea. Ask for a 10 percent baseline tariff and the systems also disagree on whether that should be added to the total tariff rate or not. But answers from across the four chatbots have more similarities than differences.

The bots caution with varying levels of seriousness that there are tradeoffs and complications. Gemini, the most strident of them, will give you a page full of explanations as to why this oversimplified approach could backfire — “while this calculation offers a seemingly straightforward way to target bilateral trade deficits, the real-world economic implications are far more complex and could lead to substantial negative consequences,” it warns, adding that “many economists argue that tariffs are not an effective tool for balancing trade deficits.”

We don’t know that Trump’s team turned to an AI tool to generate global trade policy on the fly. Since chatbots are regurgitating information from training data, it’s also not clear how they arrived at this particular formula. But regardless of how the tariffs were devised, the world will be watching to see if they come into effect starting April 5th — and, if they’re implemented, what the Trump team’s back-of-the-napkin math will do to global trade.

70 Comments / 70 New
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
62,860
Reputation
9,548
Daps
172,117













1/22
@JamesSurowiecki
Just figured out where these fake tariff rates come from. They didn't actually calculate tariff rates + non-tariff barriers, as they say they did. Instead, for every country, they just took our trade deficit with that country and divided it by the country's exports to us.

So we have a $17.9 billion trade deficit with Indonesia. Its exports to us are $28 billion. $17.9/$28 = 64%, which Trump claims is the tariff rate Indonesia charges us. What extraordinary nonsense this is.

[Quoted tweet]
It's also important to understand that the tariff rates that foreign countries are supposedly charging us are just made-up numbers. South Korea, with which we have a trade agreement, is not charging a 50% tariff on U.S. exports. Nor is the EU charging a 39% tariff.


Gnjz7DQWcAARduw.jpg

Gnjz7DRXEAIfFXb.jpg


2/22
@JamesSurowiecki
Even given that it's Trump, I cannot believe they said "We'll just divide the trade deficit by imports and tell people that's the tariff rate." And then they decided to set our tariffs by just cutting that totally made-up rate in half! This is so dumb and deceptive.



3/22
@JamesSurowiecki
How in God's name did Scott Bessent agree to sign off on this?



4/22
@JamesSurowiecki
This tweet is correct, but it's actually worse than I thought: in calculating the tariff rate, Trump's people only used the trade deficit in goods. So even though we run a trade surplus in services with the world, those exports don't count as far as Trump is concerned.
https://nitter.poast.org/JamesSurowiecki/status/1907559189234196942



5/22
@Psychonaut1001
I’m Australian,
America has a trade SURPLUS with us, and they’ve STILL put a 10% tariff on us.



6/22
@JamesSurowiecki
Yes, any country where we have a trade surplus or where the trade deficit/imports is less than 10% had their tariff rate listed as 10%.



7/22
@orthonormalist


[Quoted tweet]
DID I CRACK IT?

I think I figured out at least a chunk of the math.

It's trade deficit divided by their exports.

EU: exports 531.6, imports 333.4, deficit 198.2. 198.2/531.6 is 37, close to 39.

Israel: exports 22.2, imports 14.8, deficit 7.4. 7.4/22.2 is 33.


8/22
@JamesSurowiecki
They're also only looking at goods, so even though we run a massive services surplus with the world, that didn't count when they calculated these imaginary "tariff rates."



9/22
@mdangremond
How many calculations have you checked?



10/22
@JamesSurowiecki
A few. But it's obviously right. Look at the UK. The UK has a 20% VAT, which Trump says counts as a non-tariff barrier. But its tariff rate is supposedly only 10%. That's because our balance of trade with the UK is almost even, and all countries are listed as having at least a 10% tariff rate.



11/22
@SpencerHakimian
You cannot be serious.



12/22
@JamesSurowiecki
Amazingly, I am. They're also only looking at goods. So even though we run a massive services surplus with the world, Trump just ignored that when calculating the "tariff rate."



13/22
@JamesGozzi
Nonsense that is going to work.

Argentina 🇦🇷 - Removed all tariffs
Vietnam 🇻🇳 - Removed all tariffs
Israel 🇮🇱 - Removed all tariffs
Canada 🇨🇦 - Moving toward no tariffs
Mexico 🇲🇽 - No tariffs planned
India 🇮🇳 - Considering reducing tariffs
EU 🇪🇺 - Planning retaliation
Australia 🇦🇺 - No tariffs planned



14/22
@JamesSurowiecki
Do you anticipate American companies doing a lot of exporting to Vietnam now?



15/22
@Phili_Thomp
That's why some countries are charged less than their actual MFN rate

Turkey, 16.2%, 10% Trump rate
Argentina, 13.4%, 10% Trump rate
Morocco, 14%, 10% Trump rate

For what it's worth (nothing) there is a U.S.- FTA with Morocco... And it's the Mexico carmaker for Europe



16/22
@JamesSurowiecki
Yes - if our balance of trade with a country is roughly even (or trade deficit/imports is less than 10%), they're listed as 10%.



17/22
@ChrisKartalia
If the rates are inflated, all the easier for countries to “cut” them, Trump claims a win, and gets the 10% ongoing rate that he really wants



18/22
@JamesSurowiecki
In some cases, the rates listed are less than the rates countries actually charge, because we run a small trade deficit with them, and if trade deficit/imports is less than 10%, Trump just listed their tariff rate as 10%.



19/22
@0xKingAlex
This is pure cope. The chart includes tariffs and non-tariff barriers, VATs, currency manipulation, import bans, regs, etc.

You’re pretending it’s just deficit math to gaslight. It’s not. It’s reciprocity.

If they tax us 40%, we tax them 40%. Simple.



20/22
@JamesSurowiecki
Will you stop? They're not taxing us 40%. That's an imaginary number. The "tariff rates" in that chart are literally just our trade deficit in goods with a country/our imports from that country. They don't reflect actual tariffs + non-tariff barriers.



21/22
@wightmanr
Hrm... not disagreeing that the rates are fake / nonsense... but feels more arbitrary than suggested. EU for instance, the trade imbalance is only ~3% of the total trade if you factor in goods and services. The 20% seems closer to the VAT, which is also completely moronic to consider a tariff given that it applies to foreign and domestic goods equally... I think the average tariff rate in both directions up until now was about 1% in both directions.... regardless, WTF, where are the adults in the room?



22/22
@JamesSurowiecki
As I said later in the thread, they ignored services when calculating the "tariff rates." They only looked at goods.




To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
 

powmia

Pro
Joined
Jan 24, 2016
Messages
499
Reputation
117
Daps
2,480
Top