There's so many single women out here

ThrobbingHood

Breh&Breh Associates™
Joined
Nov 11, 2017
Messages
31,889
Reputation
15,708
Daps
227,436
Funny you mention that, both women at the university had “pretty boys” partners. I never thought about it like that, but maybe :jbhmm:
EFPsbUWX4AEdU_Q

Trust me breh... I've seen it all. There are 'kept men' as well as 'kept women'. Women like eye candy on their arms too. Especially one she can control.
 

7th Letter Specialist

99’ Expedition w/ the TV’s in it..
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
11,151
Reputation
4,692
Daps
41,643
Reppin
Oakland, CA
Did I stutter?
Nah. u just sound like a female

Interesting... especially the bolded. They are certainly the exception to the rule. Either those women are not that physically attractive and they are dating/marrying pretty boys or those men must've laid the pipe to them.:dame:

But I will say a lot of blue collar jobs make just as much money as high paying corporate jobs.
I feel you, but the guy probably was holdin shyt down as she was on the come up
 

CarmelBarbie

At peace
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
10,600
Reputation
8,574
Daps
58,841
Reppin
Charlotte
It depends what you mean by "successful".

The successful women I'm around definitely want to marry men who are equal or greater than them in status. Now they may date guys who aren't quite up there but their goal for marriage isn't being with a guy who isn't the bread winner.

BTW... I'm not saying you're lying, I'm just saying successful has many different meanings. And in my experience, a successful woman is not settling for less unless she has low self esteem.

Edit: for example... there are some women I know who have a managerial role, their own place, their own car and think that's success. But you add in the student loan, car note, monthly payment for the rent (not mortgage) and you then see how that 50/60 thousand a year before tax, doesn't leave a lot for disposable income.

Then take my friend whose salary is less than that but he owns his place and car debt free. He has passive income from other businesses. On paper.. his hourly rate isn't enough for the woman in the OP... but he has so much disposable income, he is taking vacations every month.

I have single friends who are highly educated with decent paying careers( paying 60k and above) they do care about being with a man that made significantly less, so I’m not sure what that poster was saying either.

It’s actually not much wrong with $18 an hour if it’s a young single male in his early to mid twenties in a low col city with no debt, kids, and that is frugal. Especially where I live(in Charlotte)...

But the circumstances matter. for my age range that salary means he doesn’t have a trade or a degree, which means he doesn’t have skills that can be transferred in case he lost a job, moved, etc. The chances of stability are more difficult without a degree or trade.

I have a friend who is 37 who met a man a couple of years ago who was making in the 50/60 range at a job, that he got from a friend who knew him. A year later he lost the job. The thing is he has no trade, degree or decent paying skill. So he’s now working one full time job making $18 an hour, and one part time job making like $15. That’s all he could get. He’s 43, with three kids. He doesn’t even have time to date and is pretty tired, and he’s strapped financially. He got lucky with the job he had the year before but in the end, it’s more than just the income that matters.

Women think about wanting families, wanting to get a house with their husband, and other expenses that requires two decent income these days, if they want to live a semblance of middle class life.

I do think women these days are a little more open than in the past to men making a little less, especially if they already make more than enough to live the lives they want already(which is different from making enough to have some of what you want but not having enough to live the lifestyle you want—which is more likely to result in women seeking men that make the same or more to fill in that gap lol).

In any case, I think significant income differences can present issues depending on the people involved.

If a women makes a few dollars more than $18 and they both are single, and young, and he’s a good saver, if she has loans and debts, it equals out, so looking down on his salary is strange but everyone is entitled to their preferences.

But in my age range, even if i factor in loans and debt(in my case isn’t very much tbh) my salary is more than twice $18 an hour and that’s just in one stream of income—(i also get child support and a small stream of passive income added to all of that) so it becomes a very significant difference. On top of the fact that he doesn’t have a trade, skill or degree.

Also not sure why 50/60K is being thrown around as the amount women in managerial roles in corporate offices make. Not sure where y’all live but here in Charlotte 50/60K is actually a low salary for a manager unless they are a store manager or non profit.
 

