TONY KHAN STINKS! (TK ⛷️❄️ BINGES ON OFFER FROM WBD; WEMBLEY TURNSTILE COUNT = 46K 😢; DYNAMITE NO MILLION WATCH: 575 DAYS/82 WEEKS)

Mook

We should all strive to be like Mr. Rogers.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
22,876
Reputation
2,409
Daps
58,353
Reppin
Raleigh
PHILLIP BROOKS SPATAFORE IS AN ASS MUNCHER
 

DanielAlfredsson

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
4,891
Reputation
595
Daps
14,909
Reppin
NULL

CM Punk was terminated by AEW following a situation at AEW All Out by a quickly developed discipline committee, and we’ve learned more, largely because of a tweet that may have referenced it.
Recently, Fightful revealed that a long rumored member of the committee, Megha Parekh, had actually stepped back from a lot of her duties as Chief Legal Officer by that time and actually had nothing to do with the committee. We’ve since learned that AEW General Counsel Chris Peck, who assumed many of her responsibilities, was a part of the three-person committee, along with an outside attorney.
However, there was also one long-respected member of the AEW talent roster that was involved, in Bryan Danielson. When asking sources on the AEW roster about his inclusion, one called him an “appropriate moral compass who exemplifies objectivity" and said that he effectively headed up and was the face of the disciplinary committee. Danielson was said to have spoken to the roster when addressing them about Punk’s termination, and noted that the decision was a particularly hard one. He cited the positives that CM Punk brought and his longstanding friendship with Punk, but said that it was the decision that had to be made.
On November 27, Danielson tweeted “My dad always told me, “The right thing is often the hardest thing to do. It won’t always make the most money. It won’t always be the most popular. But it’s still the right thing." We’re told that’s what Danielson said when speaking to talent at the meeting months before.
We weren’t given any indication regarding the decision making process that occurred by the disciplinary committee. Those that we spoke to said they believed CM Punk was aware by now that Danielson was a pair of said committee, as many of his friends were included in the meeting where Danielson addressed them.
This is a continued duty for Danielson, as he's also responsible for handing out fines when necessary.
CM Punk returned to WWE this past weekend.​
 

Rollie Forbes

Drapetomaniac.
Joined
Aug 10, 2017
Messages
67,012
Reputation
12,091
Daps
204,769
QT Marshall was the absolute worst part of AEW :camby:
Aew Tony GIF - Aew Tony Khan GIFs
 

Killah Ray

Carolina hail to thee....
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
12,347
Reputation
2,025
Daps
35,869
PWG with a big budget?

God forbid they have sports entertainment. They act like that’s a damn sin or something.
I mean they legit had a stable who were heels and called themselves sports entertainers…not unlike early TNA…
 

Pammy91

Pro
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
1,316
Reputation
21
Daps
2,375
Reppin
Never you mind....


CM Punk was terminated by AEW following a situation at AEW All Out by a quickly developed discipline committee, and we’ve learned more, largely because of a tweet that may have referenced it.
Recently, Fightful revealed that a long rumored member of the committee, Megha Parekh, had actually stepped back from a lot of her duties as Chief Legal Officer by that time and actually had nothing to do with the committee. We’ve since learned that AEW General Counsel Chris Peck, who assumed many of her responsibilities, was a part of the three-person committee, along with an outside attorney.
However, there was also one long-respected member of the AEW talent roster that was involved, in Bryan Danielson. When asking sources on the AEW roster about his inclusion, one called him an “appropriate moral compass who exemplifies objectivity" and said that he effectively headed up and was the face of the disciplinary committee. Danielson was said to have spoken to the roster when addressing them about Punk’s termination, and noted that the decision was a particularly hard one. He cited the positives that CM Punk brought and his longstanding friendship with Punk, but said that it was the decision that had to be made.
On November 27, Danielson tweeted “My dad always told me, “The right thing is often the hardest thing to do. It won’t always make the most money. It won’t always be the most popular. But it’s still the right thing." We’re told that’s what Danielson said when speaking to talent at the meeting months before.
We weren’t given any indication regarding the decision making process that occurred by the disciplinary committee. Those that we spoke to said they believed CM Punk was aware by now that Danielson was a pair of said committee, as many of his friends were included in the meeting where Danielson addressed them.
This is a continued duty for Danielson, as he's also responsible for handing out fines when necessary.
CM Punk returned to WWE this past weekend.​
Nasty work down there in Jacksonville if this is true.
 

