It speaks to intellectual consistency to not speak on things you can't confirm.
Thats like saying astronomy is bullshyt since we don't know if theres life on other planets.
Kind of. At worst, it provides a framework.
It speaks to intellectual consistency to not speak on things you can't confirm.
Thats like saying astronomy is bullshyt since we don't know if theres life on other planets.
Do you even know what spontaneous generation is?????
I've discussed this at length on here. If anything the Neanderthal fossils prove the bible is true...truer than science could ever hope to be.
I knew I shouldn't have clicked on this demonic filthy thread...so much blasphemy in here
Just ignore him. He's incredibly dumb.
What in the world are you talking about?
2 months back you barely believed in the bible. Now all of the sudden you're it's sworn defender cause you think the og Israelites were "black"
And you wonder why I ate you and LionofJudah's food in that "Hebrew Israelite" thread.
please link that, id love to read it. were they god's rough draft as he practiced making adam?
Bruh. Those aren't even HUMANS.
It speaks to intellectual consistency to not speak on things you can't confirm.
Thats like saying astronomy is bullshyt since we don't know if theres life on other planets.
That statement should be applied to evolution because it can't be confirmed either. All of the so-called evidence that was used to confirm evolution has been debunked decades ago.
All of the so-called evidence that was used to confirm evolution has been debunked decades ago.
Spontaneous generation is a debunked hypothesis from the 19th Century. The first page of Google results will tell you this from various sources. So I'm not sure why you think this is a common evolutionist belief.
If you're referring to abiogenesis, that's not the same thing or even part of an explanation involved in evolution. So again, I'm not sure on your original point.
Did you get a flu shot at any point in your life?
you did'nt answer my question.Is the moon made of cheese?