Easy-E

I 💗My Tribal Chief
Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
53,487
Reputation
9,415
Daps
159,301
Reppin
NO/VA/Nashville

Bias and misleading.
  • Excludes the unemployed--which is high
  • Excludes the incarcerated--more black men in prison in America (733k) than women in the world (700k)--which is historically high
  • Most black wealth are in the hands of Boomer aged males (not dating) and in their homes (already established)
  • Double check a "gender wage gap" study by two white women working for Institute for "Women's Policy Research"
Extensive Data Shows Punishing Reach of Racism for Black Boys
 

ThrobbingHood

Breh&Breh Associates™
Joined
Nov 11, 2017
Messages
31,889
Reputation
15,708
Daps
227,436
Dam. .. you hit me with a booksnrain titan graph.

I have single friends who are highly educated with decent paying careers( paying 60k and above) they do care about being with a man that made significantly less, so I’m not sure what that poster was saying either.

It’s actually not much wrong with $18 an hour if it’s a young single male in his early to mid twenties in a low col city with no debt, kids, and that is frugal. Especially where I live(in Charlotte)...
That's true. The girlfriends who I had dated during that rough period were in the same boat as me but we always saw the potential in each other. Sadly it didn't work out but it goes to show there are decent women out there who don't expect the finished product at a young age.

But the circumstances matter. for my age range that salary means he doesn’t have a trade or a degree, which means he doesn’t have skills that can be transferred in case he lost a job, moved, etc. The chances of stability are more difficult without a degree or trade.

I have a friend who is 37 who met a man a couple of years ago who was making in the 50/60 range at a job, that he got from a friend who knew him. A year later he lost the job. The thing is he has no trade, degree or decent paying skill. So he’s now working one full time job making $18 an hour, and one part time job making like $15. That’s all he could get. He’s 43, with three kids. He doesn’t even have time to date and is pretty tired, and he’s strapped financially. He got lucky with the job he had the year before but in the end, it’s more than just the income that matters.

Women think about wanting families, wanting to get a house with their husband, and other expenses that requires two decent income these days, if they want to live a semblance of middle class life.
And that's the problem. It's harder for women (especially black women) to reach the top of the mountain of their respective fields. Once they do by their mid 30s.. the dating pool of men in their age bracket is slim... especially if they're looking for men with no children and a similar salary. It's damn near impossible.

And no man in that position is going to settle down..and if I'm being brutally honest... a man in his 30s with no kids and a good salary is going to play the field for a while and more than likely settle down with a woman much younger.


I do think women these days are a little more open than in the past to men making a little less, especially if they already make more than enough to live the lives they want already(which is different from making enough to have some of what you want but not having enough to live the lifestyle you want—which is more likely to result in women seeking men that make the same or more to fill in that gap lol).

In any case, I think significant income differences can present issues depending on the people involved.
Yup. I don't think there's anything wrong with a woman wanting financial security as she gets older. That's exactly what she should be seeking if she wants to start a family. The problem is.. there are a lot of women out there who want the cream of the crop but bring nothing to the table but ass and titties.

I come from a traditional family so I'm happy to be the breadwinner and have a stay at home wife. But the women I meet scoff at that idea... acting as if that's beneath them.


If a women makes a few dollars more than $18 and they both are single, and young, and he’s a good saver, if she has loans and debts, it equals out, and in those cases i think it can work a lot more.

But in my age range, even if i factor in loans and debt(in my case isn’t very much tbh) my salary is more than twice $18 an hour and that’s just in one stream of income—(i also get child support and a small stream of passive income added to all of that) so it becomes a very significant difference.

Also not sure why 50/60K is being thrown around as the amount women in managerial roles in corporate offices make. Not sure where y’all live but here in Charlotte 50/60K is actually a low salary for a manager unless they are a store manager or non profit.
That's a figure I threw out there as my point. There are women I know who make that amount thinking they've made it when that's 's low managerial salary role. But to them, the title alone and having a car and own space makes them think that's success.

Go figure.
 
Top