Brad Piff

The Money & The Miles
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,841
Reputation
2,684
Daps
54,697
Reppin
San Diego


CM Punk was terminated by AEW following a situation at AEW All Out by a quickly developed discipline committee, and we’ve learned more, largely because of a tweet that may have referenced it.
Recently, Fightful revealed that a long rumored member of the committee, Megha Parekh, had actually stepped back from a lot of her duties as Chief Legal Officer by that time and actually had nothing to do with the committee. We’ve since learned that AEW General Counsel Chris Peck, who assumed many of her responsibilities, was a part of the three-person committee, along with an outside attorney.
However, there was also one long-respected member of the AEW talent roster that was involved, in Bryan Danielson. When asking sources on the AEW roster about his inclusion, one called him an “appropriate moral compass who exemplifies objectivity" and said that he effectively headed up and was the face of the disciplinary committee. Danielson was said to have spoken to the roster when addressing them about Punk’s termination, and noted that the decision was a particularly hard one. He cited the positives that CM Punk brought and his longstanding friendship with Punk, but said that it was the decision that had to be made.
On November 27, Danielson tweeted “My dad always told me, “The right thing is often the hardest thing to do. It won’t always make the most money. It won’t always be the most popular. But it’s still the right thing." We’re told that’s what Danielson said when speaking to talent at the meeting months before.
We weren’t given any indication regarding the decision making process that occurred by the disciplinary committee. Those that we spoke to said they believed CM Punk was aware by now that Danielson was a pair of said committee, as many of his friends were included in the meeting where Danielson addressed them.
This is a continued duty for Danielson, as he's also responsible for handing out fines when necessary.
CM Punk returned to WWE this past weekend.​
TK is even dumber than I thought.

You don’t assign an active wrestler as head of any disciplinary commission, I don’t care who it is. He also put Bryan in charge of fines? Really????

So Bryan is cool with doing all of this, but wouldn’t accept being champion? Oh man.
 

Pammy91

Pro
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
1,316
Reputation
21
Daps
2,375
Reppin
Never you mind....
Nasty how? Danielson seems to be one of the most level headed people in wrestling. If it was corporate people leading the committee, then the complaint would be that they just don't get it's wrestling, etc etc
Why is an active wrestler involved in making these decisions? So “the boys” don’t get their panties in a twist? There’s nothing inherently wrong with a disciplinary committee but the people on it have to be a neutral party. A lot of the issues in that place seems to stem from people being in positions they have zero qualifications to be in :manny:
 

Jmare007

pico pal q lee
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
43,695
Reputation
5,787
Daps
107,744
Reppin
Chile
The Bryan Danielson thing leaking feels like damage control for AEW. "Dont blame us, Daniel, who everybody loves, had a hand in getting rid of Punk".
Yeah, the source that Fightful has in that report sounds like Tony Khan giving them the info.

Why is an active wrestler involved in making these decisions? So “the boys” don’t get their panties in a twist? There’s nothing inherently wrong with a disciplinary committee but the people on it have to be a neutral party. A lot of the issues in that place seems to stem from people being in positions they have zero qualifications to be in :manny:
Wrestle court worked for WWF though :lolbron:
 

Ohnoits

All Star
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
4,004
Reputation
200
Daps
6,318
Reppin
NULL
Why is an active wrestler involved in making these decisions? So “the boys” don’t get their panties in a twist? There’s nothing inherently wrong with a disciplinary committee but the people on it have to be a neutral party. A lot of the issues in that place seems to stem from people being in positions they have zero qualifications to be in :manny:
It's a fukking joke of an operation lol in what company they do that at...come on Tony.
This guy is so non confrontational he puts the decision in the hands of active talent. "I can't fire him! I'm his biggest fan!"
 

Ohnoits

All Star
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
4,004
Reputation
200
Daps
6,318
Reppin
NULL
Yeah, the source that Fightful has in that report sounds like Tony Khan giving them the info.


Wrestle court worked for WWF though :lolbron:
to be fair, wrestler's court never fired wrestlers.

I've heard even NFL locker rooms have had some form of internal committee to try to handle inter-team disputes
 
Top